Literature DB >> 32863114

Robotic ICG guided anatomical liver resection in a multi-centre cohort: an evolution from "positive staining" into "negative staining" method.

Adrian K H Chiow1, Seoung Yoon Rho2, Ian J Y Wee3, Lip Seng Lee4, Gi Hong Choi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic major anatomical liver resection is challenging. The robotic liver resection (RLR) approach, with Firefly indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, was proposed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy. The aim of this multi-centre international study was to evaluate the use of Firefly ICG imaging in anatomical RLR.
METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing RLR anatomical resection with intra-operative ICG administration from January 2015 to July 2018 were enrolled. Patients who underwent simultaneous or en-bloc resections of other organs were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were recruited of which 32 patients were healthy donors, 17 with malignancy and 3 for benign conditions. 12 patients had cirrhosis. 28 patients underwent a right hepatectomy (53.8%) with left hepatectomy performed with 18 patients. 40 patients underwent negative staining and 12 patients via direct portal vein injection for positive staining. ICG demarcation line was visualized in 43 patients and was clearer than the ischaemic demarcation line in 29 patients. All resections for malignancy had clear margins. There were no 30-day/inpatient mortalities.
CONCLUSION: Robotic ICG guided hepatectomy technique for anatomical liver resection is safe, feasible and has the benefit for improved visualization in healthy donors and cirrhotic patients.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32863114     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  3 in total

1.  International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.

Authors:  Adrian K H Chiow; David Fuks; Gi-Hong Choi; Nicholas Syn; Iswanto Sucandy; Marco V Marino; Mikel Prieto; Charing C Chong; Jae Hoon Lee; Mikhail Efanov; T Peter Kingham; Sung Hoon Choi; Robert P Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Johann Pratschke; Tan-To Cheung; Xiaoying Wang; Rong Liu; Mathieu D'Hondt; Chung-Yip Chan; Chung Ngai Tang; Ho-Seong Han; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Robotic major liver resections: Surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections.

Authors:  Hye Yeon Yang; Seoung Yoon Rho; Dai Hoon Han; Jin Sub Choi; Gi Hong Choi
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-02-28

Review 3.  Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Giannone; Emanuele Felli; Zineb Cherkaoui; Pietro Mascagni; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.