Literature DB >> 32858138

Catheterization laboratory activity before and during COVID-19 spread: A comparative analysis in Piedmont, Italy, by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE).

Giorgio Quadri1, Andrea Rognoni2, Enrico Cerrato3, Giorgio Baralis4, Giacomo Boccuzzi5, Elvis Brscic6, Federico Conrotto7, Michele De Benedictis8, Leonardo De Martino9, Angelo Di Leo10, Fabio Ferrari3, Andrea Gagnor11, Giuseppe Pietro Greco Lucchina12, Tiziana Montaldo13, Giuseppe Patti14, Elena Gribaudo15, Maurizio Alessandro Reale16, Pierluigi Soldà17, Francesco Tomassini3, Alessandra Truffa18, Fabrizio Ugo19, Ferdinando Varbella3, Giovanni Esposito20, Giuseppe Tarantini21, Giuseppe Musumeci15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) led to the reorganization of Cardiology Units in terms of working spaces and healthcare personnel. In this scenario, both outpatient visits and elective interventional cardiology procedures were suspended and/or postponed. We aimed to report the impact of COVID-19 on interventional coronary and structural procedures in Piedmont, Italy.
METHODS: The number of coronary angiographies (CAG), percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primary PCI (pPCI), transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR) and Mitraclip performed in Piedmont between March 1st and April 20th, 2020 (CoV-time) were collected from each catheterization laboratory and compared to the number of procedures performed the year before in the same months (NoCoV-time).
RESULTS: Procedural data from 18 catheterization laboratories were collected. Both coronary (5498 versus 2888: difference: -47.5%; mean 305.4 VS 160.4; p = 0.002) and structural (84 versus 17: difference: -79.8%; mean 4.7 Vs 0.9; p < 0.001) procedures decreased during CoV-time compared to NoCoV-time. In particular, coronary angiographies (1782 versus 3460), PCI (1074 versus 1983), p PCI (271 versus 410), TAVR (11 versus 72) and Mitraclip (6 versus 12) showed a reduction of 48.5%, 45.7%, 33.7%, 84.7% and 50.0%, respectively (all p for comparison <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the same time-period in 2019, both coronary and structural interventional procedures during COVID-19 epidemic suffered a dramatic decrease in Piedmont, Italy. Organizational change and structured clinical pathways should be created, together with awareness campaigns.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; GISE; Mitraclip; PCI; Piedmont; TAVR

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32858138      PMCID: PMC7446645          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


Introduction

COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) emergency led to Italian hospital reorganization in terms of logistical and departmental structure, to allow the hospitalization of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome [1]. In Piedmont, Italy, Cardiology Units have been involved in the reorganization process: most of them have been closed or turned into COVID units. Elective interventional cardiology procedures (coronary, structural and electrophysiological) have been suspended and/or postponed. Unfortunately, while the general attention of the healthcare world is focused on the pandemic, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality [2]. Since the beginning of the emergency there has been a marked reduction in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction, as confirmed by US registries [3]. Furthermore, because of the fear of COVID-19 infection, patients with myocardial infarction arrive to the hospital with considerable delay, with consequent worsening of the clinical status and increased mortality rate [4]. To confirm this trend, we reported the impact of COVID-19 on interventional coronary and structural procedures in Piedmont, the seventh most populated region in Italy (4,450,000 inhabitants), but the second most hit region in the Country.

Methods

The Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) collected the number of coronary and structural procedures performed in every catheterization laboratory of the Piedmont region between March 1st and April 20th, 2020 (CoV-time) and in the same-year period in 2019 (NoCoV-time). Coronary procedures were defined as coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Moreover, the number of primary PCI (pPCI) was recorded. Structural procedure included transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR) and Mitraclip. Data from each catheterization laboratory were pooled together and compared according to the corresponding time-period. The relative change (%) in the number of procedures was calculated for each type of cardiac intervention as (number of procedures in CoV-time – number of procedures in NoCoV-time) / number of procedures in NoCoV-time ⁎ 100. Variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were compared with Student's t-test. Statistical significance was set at the 2-tailed 0.05.

Results

Data from 18 catheterization laboratories were collected. Table 1 shows the number of procedures performed in each center as well as the total number of procedures performed in Piedmont from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 (CoV-time) and in the same-year period in 2019 (NoCoV-time). One thousand seven hundred eighty-seven patients underwent an interventional procedure during CoV-time, 32 of them (1.8%) being COVID-19 positive.
Table 1

Coronary and structural procedures performed in Piedmont from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 (CoV-time) and in the same-year period in 2019 (NoCoV-time).

Hospital/proceduresNoCoV-time
CoV-time
NoCoV-time
CoV-time
NoCoV-time
CoV-time
NoCoV-time
CoV-time
NoCoV-time
CoV-time
CAGCAGPCIPCIpPCIpPCITAVRTAVRMTRMTR
Alba98555532650000
Alessandriad2791301719745174000
Asti11058923021140000
Biella11165673916100000
Ciriè/Ivrea2451581377146190000
Cuneod2419011255242510020
Domodossola130477340470000
Giovanni Bosco TRN188951387727190000
Maria Pia Hospital TRN b, d2317584340019645
Maria Vittoria TRN226991497128110000
Mauriziano TRNd17017110573241814220
Molinette TRNd30811415571341815341
Moncalieri12378896123180000
Novarad29516016177313010000
Orbassanoa, c150238291000000
Rivolic25721914316222380000
Savigliano121761015820120000
Vercelli177691244935150000
TOTAL34601782203811064162767211116
Mean192.299.0113.261.423.115.34.00.60.70.3
SD69.450.735.133.212.89.61.61.41.41.2
P-Value0.0040.0020.015<0.0010.001

Legend: TRN: Turin. CAG: coronary angiography. PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention. pPCI: primary PCI; TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; MTR: Mitraclip; SD: standard deviation.

Stop of activities on March 20th 2020.

Stop of activities on March 28th 2020.

Orbassano and Rivoli Hospital share the same Interventional Cardiology Unit.

Cardiac surgery on site.

Coronary and structural procedures performed in Piedmont from March 1st to April 20th, 2020 (CoV-time) and in the same-year period in 2019 (NoCoV-time). Legend: TRN: Turin. CAG: coronary angiography. PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention. pPCI: primary PCI; TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; MTR: Mitraclip; SD: standard deviation. Stop of activities on March 20th 2020. Stop of activities on March 28th 2020. Orbassano and Rivoli Hospital share the same Interventional Cardiology Unit. Cardiac surgery on site. A total of 2888 coronary procedures were performed in the CoV-time versus 5498 cases in the NoCoV-time, determining a 47.5% decrease (mean 305.4 versus mean 160.4 procedures; p = 0.002). An even higher reduction was noted for structural heart disease (17 versus 84 procedures; 79.8% decrease; mean 4.7 vs mean 0.9 procedures; p < 0.001). In particular, the number of coronary angiographies (1782 versus 3460), PCI (1074 versus 1983), pPCI (271 versus 410), TAVR (11 versus 72) and Mitraclip (6 versus 12) was reduced by 48.5%, 45.7%, 33.7%, 84.7% and 50.0%, respectively (all p for comparison <0.05) (Fig. 1 ).
Fig. 1

Reduction of coronary procedures (CAG + PCI) in the 8 Provinces of Piedmont region (Panel A) and of each interventional procedure in the whole region (Panel B) during CoV-time compared to NoCoV-time.

CAG: coronary angiography, PCI: percutaneous coronary artery intervention, pPCI: primary percutaneous coronary artery intervention, TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacements.

Reduction of coronary procedures (CAG + PCI) in the 8 Provinces of Piedmont region (Panel A) and of each interventional procedure in the whole region (Panel B) during CoV-time compared to NoCoV-time. CAG: coronary angiography, PCI: percutaneous coronary artery intervention, pPCI: primary percutaneous coronary artery intervention, TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacements. The great majority of catheterization laboratories showed an impressive decrease in coronary procedures during CoV-time with the exception of Mauriziano Hospital [+ 1 (0.6%) coronary angiography], Cuneo Hospital [+ 1 (4.2%) pPCI], Rivoli Hospital [+19 (13.3%) PCI and +13 (72.7%) pPCI] and Domodossola [+3 (75%) pPCI]. All catheterization laboratories except Maria Pia Hospital [+1 (25%) Mitraclip] showed a significant decrease in structural procedures.

Discussion

COVID-19 represents a public health emergency of international concern [5]. In order to face its spread, several containing strategies, both in healthcare and non-healthcare settings, have been developed [[6], [7], [8]]. The implementation of economic and medical resources has become a priority [9]. Italy represents one of the most affected countries worldwide, and Piedmont still remains the second most hit region in the Country. Northern Italy Cardiology departments had to deal with a thorough reorganization process, with most of intensive care units (ICU) converted to COVID wards. Scientific Italian Societies provided guidelines on the management of outpatient visits and cardiac invasive procedures, in order to guarantee the proper level of care to patients with cardiovascular disease and, in the meantime, the safety and protection of healthcare providers [[10], [11], [12]]. In the present analysis we reported the catheterization laboratory activity in Piedmont, Italy, during COVID-19 era, and we compared these data with the same period in 2019. Most of catheterization laboratories suffered a dramatic reduction in the total number of coronary and structural procedures, with a decrease of 47.5% and 79.8%, respectively, compared to 2019 data. However, if elective procedure were judiciously postponed by cardiologists, explaining part of the global reduction, the 33.7% decrease in pPCI was not linked to the medical will. Our results are consistent with those reported in European and non-European countries dealing with COVID-19 epidemic. Dr. Garcia and Colleagues [3] showed an estimated 38% reduction in US cardiac catheterization laboratory activation for STEMI patients, that was similar to the 40% reduction noticed in Spain [13]. Dr. Metzler and Colleagues [14] confirmed this trend, showing a significant decline (39.4%) in the number of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome in Austria between March 2nd and 29th, 2020. Potential reasons to explain this reduction could be the combination of avoidance of medical care due to social distancing, concerns of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital, or increased use of pharmacological reperfusion [15]. However, in our registry, no STEMI patients admitted to Piedmont hospital were treated with fibrinolytic therapy between March 1st and April 20th, 2020: these data confirmed that the reduction rate of pPCI was mainly due to a decrease in hospital admissions rather than a change in reperfusion therapies. Although fibrinolytic therapy was adopted as the favorite reperfusion strategy in STEMI patients in a single center in China [16], latest recommendations support pPCI as the preferred therapeutic approach [17]. In order to deal with the worrisome reduction in interventional procedures, the creation of protected pathways to guarantee a safe hospital admission is of utmost importance. In this regard, the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) released a document with the purpose of managing patients with known cardiac disease and concomitant COVID-19 and patients without infection requiring ambulatory cardiologic evaluations and/or interventional procedures [18]. Concurrently, campaigns to raise awareness on the risk of fatality related to cardiac disease should be promoted among the general population.

Limitations

Our registry does not provide data on mortality related to the decrease in hospital admission for cardiac disease. However, the literature reports an increase in hospital mortality for cardiac reasons during the COVID-19 epidemic, likely reflecting the delay in reaching medical attention due to the fear of infection [19]. Moreover, one should theoretically account for the out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death rate, whose incidence is still unknown. The actual number of STEMI patients hospitalized during CoV-time could be higher than the one reported in our analysis since we didn't consider very late presenters medically treated only.

Conclusion

Compared to the same time-period in 2019, both coronary and structural interventional procedures during COVID-19 epidemic suffered a dramatic decrease in Piedmont, Italy, likely reflecting medical decision and patients' fear of infection. Organizational change and structured clinical pathways should be created, together with awareness campaigns.

Contributors

Cristina Rolfo, Fabio Mariani, Alfonso Franzè, Sebastian Cinconze, Mario Iannaccone, Andrea Borin, Umberto Barbero, Alessandro Lupi, Ettore Cassetti, Luca Gaido, Maurizio D'Amico, Paolo Vadalà, Gioel Gabrio Secco, Monica Verdoia, Marco Scaglione, Chiara Cavallino.

Declaration of Competing interest

None.
  8 in total

1.  Acute Coronary Syndromes and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results From an Observational Multicenter Registry During the Second Pandemic Spread in Lombardy.

Authors:  Marco Ferlini; Diego Castini; Giulia Ferrante; Giancarlo Marenzi; Matteo Montorfano; Stefano Savonitto; Maurizio D'Urbano; Corrado Lettieri; Claudio Cuccia; Marcello Marino; Luigi Oltrona Visconti; Stefano Carugo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  The Incidence and Impact of In-Hospital Bleeding in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Roberto Licordari; Alessandro Sticchi; Filippo Mancuso; Alessandro Caracciolo; Saverio Muscoli; Fortunato Iacovelli; Rossella Ruggiero; Alessandra Scoccia; Valeria Cammalleri; Marco Pavani; Marco Loffi; Domenico Scordino; Jayme Ferro; Andrea Rognoni; Andrea Buono; Stefano Nava; Stefano Albani; Iginio Colaiori; Filippo Zilio; Marco Borghesi; Valentina Regazzoni; Stefano Benenati; Fabio Pescetelli; Vincenzo De Marzo; Antonia Mannarini; Francesco Spione; Doronzo Baldassarre; Michele De Benedictis; Roberto Bonmassari; Gian Battista Danzi; Mario Galli; Alfonso Ielasi; Giuseppe Musumeci; Fabrizio Tomai; Vincenzo Pasceri; Italo Porto; Giuseppe Patti; Gianluca Campo; Antonio Colombo; Antonio Micari; Francesco Giannini; Francesco Costa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak on Emergency Department Presentation and Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emma Altobelli; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Francesca Marzi; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Reimondo Petrocelli; Giuseppe Patti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  COVID-19 and Acute Coronary Syndromes: Current Data and Future Implications.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Maria Concetta Pastore; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Marta Focardi; Giulia Biagioni; Paolo Cameli; Giuseppe Patti; Federico Franchi; Sergio Mondillo; Serafina Valente
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Safety of clinical engineer-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mitsutoshi Oguri; Hideki Ishii; Takuro Shigematsu; Rin Fujita; Yuichiro Koyama; Takeshi Katagiri; Yoshihiro Ikai; Yusuke Fujikawa; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yoriyasu Suzuki; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-08-09

6.  [Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on percutaneous coronary interventions in Portugal].

Authors:  Carlos Galvão Braga; Pedro Araújo Gonçalves; Pedro Cardoso; António Fiarresga; Lino Santos; Ana Domingues; Marco Costa; Rui Ferreira; José Duarte; Filipe Seixo; Rui Campante Teles; Hélder Pereira; João Carlos Silva; Renato Fernandes; José Baptista; Pedro Braga; João Costa; Pedro Farto E Abreu; Pedro Costa Ferreira; Graça Caires; Dinis Martins; Paulino Sousa; João Brum da Silveira
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 7.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospital Services for Patients with Cardiac Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mats de Lange; Ana Sofia Carvalho; Óscar Brito Fernandes; Hester Lingsma; Niek Klazinga; Dionne Kringos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency medical resources : An observational multicenter study including all hospitals in a major urban center of the Rhein-Ruhr metropolitan region.

Authors:  Sebastian Bergrath; Tobias Strapatsas; Michael Tuemen; Thorsten Reith; Marc Deussen; Olaf Aretz; Andreas Hohn; Andreas Lahm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 1.041

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.