Literature DB >> 32283124

Reduction in ST-Segment Elevation Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations in the United States During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Santiago Garcia, Mazen S Albaghdadi, Perwaiz M Meraj, Christian Schmidt, Ross Garberich, Farouc A Jaffer, Simon Dixon, Jeffrey J Rade, Mark Tannenbaum, Jenny Chambers, Paul P Huang, Timothy D Henry.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32283124      PMCID: PMC7151384          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


× No keyword cloud information.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the U.S. health care system. To preserve resources, including personal protective equipment and hospital beds to care for COVID-19 patients, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended deferral of elective cardiac procedures (1), including coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease. Timely reperfusion by means of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the standard of care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients (2). The Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions and American College of Cardiology continue to recommend PPCI as the standard treatment of STEMI patients during the current pandemic (3). However, anecdotal reports suggest a decline in PPCI volumes in the United States and around the world (4). To determine whether a decrease in PPCI is occurring in the United States in the COVID-19 era, we analyzed and quantified STEMI activations for 9 high-volume (>100 PPCIs/year) cardiac catheterization laboratories in the United States from January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020. Participating hospital systems included: 1) Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; 2) Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak, Michigan; 3) The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio; 4) Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5) UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts; 6) Iowa Heart, Des Moines, Iowa; 7) Northwell Health Hospital, Manhasset, New York; 8) Prairie Cardiovascular, Springfield, Illinois; and 9) Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. In this study, March 1, 2020, was identified as the beginning of the “after COVID-19” (AC) period when U.S. social life and medical operations were significantly affected (March 1, 2020, was also the day that New York City, the epicenter of U.S. COVID-19 cases, reported its first COVID-19 case). Social distancing was recommended by the federal government on March 15, 2020. The “before COVID-19” (BC) period comprised the 14 months leading up to the epidemic in the United States (January 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020). We now compared the BC and AC monthly total and average number of STEMI activations for each hospital. A mixed model with random intercepts corrected for time as a continuous variable was used to estimate the percent change in STEMI activations in the BC versus AC period. The model estimate showed a decrease in STEMI activations of 38% (95% confidence interval: 26% to 49%; p < 0.001). All sites combined reported >180 STEMI activations every month (mean 23.6 activations/month) in the BC period. In contrast, all sites combined reported only 138 activations (mean 15.3 activations/month) in the AC period (Figure 1 ).
Figure 1

STEMI Activations During the COVID-19 Pandemic

(Top left) Map of the United States showing the 9 high-volume ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) centers participating in this registry (yellow stars). (Lower left) Bar chart displaying average number of STEMI activations per site per month before and after the COVID-19 pandemic affected the U.S. health care system. (Right panel) Bar chart displaying total number of STEMI activations per month (blue: 2019; red: 2020).

STEMI Activations During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Top left) Map of the United States showing the 9 high-volume ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) centers participating in this registry (yellow stars). (Lower left) Bar chart displaying average number of STEMI activations per site per month before and after the COVID-19 pandemic affected the U.S. health care system. (Right panel) Bar chart displaying total number of STEMI activations per month (blue: 2019; red: 2020). Our preliminary analysis during the early phase of the COVID pandemic shows an estimated 38% reduction in U.S. cardiac catheterization laboratory STEMI activations, similar to the 40% reduction noticed in Spain (4). A priori, given the potential heightened environmental and psychosocial stressors and a higher case of STEMI induced by viral illness (e.g., similar to influenza) (5) or mimickers such as COVID-19 myopericarditis, an increase in STEMI activations would have been expected. Potential etiologies for the decrease in STEMI PPCI activations include avoidance of medical care due to social distancing or concerns of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital, STEMI misdiagnosis, and increased use of pharmacological reperfusion due to COVID-19. As the pandemic continues, we plan to continue to follow this early signal and investigate its causes. It is particularly crucial to understand if patient-based anxiety is decreasing presentation of STEMI patients to the U.S. hospital system.
  3 in total

1.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Gara; Frederick G Kushner; Deborah D Ascheim; Donald E Casey; Mina K Chung; James A de Lemos; Steven M Ettinger; James C Fang; Francis M Fesmire; Barry A Franklin; Christopher B Granger; Harlan M Krumholz; Jane A Linderbaum; David A Morrow; L Kristin Newby; Joseph P Ornato; Narith Ou; Martha J Radford; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Carl L Tommaso; Cynthia M Tracy; Y Joseph Woo; David X Zhao
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Acute Myocardial Infarction after Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Infection.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Kwong; Kevin L Schwartz; Michael A Campitelli; Hannah Chung; Natasha S Crowcroft; Timothy Karnauchow; Kevin Katz; Dennis T Ko; Allison J McGeer; Dayre McNally; David C Richardson; Laura C Rosella; Andrew Simor; Marek Smieja; George Zahariadis; Jonathan B Gubbay
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Catheterization Laboratory Considerations During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: From the ACC's Interventional Council and SCAI.

Authors:  Frederick G P Welt; Pinak B Shah; Herbert D Aronow; Anna E Bortnick; Timothy D Henry; Matthew W Sherwood; Michael N Young; Laura J Davidson; Sabeeda Kadavath; Ehtisham Mahmud; Ajay J Kirtane
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094

  3 in total
  410 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Complications of COVID-19 and Associated Concerns: A Review.

Authors:  Wen-Liang Yu; Han Siong Toh; Chia-Te Liao; Wei-Ting Chang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.672

2.  Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ting-Wei Lin; Meng-Ta Tsai; Hsuan-Yin Wu; Jun-Neng Roan; Chwan-Yau Luo
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Myocardial infarction in the shadow of COVID-19.

Authors:  Wojciech Wańha; Maciej Wybraniec; Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Karolina Kupczyńska; Piotr Dobrowolski; Błażej Michalski; Szymon Darocha; Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Maciej Kaźmierski; Rafał Januszek; Stanisław Bartuś; Adam Witkowski; Dariusz Dudek; Wojciech Wojakowski; Miłosz J Jaguszewski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  Falling stroke rates during COVID-19 pandemic at a Comprehensive Stroke Center: Cover title: Falling stroke rates during COVID-19.

Authors:  J E Siegler; M E Heslin; L Thau; A Smith; T G Jovin
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 5.  Reducing the Risk of Diagnostic Error in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Tejal K Gandhi; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  Collateral Effect of Covid-19 on Stroke Evaluation in the United States.

Authors:  Akash P Kansagra; Manu S Goyal; Scott Hamilton; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Medical Emergencies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Anna Slagman; Wilhelm Behringer; Felix Greiner; Matthias Klein; Dirk Weismann; Bernadett Erdmann; Mareen Pigorsch; Martin Möckel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  Right heart catheterization for pulmonary hypertension during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Authors:  Kanza N Qaiser; James E Lane; Adriano R Tonelli
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.017

9.  Effect of COVID-19 on computed tomography usage and critical test results in the emergency department: an observational study.

Authors:  Minu Agarwal; Amar Udare; Michael Patlas; Milita Ramonas; Amer A Alaref; Radu Rozenberg; Donald L Ly; Dmitry S Golev; Ken Mascola; Christian B van der Pol
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-09-14

Review 10.  Thrombosis in COVID-19.

Authors:  Thomas C Hanff; Amir M Mohareb; Jay Giri; Jordana B Cohen; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 10.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.