Literature DB >> 32857954

Early intervention for people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Gayatri Saraf1, Ehsan Moazen-Zadeh2, Jairo Vinícius Pinto3, Kimia Ziafat1, Ivan J Torres4, Muralidharan Kesavan5, Lakshmi N Yatham6.   

Abstract

Early intervention approaches are built on the premise of preventing disability, burden, and cognitive sequelae caused by bipolar disorder. The objective of this systematic review was to characterise the effectiveness of all the available psychological and pharmacological treatments for early intervention in people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019133420). We did a systematic search to identify studies published in ten databases up to March 27, 2020. Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that assessed the effect of pharmacological or psychological interventions in people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder were included. Studies of first episodes of mania were excluded. Eligible papers were assessed for quality and data were extracted. The primary outcomes were change in manic and depressive symptoms from baseline to endpoint. Of the 2856 citations retrieved by our search, 16 studies were included; five evaluated pharmacotherapeutic strategies (three randomised controlled trials and two open-label studies), ten assessed psychotherapeutic strategies (four randomised controlled trials and six open-label studies), and one randomised controlled trial assessed combination therapy; these 16 trials included a total of 755 participants at high risk of developing bipolar disorder. Quality assessment indicated fair to good quality for open-label studies, and a high risk of bias in four randomised controlled trials. Among the pharmacotherapeutic interventions, there is preliminary support for the efficacy of aripiprazole in reducing mood symptoms in people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder. Psychological interventions were effective for various outcomes. There was substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies. This systematic review underscores the need for multicentre, prospective, methodologically homogeneous studies evaluating conversion to bipolar disorder as an outcome measure.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32857954     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30188-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  3 in total

1.  Before Schizophrenia: Schizophrenic Vulnerability in Developmental Age and Its Detection.

Authors:  Michele Poletti; Andrea Raballo
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2021-12

2.  Alterations in blood proteins in the prodromal stage of bipolar II disorders.

Authors:  Hyunju Lee; Dohyun Han; Sang Jin Rhee; Jayoun Kim; Yunna Lee; Eun Young Kim; Dong Yeon Park; Sungwon Roh; Myungjae Baik; Hee Yeon Jung; Junhee Lee; Tae Young Lee; Minah Kim; Hyunsuk Shin; Hyeyoon Kim; Se Hyun Kim; Jun Soo Kwon; Yong Min Ahn; Kyooseob Ha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Alterations in the Plasma Lipidome of Adult Women With Bipolar Disorder: A Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics Research.

Authors:  Lin Guo; Ting Zhang; Rui Li; Zhi-Quan Cui; Jing Du; Jia-Bin Yang; Fen Xue; Yi-Huan Chen; Qing-Rong Tan; Zheng-Wu Peng
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.