Literature DB >> 32856723

Patient demographic and psychosocial characteristics associated with 30-day recall of self-reported lower urinary tract symptoms.

Kathryn E Flynn1, Sarah A Mansfield2, Abigail R Smith2, Brenda W Gillespie3, Catherine S Bradley4, David Cella5, Margaret E Helmuth2, H Henry Lai6, Ziya Kirkali7, Pooja Talaty8, James W Griffith5, Kevin P Weinfurt9.   

Abstract

AIMS: Measurement of self-reported lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) typically uses a recall period, for example, "In the past 30 days…." Compared to averaged daily reports, 30-day recall is generally unbiased, but recall bias varies by item. We examined the associations between personal characteristics (eg, age, symptom bother) and 30-day recall of LUTS using items from the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Comprehensive Assessment of Self-reported Urinary Symptoms questionnaire.
METHODS: Participants (127 women and 127 men) were recruited from 6 US tertiary care sites. They completed daily assessments for 30 days and a 30-day recall assessment at the end of the study month. For each of the 18 tested items, representing 10 LUTS, the average of the participant's daily responses was modeled as a function of their 30-day recall, the personal characteristic, and the interaction between the 30-day recall and the characteristic in separate general linear regression models, adjusted for sex.
RESULTS: Nine items representing 7 LUTS exhibited under- or overreporting (recall bias) for at least 25% of participants. Bias was associated with personal characteristics for six LUTS. Underreporting of incontinence was associated with older age, lower anxiety, and negative affect; overreporting of other LUTS was associated with, symptom bother, symptom variability, anxiety, and depression.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified under- or overreporting that was associated with personal characteristics for six common LUTS. Some cues (eg, less bother and lower anxiety) were related to recall bias in an unexpected direction. Thus, providers should exercise caution when making judgments about the accuracy of a patient's symptom recall based on patient demographic and psychosocial characteristics.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  humans; lower urinary tract symptoms; measurement; mental recall; patient‐reported outcomes; self‐report; urination

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32856723      PMCID: PMC8220594          DOI: 10.1002/nau.24461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  21 in total

1.  The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire: www.iciq.net.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Kerry Avery; Nikki Gardener; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The daily diary and the questionnaire are not equivalent for the evaluation of bowel habits.

Authors:  Massimo Bellini; Antonio Bove; Maria Pia Sormani; Edda Battaglia; Renato Bocchini; Pietro Alduini; Gabrio Bassotti; Paolo Bruzzi; Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 4.088

3.  The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association.

Authors:  M J Barry; F J Fowler; M P O'Leary; R C Bruskewitz; H L Holtgrewe; W K Mebust; A T Cockett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  What is a clinician to do-believe the patient or her urinary diary?

Authors:  Kimberly Kenton; Mary Pat Fitzgerald; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The Comprehensive Assessment of Self-Reported Urinary Symptoms: A New Tool for Research on Subtypes of Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; James W Griffith; Kathryn E Flynn; David Cella; Tamara Bavendam; Jonathan B Wiseman; Victor P Andreev; H Henry Lai; Alice B Liu; Ziya Kirkali; Anne P Cameron; Catherine S Bradley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joseph E Schwartz; Joan E Broderick; Saul S Shiffman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-10

7.  Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger.

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Seung W Choi; Steven P Reise; Angela M Stover; William T Riley; David Cella
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2011-06-21

8.  Women overestimate daytime urinary frequency: the importance of the bladder diary.

Authors:  Kobi Stav; Peter L Dwyer; Anna Rosamilia
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Temporal trends in symptom experience predict the accuracy of recall PROs.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Joan E Broderick; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joseph E Schwartz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Anxiety sensitivity and interoceptive exposure: a transdiagnostic construct and change strategy.

Authors:  James F Boswell; Todd J Farchione; Shannon Sauer-Zavala; Heather W Murray; Meghan R Fortune; David H Barlow
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2013-04-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of weekly and daily recall of pain as an endpoint in a randomized phase 3 trial of cabozantinib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Schaffer; Ethan M Basch; Gisela M Schwab; Antonia V Bennett
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.486

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.