Kobi Stav1, Peter L Dwyer, Anna Rosamilia. 1. Department of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. stavkobi@yahoo.com.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined whether women with urinary incontinence reliably report urinary frequency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,136 women who underwent a suburethral sling operation from 1999 to 2007. A routine form was used to document medical history, urinary symptoms, physical examination and urodynamics. A total of 601 patients with a mean +/- SD age of 59.2 +/- 11.6 years (range 30 to 91) who completed a bladder diary were included in this study. Patients were categorized into 4 levels of urinary frequency, and medical histories and bladder diaries were compared. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the degree of agreement between histories and diaries. RESULTS: According to the diaries 535 patients (89%) voided 4 to 10 times during the day and 527 (87.6%) voided no more than twice at night. Only 47% of the women were accurate about daytime frequency. On the other hand, 93% of the women were accurate about the nighttime estimation. Of the women 51% overestimated daytime frequency. Overestimation was marked, especially in patients who reported a daytime frequency of greater than 10 voids per day. There was weak correlation between daytime urinary frequency obtained from medical histories and the frequency recorded in diaries (r = 0.31, p = 0.011). However, nighttime urinary frequencies correlated highly (r = 0.79, p = 0.02). Overestimation rates were similar in patients with and without overactive bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that half of patients tend to overestimate daytime urinary frequency. However, the accuracy rate of nighttime frequency is much higher. A bladder diary provides invaluable information about urinary frequency and it should be an integral part of the routine assessment in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.
PURPOSE: We determined whether women with urinary incontinence reliably report urinary frequency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,136 women who underwent a suburethral sling operation from 1999 to 2007. A routine form was used to document medical history, urinary symptoms, physical examination and urodynamics. A total of 601 patients with a mean +/- SD age of 59.2 +/- 11.6 years (range 30 to 91) who completed a bladder diary were included in this study. Patients were categorized into 4 levels of urinary frequency, and medical histories and bladder diaries were compared. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the degree of agreement between histories and diaries. RESULTS: According to the diaries 535 patients (89%) voided 4 to 10 times during the day and 527 (87.6%) voided no more than twice at night. Only 47% of the women were accurate about daytime frequency. On the other hand, 93% of the women were accurate about the nighttime estimation. Of the women 51% overestimated daytime frequency. Overestimation was marked, especially in patients who reported a daytime frequency of greater than 10 voids per day. There was weak correlation between daytime urinary frequency obtained from medical histories and the frequency recorded in diaries (r = 0.31, p = 0.011). However, nighttime urinary frequencies correlated highly (r = 0.79, p = 0.02). Overestimation rates were similar in patients with and without overactive bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that half of patients tend to overestimate daytime urinary frequency. However, the accuracy rate of nighttime frequency is much higher. A bladder diary provides invaluable information about urinary frequency and it should be an integral part of the routine assessment in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Authors: Kathryn E Flynn; Sarah A Mansfield; Abigail R Smith; Brenda W Gillespie; Catherine S Bradley; David Cella; J Quentin Clemens; Margaret E Helmuth; H Henry Lai; Ziya Kirkali; Pooja Talaty; Kevin P Weinfurt Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Laura N Nguyen; Jamie Bartley; Kim A Killinger; Priyanka Gupta; John Lavin; Ayad Khourdaji; Jason Gilleran; Natalie Gaines; Judith A Boura; Kenneth M Peters Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Catherine S Bradley; Jeanette S Brown; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Michael Schembri; Arona Ragins; David H Thom Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Kathryn E Flynn; Sarah A Mansfield; Abigail R Smith; Brenda W Gillespie; Catherine S Bradley; David Cella; Margaret E Helmuth; H Henry Lai; Ziya Kirkali; Pooja Talaty; James W Griffith; Kevin P Weinfurt Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 2.696