Jannike Øyen1, Eli Kristin Aadland2,3, Bjørn Liaset2, Even Fjære2, Lisbeth Dahl2, Lise Madsen2,4. 1. Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817, Bergen, Norway. jannike.oyen@hi.no. 2. Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817, Bergen, Norway. 3. Department of Sport, Food and Natural Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Bergen, Norway. 4. Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Iodine deficiency due to insufficient nutritional intake is a public health challenge in several European countries, including Norway. Lean-seafood has a high iodine and arsenic (As) content and is a good source of selenium (Se). Evidence of a direct effect of increased intake of lean-seafood on iodine status is limited. The main aims were to determine the iodine status at baseline and to investigate possible dietary effects on urinary iodine concentration (UIC) after intervention with lean-seafood versus non-seafood. Plasma Se, and plasma and urinary As concentrations were also measured. METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover study comprising two 4 weeks experimental periods with two balanced diets varied in main proteins (60% of total dietary proteins) of lean-seafood and non-seafood, separated by a 5 week washout period. RESULTS:Twenty participants (7 males, 13 females) were included and the mean ±SD age was 50.6 ± 15.3 years for all participants. Fasting UIC was median (25th, 75th percentile) 70 (38, 110) and 79 (49, 94) µg/L in the lean-seafood and non-seafood intervention at baseline, respectively. UIC increased after 4 weeks of the lean-seafood intervention to 135 (110, 278) µg/L, but not after the non-seafood intervention [58 (33, 91) µg/L] (P diet-effect < 0.001). Fasting plasma Se increased in the lean-seafood intervention and decreased in the non-seafood intervention (P diet-effect = 0.001). Fasting urinary and plasma As increased in the lean-seafood intervention and was unchanged in the non-seafood intervention (P diet-effect < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The participant's UIC was below the recommended median (100 µg/L) at baseline, but increased sufficiently after a 4 week intervention with lean-seafood.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Iodine deficiency due to insufficient nutritional intake is a public health challenge in several European countries, including Norway. Lean-seafood has a high iodine and arsenic (As) content and is a good source of selenium (Se). Evidence of a direct effect of increased intake of lean-seafood on iodine status is limited. The main aims were to determine the iodine status at baseline and to investigate possible dietary effects on urinary iodine concentration (UIC) after intervention with lean-seafood versus non-seafood. Plasma Se, and plasma and urinary As concentrations were also measured. METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover study comprising two 4 weeks experimental periods with two balanced diets varied in main proteins (60% of total dietary proteins) of lean-seafood and non-seafood, separated by a 5 week washout period. RESULTS: Twenty participants (7 males, 13 females) were included and the mean ± SD age was 50.6 ± 15.3 years for all participants. Fasting UIC was median (25th, 75th percentile) 70 (38, 110) and 79 (49, 94) µg/L in the lean-seafood and non-seafood intervention at baseline, respectively. UIC increased after 4 weeks of the lean-seafood intervention to 135 (110, 278) µg/L, but not after the non-seafood intervention [58 (33, 91) µg/L] (P diet-effect < 0.001). Fasting plasma Se increased in the lean-seafood intervention and decreased in the non-seafood intervention (P diet-effect = 0.001). Fasting urinary and plasma As increased in the lean-seafood intervention and was unchanged in the non-seafood intervention (P diet-effect < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The participant's UIC was below the recommended median (100 µg/L) at baseline, but increased sufficiently after a 4 week intervention with lean-seafood.
Authors: Ingibjorg Gunnarsdottir; Anita G Gustavsdottir; Laufey Steingrimsdottir; Amund Maage; Ari J Johannesson; Inga Thorsdottir Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Isabelle Herter-Aeberli; Mohamed Cherkaoui; Nawal El Ansari; Riccarda Rohner; Sara Stinca; Laila Chabaa; Arnold von Eckardstein; Abdelmounaim Aboussad; Michael B Zimmermann Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Helena Filipsson Nyström; Anne Lise Brantsæter; Iris Erlund; Ingibjörg Gunnarsdottir; Lena Hulthén; Peter Laurberg; Irene Mattisson; Lone Banke Rasmussen; Suvi Virtanen; Helle Margrete Meltzer Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kristin S Hustad; Inger Ottestad; Thomas Olsen; Thomas Sæther; Stine M Ulven; Kirsten B Holven Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.865