John Danziger1, Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz2,3,4, Leo Anthony Celi5,3, Robert A Cohen5, Kenneth J Mukamal5. 1. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts jdanzige@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Cardiovascular Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Critical Data, Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 4. Biomedical Engineering and Telemedicine Group, Center for Biomedical Technology, Escuela Tecnica Superior de Ingenieros Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite having high comorbidity rates and shortened life expectancy, patients with ESKD may harbor unrealistically optimistic expectations about their prognoses. Whether this affects resuscitation orders is unknown. METHODS: To determine whether do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders differ among patients with ESKD compared with other critically ill patients, including those with diseases of other major organs, we investigated DNR orders on admission to intensive care units (ICUs) among 106,873 patients in the United States. RESULTS: Major organ disease uniformly associated with increased risk of hospital mortality, particularly for cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.30 to 3.08), and ESKD (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.65). Compared with critically ill patients without major organ disease, patients with stroke, cancer, heart failure, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cirrhosis were statistically more likely to have a DNR order on ICU admission; those with ESKD were not. Findings were similar when comparing patients with a single organ disease with those without organ disease. The disconnect between prognosis and DNR use was most notable among Black patients, for whom ESKD (compared with no major organ disease) was associated with a 62% (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.04) higher odds of hospital mortality, but no appreciable difference in DNR utilization (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike patients with diseases of other major organs, critically ill patients with ESKD were not more likely to have a DNR order than patients without ESKD. Whether this reflects a greater lack of advance care planning in the nephrology community, as well as a missed opportunity to minimize potentially needless patient suffering, requires further study.
BACKGROUND: Despite having high comorbidity rates and shortened life expectancy, patients with ESKD may harbor unrealistically optimistic expectations about their prognoses. Whether this affects resuscitation orders is unknown. METHODS: To determine whether do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders differ among patients with ESKD compared with other critically illpatients, including those with diseases of other major organs, we investigated DNR orders on admission to intensive care units (ICUs) among 106,873 patients in the United States. RESULTS: Major organ disease uniformly associated with increased risk of hospital mortality, particularly for cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.30 to 3.08), and ESKD (aOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.65). Compared with critically illpatients without major organ disease, patients with stroke, cancer, heart failure, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cirrhosis were statistically more likely to have a DNR order on ICU admission; those with ESKD were not. Findings were similar when comparing patients with a single organ disease with those without organ disease. The disconnect between prognosis and DNR use was most notable among Black patients, for whom ESKD (compared with no major organ disease) was associated with a 62% (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.04) higher odds of hospital mortality, but no appreciable difference in DNR utilization (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike patients with diseases of other major organs, critically illpatients with ESKD were not more likely to have a DNR order than patients without ESKD. Whether this reflects a greater lack of advance care planning in the nephrology community, as well as a missed opportunity to minimize potentially needless patient suffering, requires further study.
Authors: Nwamaka D Eneanya; Kabir Olaniran; Dihua Xu; Katherine Waite; Stanley Crittenden; D Bora Hazar; Angelo E Volandes; Jennifer S Temel; Ravi Thadhani; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2018
Authors: Jane O Schell; Uptal D Patel; Karen E Steinhauser; Natalie Ammarell; James A Tulsky Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Melissa W Wachterman; Corey Pilver; Dawn Smith; Mary Ersek; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Karly A Murphy; Raquel C Greer; Debra L Roter; Deidra C Crews; Patti L Ephraim; Kathryn A Carson; Lisa A Cooper; Michael C Albert; L Ebony Boulware Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 5.128