Literature DB >> 22221483

Discussions of the kidney disease trajectory by elderly patients and nephrologists: a qualitative study.

Jane O Schell1, Uptal D Patel, Karen E Steinhauser, Natalie Ammarell, James A Tulsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with advanced kidney disease experience considerable disability, morbidity, and mortality. Little is known about the impact of physician-patient interactions on patient preparation for the illness trajectory. We sought to describe how nephrologists and older patients discuss and understand the prognosis and course of kidney disease leading to renal replacement therapy.
METHODS: We conducted focus groups and interviews with 11 nephrologists and 29 patients older than 65 years with advanced chronic kidney disease or receiving hemodialysis. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. We used qualitative analytic methods to identify common and recurrent themes related to the primary research question.
RESULTS: We identified 6 themes that describe how the kidney disease trajectory is discussed and understood: (1) patients are shocked by their diagnosis, (2) patients are uncertain how their disease will progress, (3) patients lack preparation for living with dialysis, (4) nephrologists struggle to explain illness complexity, (5) nephrologists manage a disease over which they have little control, and (6) nephrologists tend to avoid discussions of the future. Patients and nephrologists acknowledged that prognosis discussions are rare. Patients tended to cope with thoughts of the future through avoidance by focusing on their present clinical status. Nephrologists reported uncertainty and concern for evoking negative reactions as barriers to these conversations.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and nephrologists face challenges in understanding and preparing for the kidney disease trajectory. Communication interventions that acknowledge the role of patient emotion and address uncertainty may improve how nephrologists discuss disease trajectory with patients and thereby enhance their understanding and preparation for the future. Copyright Â
© 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22221483      PMCID: PMC3626427          DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  40 in total

1.  Stressors, coping mechanisms and quality of life among dialysis patients in Australia.

Authors:  P Lok
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

3.  Existential and supportive care needs among patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Sara N Davison; Gian S Jhangri
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  When enough is enough: the nephrologist's responsibility in ordering dialysis treatments.

Authors:  Michael J Germain; Sara N Davison; Alvin H Moss
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  The patient-physician relationship. Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: an observational study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; M J Muller; L D Wever; J H Schornagel; N K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  "Is there life on dialysis?": time and aging in a clinically sustained existence.

Authors:  Ann J Russ; Janet K Shim; Sharon R Kaufman
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

7.  Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know?

Authors:  P N Butow; S Dowsett; R Hagerty; M H N Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Anxiety disorders in adults treated by hemodialysis: a single-center study.

Authors:  Daniel Cukor; Jeremy Coplan; Clinton Brown; Steven Friedman; Howard Newville; Michal Safier; Lisa A Spielman; Rolf A Peterson; Paul L Kimmel
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Communication about cancer near the end of life.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Wendy G Anderson; Lynn Bunch; Lisa A Marr; James A Wallace; Holly B Yang; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Communication and decision-making about prognosis in heart failure care.

Authors:  Sarah J Goodlin; Timothy E Quill; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.712

View more
  91 in total

1.  Achieving a person-centered approach to dialysis discontinuation: An historical perspective.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare; Emma Murphy; Catherine R Butler; Claire A Richards
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Impact of hearing loss on clinical interactions between older adults and health professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 1.710

3.  Vascular access for hemodialysis in older adults: a "patient first" approach.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  The patient perspective and physician's role in making decisions on instituting dialysis.

Authors:  Manjula Kurella Tamura; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Considerations in starting a patient with advanced frailty on dialysis: complex biology meets challenging ethics.

Authors:  Mark Swidler
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Prediction of Risk of Death for Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan T Anderson; Hailey Cleek; Atieh S Pajouhi; M Fernanda Bellolio; Ananya Mayukha; Allyson Hart; LaTonya J Hickson; Molly A Feely; Michael E Wilson; Ryan M Giddings Connolly; Patricia J Erwin; Abdul M Majzoub; Navdeep Tangri; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.

Authors:  Andrei D Javier; Rocio Figueroa; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Jennifer Morse; Thomas G Stewart; Rakesh Malhotra; Manisha Jhamb; Jane O Schell; Cesar Y Cardona; Cathy A Maxwell; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  When All You Have Is a Hammer: The Need for Tools to Define and Apply Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis.

Authors:  C Barrett Bowling; Laura C Plantinga
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Discussing Conservative Management With Older Patients With CKD: An Interview Study of Nephrologists.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Renuka Pandya; Allison Kannam; Rohini Loke; Tira Oskoui; Ronald D Perrone; Klemens B Meyer; Daniel E Weiner; John B Wong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  A simple tool to predict end-stage renal disease within 1 year in elderly adults with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Paul E Drawz; Puja Goswami; Reem Azem; Denise C Babineau; Mahboob Rahman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.