| Literature DB >> 32853320 |
Mauricio J Farfan1, Juan P Torres2, Miguel O'Ryan3, Mauricio Olivares2, Pablo Gallardo2, Jorge Lastra1, Carolina Salas1.
Abstract
The global shortage of reagents and kits for nucleic acid extraction and molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 requires new cost-effective strategies for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 cases, especially in countries that need to increase detection capacity. Pooled nucleic acid testing has been extensively used as a cost-effective strategy for HIV, HepB, HepC and influenza. Also, protocols dispensing of RNA extraction appears as an attractive option for detection of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we found that pooling of 5 samples showed that CT variations were in the range of 1.0-4,5 units, with less likelihood of a false negative result. Results of the sample without nucleic acid ex-traction, was unsatisfactory, with a significant increase in CT values, and thus for risk of a false negative result. In conclusion, pooling nasopharyngeal samples with both automated and manual extraction proved reliable, and thus a potential efficient alternative for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 in developing countries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32853320 DOI: 10.4067/s0716-10182020000300276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Chilena Infectol ISSN: 0716-1018 Impact factor: 0.520