| Literature DB >> 32853134 |
Anne-Sophie Le Guern1,2,3, Cyril Savin1,3,2,4, Hilde Angermeier5,2, Sylvie Brémont3,1,2, Dominique Clermont6, Estelle Mühle6, Petya Orozova7, Hristo Najdenski8, Javier Pizarro-Cerdá1,2,3.
Abstract
Thirty-three Yersinia strains previously characterized by the French Yersinia National Reference Laboratory (YNRL) and isolated from humans and animals were suspected to belong to six novel species by a recently described core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme. These strains and five additional strains from the YNRL were characterized using a polyphasic taxonomic approach including a phylogenetic analysis based on 500 core genes, determination of average nucleotide identity (ANI), determination of DNA G+C content and identification of phenotypic features. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the 38 studied strains formed six well-demarcated clades. ANI values between these clades and their closest relatives were <94.7 % and ANI values within each putative novel species were >97.5 %. Distinctive biochemical characteristics were identified in five out of the six novel species. All of these data demonstrated that the 38 strains belong to six novel species of the genus Yersinia: Yersinia artesiana sp. nov., type strain IP42281T (=CIP 111845T=DSM 110725T); Yersinia proxima sp. nov., type strain IP37424T (=CIP 111847T=DSM 110727T); Yersinia alsatica sp. nov., type strain IP38850T (=CIP 111848T=DSM 110726T); Yersinia vastinensis sp. nov., type strain IP38594T (=CIP 111844T=DSM 110738T); Yersinia thracica sp. nov., type strain IP34646T (=CIP 111842T=DSM 110736T); and Yersinia occitanica sp. nov., type strain IP35638T (=CIP 111843T=DSM 110739T).Entities:
Keywords: Yersinia; Yersiniaceae; cgMLST; species
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32853134 PMCID: PMC7660898 DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ISSN: 1466-5026 Impact factor: 2.747
Strains belonging to the six novel species
|
cgMLST clade |
Proposed novel species |
Strain |
Phenotypic characterization |
Assembly accession number |
Isolation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Species |
Serotype |
Source |
Material |
Country |
Area |
Year | ||||
|
NEW 3 |
|
IP39904 |
|
Not typeable |
GCA_902170805.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Halennes les Haubourdin |
2018 |
|
IP41384 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902726525 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Le Haillan |
2019 | |||
|
IP42281T |
Not typeable |
GCA_902726545 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Barlin |
2019 | |||
|
IP42750 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902726535 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Volckerinckhove |
2019 | |||
|
NEW 4 |
|
IP37424T |
|
O:10-34 |
GCA_902170785.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Saint Laurent de la Salanque |
2016 |
|
IP37838 |
O:10-34 |
GCA_902170665.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Chalon sur Saône |
2016 | |||
|
IP38046 |
O:10-34 |
GCA_902171005.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Limoges |
2016 | |||
|
IP38191 |
O:10 |
GCA_902170985.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Besançon |
2016 | |||
|
IP38663 |
O:10-34 |
GCA_902170895.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Toulouse |
2017 | |||
|
IP38819 |
O:10 |
GCA_902170975.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Cholet |
2017 | |||
|
IP38868 |
O:34 |
GCA_902170815.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Levallois Perret |
2017 | |||
|
IP38950 |
O:10-34 |
GCA_902170945.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Levallois Perret |
2017 | |||
|
IP39432 |
O:6,31 |
GCA_902170955.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Angoulême |
2017 | |||
|
IP39924 |
O:10-34 |
GCA_902170885.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Metz |
2016 | |||
|
|
|
IP35553 |
|
O:52-52,53 |
GCA_902170365.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Le Puy en Velay |
2013 |
|
IP37124 |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170395.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Levallois Perret |
2015 | |||
|
IP37802 |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170375.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Strasbourg |
2016 | |||
|
IP38166 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902170345.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Levallois Perret |
2016 | |||
|
IP38403 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902170385.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Strasbourg |
2016 | |||
|
IP38767 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902170275.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Nancy |
2017 | |||
|
IP38850T |
O:40 |
GCA_902170305.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Strasbourg |
2017 | |||
|
IP39458 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902170285.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Brumath |
2017 | |||
|
IP39797 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902170325.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Strasbourg |
2017 | |||
|
|
|
IP37831 |
|
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170405.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Romilly sur Seine |
2016 |
|
IP38006 |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170245.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Rodez |
2016 | |||
|
IP38178 |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170255.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Brumath |
2016 | |||
|
IP38594T |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902726565 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Nemours |
2017 | |||
|
IP38831 |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170295.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Rethel |
2017 | |||
|
|
|
IP6945 |
|
O:16 |
GCA_001123825.1 |
Pig |
Stool |
Germany |
Unknown |
1977 |
|
IP34646T |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170565.1 |
Fish |
Unknown |
Bulgaria |
Sofia |
2012 | |||
|
IP35448 |
O:16-16,29 |
GCA_902170455.1 |
Bird |
Unknown |
Bulgaria |
Sofia |
2013 | |||
|
IP42199 |
Not typeable |
GCA_902726555 |
Wild boar |
Stool |
Italy |
Parma |
2019 | |||
|
|
|
IP28581 |
|
O:12,25-12,26 |
GCA_902170535.1 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
2005 |
|
IP35638T |
O:12,25-12,26 |
GCA_902170605.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Rodez |
2014 | |||
|
IP37484 |
O:12,25-12,26 |
GCA_902170505.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Draguignan |
2014 | |||
|
IP38487 |
O:12,25-12,26 |
GCA_902170595.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Saint Mandé |
2016 | |||
|
IP38810 |
O:12,25-12,26 |
GCA_902170465.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Romilly sur Seine |
2017 | |||
|
IP38921 |
O:12,25-12,26 |
GCA_902170475.1 |
Human |
Stool |
France |
Saumur |
2017 | |||
a, According to Savin et al. [20]; b, this study.
Fig. 1.Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Yersinia (242 strains) based on 500 concatenated multiple sequence alignments. Boostrap support values are shown close to the branches. Bar, 0.01 amino acid substitutions per character.
Average nucleotide identity (ANI) matrix for the 38 genomes: nine 2 strains; five 3 strains; four 2 strains; six 3 strains; four NEW 3 strains, 10 NEW 4 strains
|
|
*Clade name according to Savin et al. [20].
Distinctive biochemical characteristics between the six novel species and the other species and subspecies (except )
BT, biotype; +, 90 % or more strains positive; −, 90 % or more strains negative; d, 11–89 % of strains positive.
|
|