Literature DB >> 32852882

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oral biopsies in the Brazilian National Health System.

Amanda Ramos da Cunha1, José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes2, Manoela Domingues Martins1, Stefano Petti3, Fernando Neves Hugo1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; biopsy; coronavirus infections; head and neck neoplasms; mouth neoplasms; pandemics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32852882      PMCID: PMC7461360          DOI: 10.1111/odi.13620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   4.068


× No keyword cloud information.
The COVID‐19 pandemic is profoundly impacting health systems around the world. Since January 2020, the need to ensure care for cases of the new disease and to contain contagion has resulted in restrictions to healthcare provision (Remuzzi & Remuzzi, 2020). The fear of being exposed to contamination by the new coronavirus may also have led individuals to avoid seeking for health care, even facing symptoms that should not be neglected (Olmo, Martínez, Ramos, Maroto, & Diaz, 2020). Up until now, the healthcare community concentrated its efforts in the development of biosafety protocols (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 2020; Volgenant, Persoon, de Ruijter, & de Soet, 2020), definition of what constitutes elective care during the pandemic (American Dental Association, 2020), and use of alternatives to traditional, “in office” care, such as telehealth (Smith et al., 2020; Wosik et al., 2020). Nevertheless, all these initiatives may not be sufficient to guarantee that the health systems worldwide provide timely care to all diseases, while it is struggling to contain and treat COVID‐19. The diagnosis of oral cancer in early stages is one of the most critical factors related to the patient's survival (Dantas et al., 2016) and to the severity of mutilation that the individual can experience as part of surgical treatment. An incisional biopsy with histological assessment is the standard procedure for diagnosing oral cancer (Macey et al., 2015). The American Dental Association (ADA) indicates that biopsies of abnormal tissues of the mouth constitute urgent dental care, being a condition that requires immediate attention (American Dental Association, 2020). In this scenario, we aimed to document the impact of the new coronavirus pandemic on the number of biopsies in the soft tissues of the mouth performed in Brazil's National Health System, the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). SUS classifies biopsies of the soft tissue of the mouth as a medium complexity procedure, which can be executed on an outpatient or hospital service by physicians or dentists (Ministry of Health of Brazil, 2020a). In 2019, SUS performed 23,110 mouth biopsies; to have a dimension of this amount, 15,210 new cases of oral cancer are estimated for the country for 2020 (Ministry of Health of Brazil, 2020b). SUS’s Ambulatory Information System (SIA‐SUS) collects data about medium complexity procedures all over the country and makes information available anonymously and publicly. The number of biopsies in the soft tissues of the mouth (ICD‐10 codes C00‐C06) during the initial months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Brazil—from March to May of 2020—was retrieved from SIA‐SUS; data from May were the latest available when this analysis was carried out. Data on biopsies carried out between March and May of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were also retrieved from SIA‐SUS for comparison. The data were gathered by Brazilian State (26 States and the Federal District of Brazil) where the biopsy was performed. Brazil notified its first case of COVID‐19 on February 29, and the number one death with a confirmed diagnosis occurred on March 17. The country reached the milestone of 1,000 deaths from this disease on April 10. At the time of this study's finish—in the first half of August—the country has accumulated more than 3 million reported cases and more than 104 thousand deaths (Ministry of Health of Brazil, 2020c). The results of the present study showed an alarming decrease in the rate of mouth biopsies in all Brazilian regions in 2020, considering the average of March, April, and May, when compared with previous years (Figure 1). The comparison between the same periods of the years 2019 and 2020 indicated a decrease of 68.8% in these rates for the entire country, with all regions showing a decline of over 60% (Table 1). This is a disquieting situation, as the real number of oral cancer cases and potentially malignant lesions that need diagnosis will not reduce in the pandemic scenario. For a disease with rapid evolution such as oral cancer, the lack of diagnostic procedures for a brief time will possibly result in diagnosis of tumors in more advanced stages. Late diagnosis of oral cancer reduces the chances of survival more than 200% (Seoane et al., 2016); this situation becomes even more relevant when we consider that, in a non‐pandemic setting, only 40%–50% of patients with oral cancer survive after five years (Dantas et al., 2016).
Figure 1

Average monthly rate of biopsies (per 100,000 inhabitants) of March to May, by Brazilian regions

Table 1

Number of biopsies and average monthly biopsy rate (per 100,000 inhabitants) of March to May, by Brazilian regions

Region (n. FU)March‐May 2019March‐May 2020Rate Change (%)
n. BiopsiesBiopsy Rate n. BiopsiesBiopsy Rate
North (n. 7)2490.37950.09−75.3
Northeast (n. 9)6810.352550.12−66.6
Southeast (n. 4)3,4621.159830.28−75.6
South (n. 3)1,3351.535040.56−63.3
Midwest (n. 4)2410.56720.18−67.0
Brazil (n. 27)5,9680.7919090.25−68.8

Abbreviations: FU, federation unity; n, number of.

Average monthly rate of biopsies (per 100,000 inhabitants) of March to May, by Brazilian regions Number of biopsies and average monthly biopsy rate (per 100,000 inhabitants) of March to May, by Brazilian regions Abbreviations: FU, federation unity; n, number of. The most pronounced decline in 2020 occurred in the Southeast region, followed by the South (Figure 1). The comparison between 2019 and 2020 indicated a decrease of 75.6% in the Southeast (Table 1). Southeast is the most developed region of the country, with the best‐structured health system (Bigoni, Antunes, Weiderpass, & Kjærheim, 2019), and was unable to maintain even half of its biopsy rate during the pandemic. North, Northeast, and Midwest had the lowest biopsy rates in 2019 (Figure 2), which makes their decrease even more alarming, as there was possibly not enough diagnosis even before the pandemic. When analyzed by sex and age, the decrease in biopsy rates was homogeneous between the different groups: 75.3%, 62.5%, and 62.8% of reduction, respectively, for children and adolescents, adults, and elderly males; 76.1%, 71.7%, and 70.0%, respectively, for the same age groups of female individuals.
Figure 2

Average biopsy rate for March, April, and May (per 100,000 inhabitants), by Brazilian states. The black lines delimit the states of Brazil; the red lines delimit the regions of Brazil

Average biopsy rate for March, April, and May (per 100,000 inhabitants), by Brazilian states. The black lines delimit the states of Brazil; the red lines delimit the regions of Brazil In line with these national data, the number of oral specimens collected in the Diagnostic Center for Oral Diseases (DCOD) of the Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil, between March and April 2020, was 69.9% lower than in the same period of the year 2019. More specifically, potentially malignant disorders (i.e., oral dysplasia and carcinoma in situ) and oral squamous cell carcinoma, that accounted for 8.8% and 7.4% of all diagnoses in the pre‐COVID‐19 era, decreased by 89% and 44%, respectively (Gomes, Schuch, Tarquinio, Etges, & Vasconcelos, 2020). Arbitrarily extending this local scenario to the whole country, 467 diagnoses of potentially malignant disorders and 194 diagnoses of oral squamous cell carcinoma would be missing in just three months, suggesting a considerable increase in the burden of oral cancer in Brazil in forthcoming years. This alarming situation is due to an overall general decrease in outpatient visits in oral medicine centers in Brazil. For example, in the A.C. Camargo Cancer Center of São Paulo, oral medicine visits decreased by 53.2% in the first six weeks of lockdown compared to the last six weeks before the lockdown (Alves et al., 2020). These data reveal the worrying scenario that the COVID‐19 pandemic has been outlining for oral cancer care and are compatible with some findings that are beginning to emerge in other countries. During the outbreak in Italy, a referral service for diagnosis of oral cancer in Turin diagnosed only 1/7 of the new cancer cases they expected to identify (Arduino, Conrotto, & Broccoletti, 2020). Following its natural history, oral cancer will continue to affect the population; the new reality will not impact its pace. However, the profoundly altered health system will miss several opportunities for early diagnosis and will have to manage this repressed demand in more advanced stages of the disease. Part of this pent‐up demand may evolve into increase in mortality, that was stable in Brazil in the last decades (Perea, Peres, Boing, & Antunes, 2018). When health systems collapse and fail, people respond with suffering and death. Monitoring the health system's productivity during the pandemic period is critical to reducing adverse outcomes at the population level. The pandemics' prejudicial impact on the system of health may linger for a more extended period than expected. Shedding light on the problem and raising awareness of the need to resume diagnostic routines is critical to oral cancer management and control; this report is a call for action, without disregarding biosafety measures imposed by the new reality. Recording the loss of efficiency of healthcare procedures aimed at other diseases during the pandemics may allow health policy and planning to counterbalance the impact of COVID‐19 on oral cancer trends.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None to declare.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Amanda Ramos da Cunha: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Writing‐original draft; Writing‐review & editing. Jose Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing‐original draft; Writing‐review & editing. Manoela Domingues Martins: Conceptualization; Investigation; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing‐review & editing. Stefano Petti: Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing‐review & editing. Fernando Neves Hugo: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Writing‐original draft; Writing‐review & editing.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/odi.13620.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Early oral cancer diagnosis: The Aarhus statement perspective. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Seoane; Pablo Alvarez-Novoa; Iria Gomez; Bahi Takkouche; Pedro Diz; Saman Warnakulasiruya; Juan M Seoane-Romero; Pablo Varela-Centelles
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Perceived vulnerability to Coronavirus infection: impact on dental practice.

Authors:  María José González-Olmo; Ana Raquel Ortega-Martínez; Bendición Delgado-Ramos; Martín Romero-Maroto; María Carrillo-Diaz
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2020-05-08

Review 3.  Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Paul Brocklehurst; Alexander R Kerr; Joseph L Y Liu; Mark W Lingen; Graham R Ogden; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Crispian Scully
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-29

4.  Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.

Authors:  Jedrek Wosik; Marat Fudim; Blake Cameron; Ziad F Gellad; Alex Cho; Donna Phinney; Simon Curtis; Matthew Roman; Eric G Poon; Jeffrey Ferranti; Jason N Katz; James Tcheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Reduced demand for oral diagnosis during COVID-19: A Brazilian center experience.

Authors:  Ana Paula Neutzling Gomes; Lauren Frenzel Schuch; Sandra Beatriz Chaves Tarquinio; Adriana Etges; Ana Carolina Uchoa Vasconcelos
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  Trend of oral and pharyngeal cancer mortality in Brazil in the period of 2002 to 2013.

Authors:  Lillia Magali Estrada Perea; Marco Aurélio Peres; Antonio Fernando Boing; José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Implication of COVID-19 in oral oncology practices in Brazil, Canada, and the United States.

Authors:  Fabio A Alves; Deborah Saunders; Shaiba Sandhu; Yuanming Xu; Nathalia F de Mendonça; Nathaniel S Treister
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.068

Review 8.  COVID-19 and Italy: what next?

Authors:  Andrea Remuzzi; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The outbreak of Novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused a worrying delay in the diagnosis of oral cancer in north-west Italy: The Turin Metropolitan Area experience.

Authors:  Paolo G Arduino; Davide Conrotto; Roberto Broccoletti
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.068

Review 10.  Infection control in dental health care during and after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

Authors:  Catherine M C Volgenant; Ilona F Persoon; Rolf A G de Ruijter; J J Hans de Soet
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.068

View more
  7 in total

1.  Brazilian Oral Medicine and public health system: The enormous impact of the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Nelson Pereira Marques; Denise Maria Mendes Lúcio da Silveira; Petrônio José de Lima Martelli; Daniella Reis Barbosa Martelli; Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena; Hercílio Martelli-Júnior
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.068

2.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalizations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Amanda Ramos da Cunha; José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes; Manoela Domingues Martins; Stefano Petti; Fernando Neves Hugo
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.489

3.  The impact of COVID-19 on the practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  V-S Mutalik; J Upadhyaya; M Lê; D-J Schönwetter
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2022-09-01

4.  Impact of the absence of dental support on cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Verônica Caroline Brito Reia; Maria Gabriela Robles-Mengoa; Bernardo da Fonseca Orcina; Milenka Gabriela Quenta-Huayhua; Mailon Cury Carneiro; Brena Rodrigues Manzano; Anderson Prestes; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  COVID-19 pandemic impact on prosthetic treatments in the Brazilian Public Health System.

Authors:  Luiz Alexandre Chisini; Letícia Regina Morello Sartori; Francine Dos Santos Costa; Luana Carla Salvi; Flávio Fernando Demarco
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  Oral cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in an oral pathology laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Thamiris C Abrantes; Kelly T Bezerra; Cristiane N Silva; Lindaura C Costa; Márcia G Cabral; Michelle Agostini; Bruno A B de Andrade; Aline C Abrahão; Mário J Romañach
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.068

7.  Impacts of the COVID-19 epidemic on the department of stomatology in a tertiary hospital: A case study in the General Hospital of the Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Qingshan Dong; Angelica Kuria; Yanming Weng; Yu Liu; Yang Cao
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.489

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.