Literature DB >> 32852361

Brief Report: Cessation of Long-Term Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis in HIV-Infected Children Does Not Alter the Carriage of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes.

Freddy Francis1, Ethan K Gough2, Thaddeus J Edens3, Chipo Berejena4, Mutsawashe Bwakura-Dangarembizi4, Annie Shonhai4, Kusum J Nathoo4, Magdalena Glass5, Diana M Gibb6, Andrew J Prendergast7,8, Amee R Manges5,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cotrimoxazole (CTX) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial, combining trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. CTX prophylaxis reduces mortality and morbidity among people living with HIV in regions with high prevalence of bacterial infections and malaria. The Antiretroviral research for Watoto trial evaluated the effect of stopping versus continuing CTX prophylaxis in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS: In this study, 72 HIV-infected Zimbabwean children, on antiretroviral therapy, provided fecal samples at 84 and 96 weeks after randomization to continue or stop CTX. DNA was extracted for whole metagenome shotgun sequencing, with sequencing reads mapped to the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database to identify CTX and other antimicrobial resistance genes.
RESULTS: There were minimal differences in the carriage of CTX resistance genes between groups. The dfrA1 gene, conferring trimethoprim resistance, was significantly higher in the continue group (P = 0.039) and the tetA(P) gene conferring resistance to tetracycline was significantly higher in the stop group (P = 0.013). CTX prophylaxis has a role in shaping the resistome; however, stopping prophylaxis does not decrease resistance gene abundance.
CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in resistance gene carriage between the stop and continue groups. The previously shown multi-faceted protective effects of CTX in antiretroviral research for Watoto trial clinical outcomes are not outweighed by the risk of multi-drug resistance gene selection due to prophylaxis. These findings are reassuring, given current recommendations for long-term CTX prophylaxis among children living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa to decrease mortality and morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32852361      PMCID: PMC7654951          DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.771


INTRODUCTION

World Health Organization guidelines recommend long-term cotrimoxazole (CTX) prophylaxis for people living with HIV in areas where malaria or severe bacterial infections are highly prevalent.[1] This recommendation is based on randomized trials from sub-Saharan Africa in both adults and children, which showed reduced morbidity and mortality with CTX use, regardless of HIV disease stage or antiretroviral therapy (ART) use.[2-5] However, global coverage of CTX among people living with HIV remains poor.[6] One concern with widespread and lifelong use of CTX is selection for and amplification of CTX-specific and overall antimicrobial resistance genes in the intestinal reservoir, leading to a potential increase in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. CTX resistance genes are found in up to 80% of bacterial isolates from urinary tract, wound, and blood infections in areas where prophylaxis is implemented.[7] However, the effectiveness of CTX prophylaxis in reducing morbidity and mortality still remains high despite the prevalence of resistance, possibly due to the anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and taxon-specific antimicrobial effects of CTX.[4,5,8-10] As CTX coverage and duration is scaled up in sub-Saharan Africa, it is critical to understand whether this will drive further antimicrobial resistance in high HIV prevalence areas, which could have an important downstream clinical impact. In this study, we examined carriage of CTX and other resistance genes using metagenome sequencing among HIV-infected children in Zimbabwe who were randomized to continue or stop CTX prophylaxis in the Antiretroviral Research for Watoto (ARROW) trial.

METHODS

Study Setup

ARROW was an open-label parallel-group randomized trial evaluating several management strategies in HIV-infected children between 2006 and 2012, as previously reported.[4,11,12] Children older than 3 years (median age, 7.9 years; interquartile range, 4.6–11.1), enrolled in ARROW and receiving ART with CTX prophylaxis for more than 96 weeks, who had not previously had Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and were using insecticide-treated bed nets (in malaria-endemic areas), were randomized to stop versus continue daily CTX prophylaxis.[4] A sub-group of Zimbabwean children in the last 6 months of trial recruitment from stop (n = 36 at week 84; n = 35 at week 96) and continue (n = 36 at week 84; n = 33 at week 96) groups had fecal samples collected. Caregivers gave written informed consent, and children gave assent depending on age, for the main trial and for this substudy, which were approved by ethics committees in the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe. Stool specimens for the fecal metagenome study were identified from a gut epithelium substudy investigating intestinal inflammation in the ARROW trial (Fig. 1). The 72 children (40 women and 32 men) with a median age of 8.9 years (interquartile range, 5.7–11.1) at the time of randomization, did not substantially differ in baseline characteristics from the full ARROW trial population (data not shown). The samples were stored at −80°C and shipped to British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC for processing. The objective of these analyses was to identify the impact of stopping CTX on the intestinal carriage of antibiotic resistance genes. The protocol for analysis was approved by the research ethics board at the University of British Columbia (protocol number: H14-00300).
FIGURE 1.

Sample origin for the fecal metagenome study. Of the 760 participants who underwent initial randomization in ARROW, 293 were enrolled in an immunology substudy. The 72 fecal samples analyzed in our study originated from a subgroup of participants recruited for the gut epithelium substudy in the final 6 months of the trial in Zimbabwe.

Sample origin for the fecal metagenome study. Of the 760 participants who underwent initial randomization in ARROW, 293 were enrolled in an immunology substudy. The 72 fecal samples analyzed in our study originated from a subgroup of participants recruited for the gut epithelium substudy in the final 6 months of the trial in Zimbabwe.

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

DNA extraction from 150 mg of fecal samples was performed using Qiagen Power Soil DNA extraction kit with bead-beating. DNA was quantified using Quant-iT Pico Green dsDNA assay. DNA libraries were prepared using Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA Library Preparation kits. Libraries were quantified and normalized using qPCR and validated using the Agilent TapeStation system. Twenty-four libraries were pooled per sequencing lane. Whole metagenome sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform at Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, Canada using dual-index, paired end sequencing.

Analysis

The reads were trimmed, filtered, and mapped to the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database using the resistance gene identifier tool. Genes with >80% coverage and 100% homology were defined as present. The “vegan” analysis package in R was used to evaluate the alpha and beta diversity measures for the resistant genes. The alpha diversity of resistant genes is defined as the read count normalized Shannon diversity metric within a sample. The beta diversity of resistance genes was defined as the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity metric between the samples. Differences in alpha and beta diversity of resistance genes between the stop and continue groups were conducted using the analysis of variance test. Logistic regression was performed to compare differences in the presence and absence of antimicrobial resistance genes between the stop and continue groups. Negative binomial regression was performed to compare normalized gene counts (with sequencing depth as the offset), including an adjustment for timing of sample collection between the randomized groups. Results are reported as percent of subjects positive for a specific gene class and by total gene count for each gene class for all subjects in each group. Analyses were undertaken using R program version 3.5.1.

RESULTS

In total, 2900 resistance genes across all gene classes in continue group members and 3021 resistance genes in the stop group were identified through comprehensive antibiotic resistance database alignment of metagenome data. There were no significant differences observed in the analysis of variance of the read-count normalized gene-level Shannon alpha diversity (P = 0.62) and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity-based beta diversity (P = 0.67) of the genes between the stop and continue groups. CTX resistance genes, including the sul gene conferring sulfonamide resistance and dfr gene conferring trimethoprim resistance, were persistently carried by all subjects regardless of CTX discontinuation (Table 1). The dfrA1 gene, encoding trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase, was on average 5-fold higher in the continue group [odds ratio (OR), 4.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24 to 31.62] than in the stop group, although it was present in only 6.3% of the total samples and represented only 0.3% of the observed resistance gene counts in the continue group. Sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1-3) were also present in all subjects, but contributed to a small fraction of total resistance gene counts (2.5%) (Table 1).
TABLE 1.

Occurrence of All Cotrimoxazole Resistance and Other Clinically Relevant Resistance Genes in the Fecal Metagenome of HIV-Infected Children Randomized to Continue or Stop Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis in the ARROW Trial

Gene NameResistance ConferredGene Class-Positive Subjects*Gene Counts by Class
Continue, n (%)Stop, n (%)Continue, Counts (%)Stop, Counts (%)
dfr(A1, A5, A7, A8, A12, A14, A15, A17, F) (dihydrofolate reductase)Trimethoprim36 (100)36 (100)122 (4.2)109 (3.6)
folP (dihydropteroate synthase)Sulfonamide18 (50)20 (55.6)24 (0.8)27 (0.9)
sul(1,2,3) (dihydropteroate synthase)Sulfonamide36 (100)36 (100)79 (2.7)70 (2.3)
Erm(B,F,G,Q,T) (ribosomal RNA methyltransferase)Macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins34 (94.4)31 (86.1)193 (6.7)217 (7.2)
tet(A(P)-D,J-O,Q-S,W,X, 32,40,44) (tetracycline-resistant ribosomal protein)Tetracycline36 (100)36 (100)500 (17.2)533 (17.6)
CfxA(1-6) (beta-lactamase)Cephamycin36 (100)36 (100)311 (10.7)341 (11.3)
APH (phosphorylation of streptomycin)Streptomycin31 (86.1)25 (69.4)147 (5.1)123 (4.1)

Number of subjects who are gene class-positive in either or both week-84 and week-96 samples.

The total count of resistant genes by gene class in the stop or continue groups. Proportion of gene class counts out of the total, 2900 and 3021 genes in the continue and stop groups, respectively.

Genes that were significantly different between the stop and the continue groups using negative binomial regression, normalized for read depth. dfrA1: 5-fold higher in the continue group; OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.24–31.62. tetA(P): 3-fold higher in the stop group; OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.25–5.45.

Occurrence of All Cotrimoxazole Resistance and Other Clinically Relevant Resistance Genes in the Fecal Metagenome of HIV-Infected Children Randomized to Continue or Stop Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis in the ARROW Trial Number of subjects who are gene class-positive in either or both week-84 and week-96 samples. The total count of resistant genes by gene class in the stop or continue groups. Proportion of gene class counts out of the total, 2900 and 3021 genes in the continue and stop groups, respectively. Genes that were significantly different between the stop and the continue groups using negative binomial regression, normalized for read depth. dfrA1: 5-fold higher in the continue group; OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.24–31.62. tetA(P): 3-fold higher in the stop group; OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.25–5.45. Genes encoding beta-lactamases, and genes conferring resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics and tetracycline, were very common in the stop and continue groups (Table 1). Together, tet (tetracyline resistance) and cfxA (beta-lactamase) genes represented almost one-third of the total resistant gene counts in both groups. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes (blaTEM) were found in one stop and one continue sample at the 84-week time-point, and no carbapenem-resistance genes were identified. The tetracycline-resistance gene count for tetA(P) gene encoding an inner membrane tetracycline efflux protein found in Clostridium species, was on average 3-fold higher in the stop group (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.25 to 5.45) than in the continue group. The increased occurrence of tetA(P) gene in the stop group may be attributed to the recovery of tetA(P)-carrying Clostridium species, such as Clostridium bartlettii, which is more abundant in the stop group at both time points.[8] The abundance of all other antimicrobial genes in both groups was similar, and there were few differences in the carriage of antimicrobial resistance genes between the 84-week (only APH(6)-Id) and 96-week (only tet44 and tetA(P)) sample time-points within subjects. There were also no differences in microbial diversity, enteric pathogen carriage, or microbiota composition, aside from the presence of fewer viridans group streptococci in the continue group at both time-points, as previously reported.[8]

DISCUSSION

The observed differences in resistance gene carriage profiles in ART-treated children randomized to stop or continue CTX were minimal; only the dfrA1 gene was higher, whereas the tetA gene was lower, in children continuing CTX. None of the children in the trial were CTX-naïve because they had all received prophylactic CTX for at least 96 weeks before randomization to either stop or continue CTX, which explains the universal carriage of sul and dfr genes. The Botswana Mpepu study showed up to 57% and 37% of the sample population was positive for CTX-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively, before CTX exposure. CTX prophylaxis increased the proportion of participants with CTX resistance at 3 and 6 months postexposure.[13] A culture-based study done at the Bugando Medical Centre in Tanzania reported that up to 77% of the healthy population defined as HIV negative with no antibiotic prophylaxis grew at least one organism resistant to CTX; and of the HIV-positive population in the study, 17% more CTX positive cultures were observed in those who continued CTX prophylaxis relative to the no prophylaxis group.[14] This shows that CTX resistance inherently present in the population before CTX exposure, is amplified by CTX prophylaxis. Another longitudinal substudy of a randomized controlled trial in South Africa evaluating the impact of CTX exposure in HIV-exposed, but uninfected infants in the first year of life showed that CTX prophylaxis increased the abundance and alpha diversity of the CTX resistance genes in the gut relative to a CTX-naive group, but decreased the resistant gene beta diversity in children receiving CTX prophylaxis.[15,16] No significant differences in the occurrence of CTX resistance genes were observed in our study over the 2 sampling time points and minimal differences in the overall resistance gene counts were noted. This indicates that CTX use plays a role in shaping the resistome; however, removal of CTX selective pressure does not decrease the abundance nor diversity of the resistome established by CTX prophylaxis. Other studies have also shown minimal or no differences in the diversity of gut microbiota after long- and short-term CTX use.[8,17] The combination of these findings suggests that CTX prophylaxis shapes the development of the microbiome in childhood such that people with CTX exposure have lower taxonomic and resistance beta diversity, but high resistance alpha diversity. However, our results show that the resistance gene profiles remain largely unchanged for up to 22 months post-CTX discontinuation. Though the participants in our study were older, perinatal exposure to CTX could also alter the development of the intestinal microbiome. The effect of perinatal CTX exposure during gestation and through breastfeeding needs to be further characterized to evaluate the granular impact of oral CTX prophylaxis for infants in shaping their microbiome, as passage of CTX into breastmilk and the inheritance of antibiotic resistant genes from mother have been previously described.[18-20] Information regarding additional non-CTX antibiotic exposure for ARROW participants was not available. Metagenome identification of resistance genes does not confirm phenotypic expression of resistance and precludes accurate localization of genes to specific plasmids or genomes; therefore, only gene presence, absence, and gene counts are reported. Higher tetracycline resistance gene counts could also be explained by higher overall microbial load due to the absence of CTX selection pressure in the gut of children who stopped CTX prophylaxis; adjustment for starting microbial load in processed fecal samples was not possible.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of CTX prophylaxis in reducing mortality and morbidity has been demonstrated in multiple trials among people living with HIV, even in areas with high baseline levels of CTX resistance.[3,4,8] This may partly be because CTX has properties beyond its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, including anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and narrow microbiome modulating benefits.[8] This study shows that the vital population health benefits of long-term CTX prophylaxis in areas of high HIV prevalence, do not seem to be outweighed by a greater risk of antibiotic resistance gene carriage. However, our results, in combination with D'Souza et al,[15] suggest that long-term CTX prophylaxis has a lasting effect on intestinal antibiotic resistance gene carriage and these effects persist even after many months without any CTX exposure. Our results provide reassurance to policymakers to continue scaling up long-term CTX prophylaxis in sub-Saharan Africa, because continuing CTX does not appear to drive accumulation of further antimicrobial resistance. To further reduce mortality in high HIV prevalence areas, efforts to scale-up widespread adoption of CTX prophylaxis in HIV-infected children remain a public health priority.
  18 in total

1.  Efficacy of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole prophylaxis to decrease morbidity and mortality in HIV-1-infected patients with tuberculosis in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Z Wiktor; M Sassan-Morokro; A D Grant; L Abouya; J M Karon; C Maurice; G Djomand; A Ackah; K Domoua; A Kadio; A Yapi; P Combe; O Tossou; T H Roels; E M Lackritz; D Coulibaly; K M De Cock; I M Coulibaly; A E Greenberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Co-trimoxazole as prophylaxis against opportunistic infections in HIV-infected Zambian children (CHAP): a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  C Chintu; G J Bhat; A S Walker; V Mulenga; F Sinyinza; K Lishimpi; L Farrelly; N Kaganson; A Zumla; S H Gillespie; A J Nunn; D M Gibb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Nov 20-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  The expanding role of co-trimoxazole in developing countries.

Authors:  James A Church; Felicity Fitzgerald; A Sarah Walker; Diana M Gibb; Andrew J Prendergast
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Distribution of cotrimoxazole resistance genes associated with class 1 integrons in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in a university hospital in Tunisia.

Authors:  Safia Dahmen; Wejdene Mansour; Noureddine Boujaafar; Guillaume Arlet; Olfa Bouallègue
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.431

5.  Cotrimoxazole reduces systemic inflammation in HIV infection by altering the gut microbiome and immune activation.

Authors:  Claire D Bourke; Ethan K Gough; Godfrey Pimundu; Annie Shonhai; Chipo Berejena; Louise Terry; Lucas Baumard; Naheed Choudhry; Yusuf Karmali; Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Victor Musiime; Joseph Lutaakome; Adeodata Kekitiinwa; Kuda Mutasa; Alexander J Szubert; Moira J Spyer; Jane R Deayton; Magdalena Glass; Hyun Min Geum; Claire Pardieu; Diana M Gibb; Nigel Klein; Thaddeus J Edens; A Sarah Walker; Amee R Manges; Andrew J Prendergast
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Strain-level analysis of gut-resident pro-inflammatory viridans group Streptococci suppressed by long-term cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among HIV-positive children in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Ethan K Gough; Claire D Bourke; Chipo Berejena; Annie Shonhai; Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Andrew J Prendergast; Amee R Manges
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  A randomized trial of prolonged co-trimoxazole in HIV-infected children in Africa.

Authors:  Diana M Gibb; A Sarah Walker; Andrew J Prendergast; Mutsawashe Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Lindsay Kendall; Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka; Patricia Nahirya-Ntege; Rosette Keishanyu; Kusum Nathoo; Moira J Spyer; Adeodata Kekitiinwa; Joseph Lutaakome; Tawanda Mhute; Philip Kasirye; Paula Munderi; Victor Musiime
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Once vs twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine in African children.

Authors:  Victor Musiime; Philip Kasirye; Bethany Naidoo-James; Patricia Nahirya-Ntege; Tawanda Mhute; Adrian Cook; Lincoln Mugarura; Marshall Munjoma; Navdeep K Thoofer; Emmanuel Ndashimye; Immaculate Nankya; Moira J Spyer; Margaret J Thomason; Wendy Snowden; Diana M Gibb; Ann Sarah Walker
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was associated with enteric commensal bacterial resistance among HIV-exposed infants in a randomized controlled trial, Botswana.

Authors:  Kathleen M Powis; Sajini Souda; Shahin Lockman; Gbolahan Ajibola; Kara Bennett; Jean Leidner; Michael D Hughes; Sikhulile Moyo; Erik van Widenfelt; Haruna B Jibril; Joseph Makhema; Max Essex; Roger L Shapiro
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.396

10.  Maternal gut and breast milk microbiota affect infant gut antibiotic resistome and mobile genetic elements.

Authors:  Katariina Pärnänen; Antti Karkman; Jenni Hultman; Christina Lyra; Johan Bengtsson-Palme; D G Joakim Larsson; Samuli Rautava; Erika Isolauri; Seppo Salminen; Himanshu Kumar; Reetta Satokari; Marko Virta
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The impact of mass drug administration of antibiotics on the gut microbiota of target populations.

Authors:  Ethan K Gough
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 10.485

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.