Literature DB >> 32851442

Reporting frequency of radiology findings increases after introducing visual rating scales in the primary care diagnostic work up of subjective and mild cognitive impairment.

Claes Håkansson1,2, Gustav Torisson3,4, Elisabet Londos4,5, Oskar Hansson4,5, Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher6, Danielle van Westen7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Study the effect of introducing a template for radiological reporting of non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) in the primary care diagnostic work up of cognitive impairment using visual rating scales (VRS).
METHODS: Radiology reports were assessed regarding compliance with a contextual report template and the reporting of the parameters medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), white matter changes (WMC), global cortical atrophy (GCA), and width of lateral ventricles (WLV) using established VRS in two age-matched groups examined with NECT before (n = 111) and after (n = 125) the introduction of contextual reporting at our department. True positive rate (TPR) and true negative rate (TNR) before and after were compared.
RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in the percentage of radiology reports with mentioning of MTA from 29 to 76% (p < 0.001), WMC from 69 to 86% (p < 0.01), and GCA from 54 to 82% (p < 0.001). We observed a significant increase in the percentages of reports where all of the parameters were mentioned, from 6 to 29% (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in TPR from 10 to 55% for MTA.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that contextual radiological assessment using VRS could increase the reporting frequency of radiology findings in the diagnostic work up of cognitive impairment but compliance with templates may be difficult to endorse. KEY POINTS: • Introducing visual rating scales in clinical practice increases the reporting frequency of MTA, WMC, and GCA in the diagnostic work up of subjective and mild cognitive impairment. • Introducing visual rating scales has an effect on the true positive rate of reported MTA. • Compliance with contextual radiology templates remains low when use of the template is not enforced by the department leadership.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Dementia; Tomography X-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32851442      PMCID: PMC7813688          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07180-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

1.  Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.

Authors:  Jan M L Bosmans; Joost J Weyler; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  The radiology report--are we getting the message across?

Authors:  A Wallis; P McCoubrie
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.

Authors:  David B Larson; Alex J Towbin; Rebecca M Pryor; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Temporal lobe rating scale: application to Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  C J Galton; B Gomez-Anson; N Antoun; P Scheltens; K Patterson; M Graves; B J Sahakian; J R Hodges
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging.

Authors:  F Fazekas; J B Chawluk; A Alavi; H I Hurtig; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Imaging biomarkers of dementia: recommended visual rating scales with teaching cases.

Authors:  Lars-Olof Wahlund; Eric Westman; Danielle van Westen; Anders Wallin; Sara Shams; Lena Cavallin; Elna-Marie Larsson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-12-21

7.  Practical use of visual medial temporal lobe atrophy cut-off scores in Alzheimer's disease: Validation in a large memory clinic population.

Authors:  Jules J Claus; Salka S Staekenborg; Dana C Holl; Jelmen J Roorda; Jacqueline Schuur; Pieter Koster; Caroline E M Tielkes; Philip Scheltens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Dementia imaging in clinical practice: a European-wide survey of 193 centres and conclusions by the ESNR working group.

Authors:  M W Vernooij; F B Pizzini; R Schmidt; M Smits; T A Yousry; N Bargallo; G B Frisoni; S Haller; F Barkhof
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Structural magnetic resonance imaging in the practical assessment of dementia: beyond exclusion.

Authors:  Philip Scheltens; Nick Fox; Frederik Barkhof; Charles De Carli
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 10.  Radiology reporting-from Hemingway to HAL?

Authors:  Adrian P Brady
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Inter-modality assessment of medial temporal lobe atrophy in a non-demented population: application of a visual rating scale template across radiologists with varying clinical experience.

Authors:  Claes Håkansson; Ashkan Tamaddon; Henrik Andersson; Gustav Torisson; Gustav Mårtensson; My Truong; Mårten Annertz; Elisabet Londos; Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher; Oskar Hansson; Danielle van Westen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.