Arnold J Suda1, Xaver Brachtendorf2, Marco Tinelli3, Raed Wagokh4, Ghaith Abou-Nouar4, Oliver E Bischel2. 1. AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, Dr. Franz-Rehrl-Platz 5, 5010, Salzburg, Austria. arnold.suda@auva.at. 2. BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany. 3. Sinsheim Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Sinsheim, Germany. 4. Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Department of Orthopaedics, Amman, Jordan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Arthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life. METHODS: In a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: We included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Despite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.
PURPOSE: Arthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life. METHODS: In a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: We included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Despite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.
Entities:
Keywords:
Complications; External fixator; Intramedullary nail; Knee arthrodesis; Quality of life
Authors: Brian P Chalmers; Alexis K Matrka; Stephen A Sems; Matthew P Abdel; Rafael J Sierra; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano; Tad M Mabry; Kevin I Perry Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.082
Authors: Charlotte Reinke; Hinnerk Bäcker; Sebastian Lotzien; Thomas A Schildhauer; Dominik Seybold; Jan Gessmann Journal: Z Orthop Unfall Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 0.923
Authors: Pablo S Corona; Maria Jurado; Ana Scott-Tennent; Rosa Fraile; Luis Carrera; Matías Vicente Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2020-02-04
Authors: Sven Hungerer; Martin Kiechle; Christian von Rüden; Matthias Militz; Knut Beitzel; Mario Morgenstern Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Wesley H Mayes; Anna C Severin; Erin M Mannen; Paul K Edwards; C Lowry Barnes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Simon C Mears Journal: Arthroplast Today Date: 2021-02-26
Authors: Dirk Zajonz; Benedikt Zimmerlich; Robert Möbius; Melanie Edel; Johanna Przybyl; Andreas Höch; Johannes K M Fakler; Andreas Roth; Mohamed Ghanem Journal: Orthopade Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 1.087