| Literature DB >> 32849555 |
Jinghua Wu1,2, Xie Wang2, Liya Lin2, Xuemei Li2, Sixi Liu3, Wei Zhang2,4, Lihua Luo1,2, Ziyun Wan2, Mingyan Fang2, Yi Zhao2, Xiaodong Wang3, Huirong Mai3, Xiuli Yuan3, Feiqiu Wen3, Changgang Li3, Xiao Liu2,5.
Abstract
Accurate T cell receptor repertoire profiling has provided novel biological and clinical insights in widespread immunological settings; however, there is a lack of reference materials in the community that can be used to calibrate and optimize the various experimental systems in different laboratories. In this study, we designed and synthesized 611 T cell receptor (TCR) beta chain (TRB) templates and used them as reference materials to optimize the multiplex PCR experimental system to enrich the TRB repertoire. We assessed the stability of the optimized system by repeating the experiments in different batches and by remixing the TRB templates in different ratios. These TRB reference materials could be used as independent positive controls to assess the accuracy of the experimental system, and they can also be used as spike-in materials to calibrate the residual biases of the experimental system. We then used the optimized system to detect the minimal residual disease of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and showed a higher sensitivity compared with flow cytometry. We also interrogated how chemotherapy affected the TCR repertoire of patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Our result shows that high-avidity T cells, such as those targeting known pathogens, are largely selected during chemotherapy, despite the global immunosuppression. These T cells were stimulated and emerged at the time of induction treatment and further expanded during consolidation treatment, possibly to fight against infections. These data demonstrate that accurate immune repertoire information can improve our understanding of the adaptive immunity in leukemia and lead to better treatment management of the patients.Entities:
Keywords: TRB; immune repertoire; leukemia; minimal residual disease; multiplex PCR system optimization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32849555 PMCID: PMC7423970 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Amplification bias of the multiplex PCR reaction system during primer mix optimization for pool 1. (A) The TRBV amplification bias before optimization. (B,C) The TRBV amplification bias during optimization. (D) The TRBV amplification bias after optimization. (E) The TRBJ amplification bias before optimization. (F,G) The TRBJ amplification bias during optimization. (H) The TRBJ amplification bias after optimization.
Figure 2The robustness of optimized multiplex PCR reaction system. (A–C) The TRBV usage frequency distributions in three batches of experiments. (D–F) The TRBJ usage frequency distributions in three batches of experiments. (G,H) The TRBV usage frequency before and after amplification for the first (G) and second (H) gradient mixture of the TRB templates. In (G,H), the black bar is the TRBV usage before amplification, and gray bar is the TRBV usage after amplification.
Figure 3Comparing the (A) TRBV and (B) TRBJ amplification bias of TRB templates as spike-in and pure templates. The spike-ins 1–3 indicated that 20,000 TRB templates were mixed with three natural DNA samples.
Comparing MRD detection results by TCR-seq and FC of T-ALL patients.
| CYY | 0 | 85.4 | 69 | 27.83 | NA | NA |
| 33 | 24 | 12.18 | 14.36 | 3.8 | 3.45 | |
| 96 | 0.45 | 15.41 | 13.02 | 0 | 0.06 | |
| TDJ | 8 | 63.96 | ND | 29.96 | ND | 19.16 |
| 15 | 49.36 | 32.26 | 31.74 | 18.5 | 15.67 | |
| 33 | 2 | 15.16 | 15.30 | 0 | 0.31 |
The TRB CDR3 of cancer clonotype for patients CYY:
TGCAGTGCCTCGCCTCCTCCTAGCGGGAGGGGGAATGAGCAGTTCTTC.
The TRB CDR3 of cancer clonotype for patients TDJ:
TGCAGTGCTAGAGACCTGGGACAGGGGAGCAGGATTAGCTCCTACGAGCAGTACTTC.
DAC, day after beginning of chemotherapy; NA, not applicable; ND, not detection.
Figure 4Comparing the (A) Shannon index, (B) Pielou's index, and (C) percentage of top 100 maximal frequency clonotypes among three different time points of the same B-ALL patients. The three time points were before chemotherapy and 33 and 64 days after chemotherapy. P-value was calculated by two-sided paired t-test.
Figure 5The frequencies of the persistent and private clonotypes on two time points. (A) On days 0 and 33. (B) On days 33 and 64. ALL-1-0, ALL-1-33, and ALL-1-64 refer to frequencies on days 0, 33, and 64, respectively. Paired tests were performed on the frequencies of persistent clonotypes between day 33 and 64.
Figure 6The proportion of known pathogens specific TRB clonotypes (PKPSC) in persistent and private clonotypes on two time points. (A) On days 0 and 33. (B) On days 33 and 64.