| Literature DB >> 32848735 |
Isaac Zentner1, Hyun-Moon Back2, Leonid Kagan2, Selvakumar Subbian1, Jyothi Nagajyothi3, Shashikant Srivastava4, Jotam Pasipanodya5, Tawanda Gumbo5, Gregory P Bisson6, Christopher Vinnard1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential for hepatotoxicity during isoniazid-based tuberculosis (TB) treatment presents a major challenge for TB control programs worldwide. We sought to determine whether pharmacokinetic exposures of isoniazid and its metabolites were related to cellular oxidation/reduction status and downstream markers of oxidative DNA damage.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; hepatotoxicity; isoniazid (INH); oxidative stress; tuberculosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32848735 PMCID: PMC7406860 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Metabolic pathway of isoniazid (Sotsuka et al., 2011). Reproduced with permission from Sotsuka T et al. Association of isoniazid-metabolizing enzyme genotypes and isoniazid-induced hepatotoxicity in tuberculosis patients. In Vivo 2011;25:803-12.
Figure 2Plasma concentration-time exposures of isoniazid and its metabolites among 10 isoniazid-treated patients, including 6 patients treated with isoniazid in combination with first-line anti- tuberculosis (TB) therapy for active TB disease, and 4 patients treated with isoniazid monotherapy for latent TB infection. Black line/triangles: active TB disease patients; grey line/circles: latent TB infection patients. (A) Isoniazid. (B) Acetylisoniazid. (C) Hydrazine. (D) Acetylhydrazine.
Predicted liver tissue exposures of isoniazid and metabolites based on PBPK modeling.
| Compound | Observed median (range) of plasma AUC0-24 (uM*hr) | Predicted ratio of liver/plasma AUC0–24 | Predicted median liver AUC0–24 (uM*hr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isoniazid | 60.5 (28.4, 269.4) | 0.72 | 43.6 |
| Acetylisoniazid | 157.6 (72.2, 349.8) | 0.72 | 113.5 |
| Hydrazine | 14.5 (3.0, 27.8) | 18.08 | 262.2 |
| Acetylhydrazine | 66.6 (43.2, 198.0) | 0.79 | 52.6 |
Figure 3Mitochondrial injury and glutathione depletion in HepG2 cells treated with isoniazid and metabolites over 28 days. Cell passages were conducted every 3 days under continual exposure to the designated compound for the indicated time period. Treated cells and supernatants were then examined for markers of cytotoxicity and mitochondrial toxicity. (A) Overall cytotoxicity was evaluated by the addition of a fluorogenic peptide substrate, bis-AAF-R110, to the cell supernatant, which penetrates compromised plasma membranes and is activated via interactions with necrosis-associated proteases. (B) Cellular glutathione depletion was quantified in a free thiol availability assay. (C) Mitochondrial membrane integrity as measured with addition of TMRM, a cell-permeant dye that accumulates in active mitochondria with intact membrane potential and is depleted with free radical injury to mitochondrial membrane potential. (D) ATP production assayed using the Mitochondrial ToxGlo Assay (Promega, Madison, WI).
Figure 4DNA damage markers in HepG2 cells treated with isoniazid and metabolites. (A) Comet chip microscopy of DNA damage after 7 days exposure. (B) Percentage of DNA in comet tail for isoniazid and metabolites after 7 days exposure. (C) Levels of phosphorylated gamma-ph2Ax levels in HepG2 cells after 28 days exposure. H2Ax is a core histone protein found in the nucleosome, and its phosphorylation is a marker of DNA damage caused by ROS. (D) 8-OhDG levels in cellular supernatant following 28 days exposure, a measure of oxidative DNA damage.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of HIV/TB patients in Botswana, stratified by NAT2 genotype.
| Characteristic | Slow | Intermediate | Rapid | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age (years) (range) | 30 (24–44) | 32 (25–48) | 32 (24–49) | 0.54 |
| Male sex (%) | 2 (29%) | 11 (55%) | 9 (69%) | 0.22 |
| Median body weight (kg) (range) | 55.0 (44.0–67.0) | 54.8 (37.3–77.0) | 55.0 (42–60.5) | 0.64 |
| Median creatinine clearance (ml/min) (range) | 100.9 (85.3–129.6) | 107.2 (68.4–141.3) | 98.4 (40.1–157.6) | 0.69 |
| Number of current smokers (%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | 2 (15%) | 0.40 |
| Number with positive AFB sputum smear (%) | 4 (57%) | 15 (79%) | 9 (69%) | 0.53 |
| Median CD4+ T cell count (cells/ml3) (range) | 252 (208–486) | 238 (36–501) | 209 (11–735) | 0.69 |
| Median HIV viral load | 2.5x104
| 1.1x105
| 1.3x105
| 0.72 |
Figure 5Urine levels of oxidative DNA damage among 39 HIV/TB patients in Botswana treated with first-line TB therapy including isoniazid, grouped by NAT2 and GSTA2 genotypes. (A) Univariate association of NAT2 genotype and urine oxidative DNA damage (p=0.04). Box plots correspond to median value and interquartile range. (B) Univariate association of urine 8-OhDG with GSTA2 genotype (p=.03). Box plots correspond to median value and interquartile range. (C) Margins plot of interaction between isoniazid Cmax and GSTA2 genotype. Each line represents marginal predicted levels of oxidative DNA damage for varying isoniazid Cmax, according to GSTA2 genotype, and the shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Solid line: GSTA2*B/*B; dashed line: GSTA2*C/*B or *C.
Linear regression model of predictors of urine oxidative DNA damage among isoniazid-treated HIV/TB patients in Botswana.
| Characteristic | Unadjusted regression coefficient (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted regression coefficient (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | -0.013 (-0.067, 0.041) | 0.63 | ||
| Sex | 0.36 | |||
| Male (n=) | Reference | |||
| Female (n=) | 0.391 (-0.464, 1.247) | |||
| Body weight (kg) | -0.004 (-0.055, 0.047) | 0.88 | -0.094 (-0.164, -0.026) | 0.01 |
| Creatinine clearance (ml/h) | 0.010 (-0.011, 0.031) | 0.35 | 0.020 (-0.005, 0.045) | 0.11 |
| Positive AFB sputum smear | -0.449 (-1.396, 0.498) | 0.34 | ||
| Days of TB treatment | 0.004 (-0.029, 0.038) | 0.80 | ||
| CD4+ T cell count (cells/ml3) | 0.001 (-0.002, 0.003) | 0.48 | ||
| Log HIV viral load | -0.009 (-0.193, 0.175) | 0.92 | ||
| CRP | 0.014 (-0.012, 0.040) | 0.28 | ||
| Log IL-6 | -0.001 (-0.009, 0.008) | 0.85 | ||
|
| ||||
| Isoniazid Cmax (mg/L) | 0.153 (-0.060, 0.366) | 0.15 | 0.241 (0.020, 0.462) | 0.03 |
| Isoniazid log AUC0-24 | 0.474 (-0.272, 1.221) | 0.21 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 0.12 | |||
| Rapid (n=13) | Reference | |||
| Intermediate (n=20) | 0.616 (-0.311, 1.544) | |||
| Slow (n=7) | 1.241 (0.033, 2.449) | |||
|
| ||||
| GSTA2*B/*B (n=25) | Reference | |||
|
| 0.971 (0.131, 1.810) | 0.03 | 1.259 (0.321, 2.198) | 0.02 |
|
| 0.34 | |||
| WT/WT (n=5) | Reference | |||
| WT/Var (n=26) | 0.848 (-0.359, 2.054) | |||
| Var/Var (n=8) | 0.469 (-0.965, 1.902) | |||
|
| -0.819 (-2.415, 0.777) | 0.31 | ||