Literature DB >> 32848037

Performance of the Lateral Flow Assay and the Latex Agglutination Serum Cryptococcal Antigen Test in Cryptococcal Disease in Patients with and without HIV.

Matthew A Hevey1, Ige A George1, Adriana M Rauseo1, Lindsey Larson1, William Powderly1, Andrej Spec2.   

Abstract

Cryptococcal epidemiology is shifting toward HIV-negative populations who have diverse presentations. Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing is also changing, with development of the lateral flow assay (LFA) having reported increased sensitivity and specificity, but with minimal knowledge in the HIV-negative population. In this study, we evaluate the real-life performance of CrAg testing in patients with cryptococcal disease. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with cryptococcosis from 2002 to 2019 at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Latex agglutination (LA) was used exclusively until April 2016, at which point LFA was used exclusively. Demographics, presentations, and testing outcomes were evaluated. Serum CrAg testing was completed in 227 patients with cryptococcosis. Of 141 HIV-negative patients, 107 had LA testing and 34 had LFA testing. In patients with disseminated disease, serum CrAg sensitivity by LA was 78.1% compared to 82.6% for LFA. In patients with localized pulmonary disease, serum CrAg sensitivity was 23.5% compared to 90.9% for LFA. Of 86 people living with HIV (PLWH), 76 had LA testing, and 10 had LFA testing. Serum CrAg sensitivity for LA was 94.7% compared to 100% for LFA in patients with disseminated disease. We noted a significant improvement in sensitivity from LA testing to LFA testing, predominantly in those with localized pulmonary disease. However, both LFA and LA appear to be less sensitive in HIV-negative patients than previously described in PLWH.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryptococcus neoformanszzm321990; cryptococcal antigen; diagnosis; test performance

Year:  2020        PMID: 32848037      PMCID: PMC7587084          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01563-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of four assays for the detection of cryptococcal antigen.

Authors:  M J Binnicker; D J Jespersen; J E Bestrom; L O Rollins
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-10-17

2.  Enzyme immunoassay versus latex agglutination cryptococcal antigen assays in adults with non-HIV-related cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Anil A Panackal; John P Dekker; Michael Proschan; Andrea Beri; Peter R Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis.

Authors:  Radha Rajasingham; Rachel M Smith; Benjamin J Park; Joseph N Jarvis; Nelesh P Govender; Tom M Chiller; David W Denning; Angela Loyse; David R Boulware
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Presentation and Mortality of Cryptococcal Infection Varies by Predisposing Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Matthew A Hevey; Ige A George; Krunal Raval; William G Powderly; Andrej Spec
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Comparison of commercial kits for detection of cryptococcal antigen.

Authors:  D C Tanner; M P Weinstein; B Fedorciw; K L Joho; J J Thorpe; L Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Performance of the Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay in Non-HIV-Related Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Anupop Jitmuang; Anil A Panackal; Peter R Williamson; John E Bennett; John P Dekker; Adrian M Zelazny
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison and temporal trends of three groups with cryptococcosis: HIV-infected, solid organ transplant, and HIV-negative/non-transplant.

Authors:  Emily W Bratton; Nada El Husseini; Cody A Chastain; Michael S Lee; Charles Poole; Til Stürmer; Jonathan J Juliano; David J Weber; John R Perfect
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  EQUAL Cryptococcus Score 2018: A European Confederation of Medical Mycology Score Derived From Current Guidelines to Measure QUALity of Clinical Cryptococcosis Management.

Authors:  Andrej Spec; Carlos Mejia-Chew; William G Powderly; Oliver A Cornely
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  Epidemiology of cryptococcal meningitis in the US: 1997-2009.

Authors:  Vasilios Pyrgos; Amy E Seitz; Claudia A Steiner; D Rebecca Prevots; Peter R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predictors of mortality and differences in clinical features among patients with Cryptococcosis according to immune status.

Authors:  Kyle D Brizendine; John W Baddley; Peter G Pappas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pulmonary cryptococcosis mimicking lung cancer: 3 case report.

Authors:  Zhifei Xin; Bowen Li; Wenfei Xue; Wei Lin; Qingtao Zhao; Xiaopeng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Noninvasive Testing and Surrogate Markers in Invasive Fungal Diseases.

Authors:  George R Thompson; David R Boulware; Nathan C Bahr; Cornelius J Clancy; Thomas S Harrison; Carol A Kauffman; Thuy Le; Marisa H Miceli; Eleftherios Mylonakis; M Hong Nguyen; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Thomas F Patterson; John R Perfect; Andrej Spec; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Peter G Pappas
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.423

3.  Derivation and validation of a clinical model to identify cryptococcosis from suspected malignant pulmonary nodules: A dual-center case-control study.

Authors:  Bei Mao; Hai Zhang; Wen-Wen Wang; Hai-Wen Lu; Jia-Wei Yang; Sen Jiang; Xiao-Dan Ye; Feng Li; Jin-Fu Xu
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2021-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.