Literature DB >> 32845526

Recent US State and Federal Drinking Water Guidelines for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Gloria B Post1.   

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of synthetic chemicals produced for over 70 years, are of increasing concern because of their widespread environmental presence, extreme persistence, bioaccumulative nature, and evidence for health effects from environmentally relevant exposures. In 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established nonregulatory drinking water Health Advisories of 70 ng/L for individual and total concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), the 8-carbon perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) that are the most thoroughly studied PFAS. As of May 2020, 9 US states had concluded that the USEPA Health Advisories are insufficiently protective and developed more stringent PFOA and PFOS guidelines. In addition, 10 states had developed guidelines for other PFAS, primarily PFAAs. This Critical Review discusses the scientific basis for state and USEPA drinking water guidelines for PFOA and PFOS; the same principles apply to guidelines for other PFAS. Similarities and differences among guidelines arise from both toxicity and exposure considerations. The approximately 4-fold range among state guidelines (8-35 ng/L for PFOA, 10-40 ng/L for PFOS) is not large or unexpected for guidelines developed by different scientists at different time points, especially when compared with older USEPA and state guidelines that were generally several orders of magnitude higher. Additional state guidelines for PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS are expected to become available. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:560-563.
© 2020 SETAC. © 2020 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water; PFAS; PFOA; PFOS; Risk assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 32845526     DOI: 10.1002/etc.4863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  10 in total

1.  PFAS in drinking water and serum of the people of a southeast Alaska community: A pilot study.

Authors:  Maksat Babayev; Staci L Capozzi; Pamela Miller; Kelly R McLaughlin; Samarys Seguinot Medina; Samuel Byrne; Guomao Zheng; Amina Salamova
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 9.988

2.  A graphene-based hydrogel monolith with tailored surface chemistry for PFAS passive sampling.

Authors:  Jitka Becanova; Zachary S S L Saleeba; Aidan Stone; Anna R Robuck; Robert H Hurt; Rainer Lohmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2021-08-10

3.  Official health communications are failing PFAS-contaminated communities.

Authors:  Alan Ducatman; Jonas LaPier; Rebecca Fuoco; Jamie C DeWitt
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 7.123

4.  Developmental toxicity of Nafion byproduct 2 (NBP2) in the Sprague-Dawley rat with comparisons to hexafluoropropylene oxide-dimer acid (HFPO-DA or GenX) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS).

Authors:  Justin M Conley; Christy S Lambright; Nicola Evans; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; Donna Hill; James McCord; Mark J Strynar; Leah C Wehmas; Susan Hester; Denise K MacMillan; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Denis R LeBlanc; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Mary C Cardon; Jimmy M Clark; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.352

Review 6.  Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals and Male Reproductive Health: Do PFOA and PFOS Increase Risk for Male Infertility?

Authors:  Pheruza Tarapore; Bin Ouyang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Selectivity of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Sensors and Sorbents in Water.

Authors:  Yuqin Wang; Seth B Darling; Junhong Chen
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 9.229

8.  Invited Perspective: Current Breast Milk PFAS Levels in the United States and Canada Indicate Need for Additional Monitoring and Actions to Reduce Maternal Exposures.

Authors:  Gloria B Post
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 11.035

Review 9.  Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).

Authors:  Ian T Cousins; Jana H Johansson; Matthew E Salter; Bo Sha; Martin Scheringer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 10.  Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research.

Authors:  Suzanne E Fenton; Alan Ducatman; Alan Boobis; Jamie C DeWitt; Christopher Lau; Carla Ng; James S Smith; Stephen M Roberts
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.218

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.