| Literature DB >> 32843693 |
Chuen Wen Tan1, Wan Hui Wong2, McVin Hua Heng Cheen3, Yvonne Miao Hui Chu2, Shan Shan Lim2, Lawrence Cheng Kiat Ng2, Dillon Guo Dong Yeo2, Gayathry Morvil2, Lai Heng Lee2, Heng Joo Ng2.
Abstract
Infections cause varying degrees of haemostatic dysfunction which can be detected by clot waveform analysis (CWA), a global haemostatic marker. CWA has been shown to predict poor outcomes in severe infections with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. The effect of less severe bacterial and viral infections on CWA has not been established. We hypothesized that different infections influence CWA distinctively. Patients admitted with bacterial infections, dengue and upper respiratory tract viral infections were recruited if they had an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) measured on admission. APTT-based CWA was performed on Sysmex CS2100i automated analyser using Dade Actin FSL reagent. CWA parameters [(maximum velocity (min1), maximum acceleration (min2) and maximum deceleration (max2)] were compared against control patients. Infected patients (n = 101) had longer aPTT than controls (n = 112) (34.37 ± 7.72 s vs 27.80 ± 1.59 s, p < 0.001), with the mean (± SD) aPTT longest in dengue infection (n = 36) (37.99 ± 7.93 s), followed by bacterial infection (n = 52) (33.96 ± 7.33 s) and respiratory viral infection (n = 13) (29.98 ± 3.92 s). Compared to controls (min1; min2; max2) (5.53 ± 1.16%/s; 0.89 ± 0.19%/s2; 0.74 ± 0.16%/s2), bacterial infection has higher CWA results (6.92 ± 1.60%/s; 1.04 ± 0.28%/s2; 0.82 ± 0.24%/s2, all p < 0.05); dengue infection has significantly lower CWA values (3.93 ± 1.32%/s; 0.57 ± 0.17%/s2; 0.43 ± 0.14%/s2, all p < 0.001) whilst respiratory virus infection has similar results (6.19 ± 1.32%/s; 0.95 ± 0.21%/s2; 0.73 ± 0.18%/s2, all p > 0.05). CWA parameters demonstrated positive correlation with C-reactive protein levels (min1: r = 0.54, min2: r = 0.44, max2: r = 0.34; all p < 0.01). Different infections affect CWA distinctively. CWA could provide information on the haemostatic milieu triggered by infection and further studies are needed to better define its application in this area.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32843693 PMCID: PMC7447776 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71063-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of patients with infections and controls.
| Characteristics | Bacterial infection (n = 52) | Dengue infection (n = 36) | Other viral infection (n = 13) | Control (n = 112) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial vs. control | Dengue vs. control | Other virus vs. control | |||||
| Age, mean ± SD (years) | 64.8 ± 14.4 | 51.0 ± 14.5 | 82.1 ± 9.0 | 65.1 ± 11.0 | NS | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Male, n (%) | 33 (63.5) | 24 (66.7) | 6 (46.2) | 41 (36.6) | 0.001 | 0.002 | NS |
| NS | 0.001 | NS | |||||
| Chinese | 42 (80.8) | 23 (63.9) | 9 (69.2) | 97 (86.6) | |||
| Indian | 4 (7.7) | 5 (13.9) | 0 (0) | 6 (5.4) | |||
| Malay | 6 (11.5) | 2 (5.6) | 3 (23.1) | 7 (6.2) | |||
| Others | 0 (0) | 6 (16.7) | 1 (7.7) | 2 (1.8) | |||
Post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction were performed for pairwise comparisons.
SD standard deviation, NS non-significant (p > 0.05).
Comparison of clot waveform parameters between infected and control blood samples.
| CWA Parametera | Bacterial infection (n = 52) | Dengue infection (n = 36) | Other viral infection (n = 13) | Control (n = 112) | p-value (p-value after adjustment*) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria vs. control | Dengue vs. control | Other virus vs. control | Bacteria vs. dengue | Dengue vs. viral | Other virus vs. bacteria | |||||
| aPTT (s) | 32.96 ± 7.33 | 37.99 ± 7.93 | 29.99 ± 3.92 | 27.80 ± 1.59 | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | NS (NS) | 0.005 (0.002) | 0.003 (0.007) | NS (NS) |
| Min1 (%/s) | 6.92 ± 1.60 | 3.93 ± 1.02 | 6.19 ± 1.32 | 5.53 ± 1.16 | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | NS (NS) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | NS (NS) |
| Min2 (%/s2) | 1.04 ± 0.28 | 0.57 ± 0.17 | 0.95 ± 0.21 | 0.93 ± 0.46 | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | NS (NS) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | < 0.001 (0.001) | NS (NS) |
| Max2 (%/s2) | 0.82 ± 0.24 | 0.43 ± 0.14 | 0.73 ± 0.18 | 0.74 ± 0.16 | 0.036 (0.030) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | NS (NS) | < 0.001 (< 0.001) | < 0.001 (0.003) | NS (NS) |
Post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction were performed for pairwise comparisons.
CWA clot waveform analysis, SD standard deviation, NS non-significant (p > 0.05).
*Adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity.
aAll CWA results are expressed in mean ± SD.
Figure 1Comparison of clot waveform analysis (CWA) parameters between types of infection and control. Comparison of CWA parameters amongst study subjects with (A)–(C) demonstrating the min1, min2 and max2 results respectively. All p-values are adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity.
C-reactive protein and procalcitonin data amongst the patients with infection.
| Type of infection | CRP (mg/L) | Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases with data | Mean ± SD | No. of cases with data | Mean ± SD | |
| Bacterial infection | 42 | 155.3 ± 95.6 | 40 | 28.1 ± 41.3 |
| Dengue infection | 14 | 16.2 ± 14.4 | 12 | 0.4 ± 0.2 |
| Other viral infections | 8 | 55.9 ± 39.9 | 11 | 0.8 ± 1.3 |
CRP C-reactive protein, SD standard deviation.