| Literature DB >> 32843675 |
Intan Zarina Zainol Abidin1, Shazrul Fazry2, Nur Hidayah Jamar2, Herryawan Ryadi Ediwar Dyari3, Zaidah Zainal Ariffin4, Anis Nabilah Johari5, Nur Suhanawati Ashaari6, Nor Azfa Johari6, Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab7, Shahrul Hisham Zainal Ariffin8,9.
Abstract
In Malaysia, Piper sarmentosum or 'kaduk' is commonly used in traditional medicines. However, its biological effects including in vivo embryonic toxicity and tissue regenerative properties are relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo toxicities and caudal fin tissue regeneration in the presence of P. sarmentosum aqueous extracts. The phytochemical components and antioxidant activity of the extract were studied using GC-MS analysis and DPPH assay, respectively. Embryo toxicity tests involving survival, heartbeat, and morphological analyses were conducted to determine P. sarmentosum extract toxicity (0-60 µg/mL); concentrations of 0-400 µg/mL of the extract were used to study tissue regeneration in the zebrafish caudal fin. The extract contained several phytochemicals with antioxidant activity and exhibited DPPH scavenging activity (IC50 = 50.56 mg/mL). Embryo toxicity assays showed that a concentration of 60 μg/mL showed the highest rates of lethality regardless of exposure time. Slower embryogenesis was observed at 40 µg/mL, with non-viable embryos first detected at 50 µg/mL. Extracts showed significant differences (p < 0.01) for tissue regeneration at all concentrations when compared to non-treated samples. In conclusion, Piper sarmentosum extracts accelerated tissue regeneration, and extract concentrations at 60 µg/mL showed the highest toxicity levels for embryo viability.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32843675 PMCID: PMC7447815 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70962-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1GC–MS chromatograms of P. sarmentosum aqueous extract.
Phytochemical compounds and bioactivities identified in P. sarmentosum aqueous extract.
| Number | Retention time (minutes) | Name of the compound | Area Percentage (%) | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4542 | Hydrocinnamic acid | 16.4865 | Antioxidant[ |
| 2 | 12.5001 | 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | 2.5803 | Antioxidant[ |
| 3 | 13.1587 | gamma-Asarone | 9.8914 | Larvicidal[ |
| 4 | 13.4909 | 3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)propionic acid | 10.9005 | No activity reported |
| 5 | 13.7066 | beta-Asarone | 2.2622 | Antioxidant[ |
| 6 | 14.4002 | Asarone | 16.4926 | Antioxidant[ |
| 7 | 14.4468 | Dodecyl acrylate | 5.4597 | No activity reported |
| 8 | 15.1638 | 1-(2,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-one | 0.9606 | No activity reported |
| 9 | 16.0206 | (1R,4aR,7R,8aR)-7-(2-Hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1,4a-dimethyldecahydronaphthalen-1-ol | 1.5666 | Antipasmodic[ |
| 10 | 17.3262 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 9.3402 | Antioxidant[ |
| 11 | 17.7808 | Oxalic acid, propyl tetradecyl ester | 1.5682 | No activity reported |
| 12 | 18.7076 | Phytol | 0.8218 | Antioxidant[ |
| 13 | 19.1797 | Octadecanoic acid | 4.5081 | Antioxidant[ |
Figure 2DPPH radical scavenging activity of P. sarmentosum aqueous extract (n = 5).
Figure 3Survival rate at 24, 48 and 72 h (n = 3; 15 embryos/replicate).
Figure 4Percentage of embryos’ heartbeat at 24, 48 and 72 hpf (n = 3; 15 embryos/replicate).
Figure 5Embryo morphology at 24, 48 and 72 h at different concentration extract (n = 15).
Figure 6Caudal fin regeneration for 10 days in various concentrations of P. sarmentosum aqueous extract (n = 9).
Figure 7Tissue regeneration of Zebrafish caudal fin (each test represented by 6 male and 3 female zebrafish; n = 9).
Regeneration area of Zebrafish caudal fin treated with P. sarmentosum aqueous extract.
| Concentration of | Mean for caudal fin regeneration area of Zebrafish on respective day after amputation (mm2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 6 | Day 8 | Day 10 | ||||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 0 | 2.8 ± 0.98 | 2.3 ± 0.22 | 3.5 ± 0.67 | 2.6 ± 0.24 | 6.6 ± 0.70 | 7.7 ± 0.62 | 7.4 ± 1.13 | 8.1 ± 1.12 | 7.7 ± 0.97 | 8.8 ± 1.83 |
| 100 | 7.3 ± 2.13 | 4.6 ± 0.58 | 7.9 ± 2.25 | 5.1 ± 0.41 | 10.2 ± 0.92 | 9.2 ± 1.95 | 10.8 ± 1.51 | 10.3 ± 1.37 | 11.7 ± 1.29 | 11.9 ± 0.61 |
| 200 | 7.3 ± 0.80 | 7.7 ± 1.04 | 8.7 ± 0.76 | 8.4 ± 0.60 | 10.6 ± 0.56 | 10.6 ± 0.66 | 11.2 ± 0.69 | 12.3 ± 0.88 | 12.1 ± 1.26 | 12.8 ± 1.03 |
| 300 | 7.6 ± 1.13 | 7.1 ± 1.17 | 9.0 ± 0.94 | 8.1 ± 1.73 | 12.4 ± 0.03 | 10.6 ± 1.23 | 13.7 ± 1.10 | 12.4 ± 0.30 | 13.8 ± 1.48 | 12.9 ± 0.80 |
| 400 | 8.1 ± 1.53 | 8.9 ± 0.57 | 9.0 ± 1.32 | 10.1 ± 0.52 | 11.8 ± 1.42 | 12.2 ± 0.42 | 13.2 ± 1.21 | 13.7 ± 0.63 | 13.3 ± 0.59 | 14.3 ± 0.91 |
*Six male (n = 6) and three females (n = 3) were used for each concentration.