| Literature DB >> 32842829 |
Melissa S Burroughs Peña1, Jean Claude Uwamungu2, Catherine M Bulka3, Katrina Swett2,4, Krista M Perreira5, Mayank M Kansal6, Matthew Shane Loop7, Barry E Hurwitz8,9, Martha Daviglus6, Carlos J Rodriguez2,4.
Abstract
Background Our objective was to determine associations of occupational exposures with cardiac structure and function in Hispanic/Latino adults. Methods and Results Employed participants were included (n=782; 52% women, mean age 52.9 years). Occupational exposures to burning wood, vehicle exhaust, solvents, pesticides, and metals at the current and longest-held job were assessed by questionnaire. Survey multivariable linear regression analyses were used to model the relationship of each self-reported exposure with echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function. Exposure to burning wood at the current job was associated with decreased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (-3.1%; standard error [SE], 1.0 [P=0.002]). When the analysis was restricted to exposure at the longest-held job, occupational exposure to burning wood was associated with increased LV diastolic volume (6.7 mL; SE, 1.6 [P<0.0001]), decreased LV ejection fraction (-2.7%; SE, 0.6 [P<0.0001]), worse LV global longitudinal strain (1.0%; SE, 0.3 [P=0.0009]), and decreased right ventricular fractional area change (-0.02; SE, 0.004 [P<0.001]). Exposure to pesticides was associated with worse average global longitudinal strain (0.8%; SE, 0.2 [P<0.0001]). Exposure to metals was associated with worse global longitudinal strain in the 2-chamber view (1.0%; SE, 0.5 [P=0.04]), increased stroke volume (3.6 mL; SE, 1.6 [P=0.03]), and increased LV mass indexed to BSA (9.2 g/m2; SE, 3.8 [P=0.01]) or height (4.4 g/m2.7; SE, 1.9 [P=0.02]). Conclusions Occupational exposures to burning wood, vehicle exhaust, pesticides, and metals were associated with abnormal parameters of LV and right ventricular systolic function. Reducing exposures to toxic chemicals and particulates in the workplace is a potential opportunity to prevent cardiovascular disease in populations at risk.Entities:
Keywords: air pollution; echocardiography; environmental medicine; occupational medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32842829 PMCID: PMC7660755 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Occupational exposure of participants in ECHO‐SOL (Echocardiographic Study of Latinos).
All employed participants provided information about occupational exposures. Occupational exposure at the longest‐held job applies to participants whose current job was also the longest‐held job.
Characteristics of Individuals With and Without Occupational Exposures to Heavy Metals, Solvents, Pesticides, Burning Wood, and Vehicle Exhaust in ECHO‐SOL
| Any Occupational Exposure (n=168) | No Occupational Exposure (n=614) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SE) | 51.6 (0.5) | 53.3 (0.3) |
| Women, % | 21.8 | 60.2 |
| National background, % | ||
| Dominican | 24.8 | 20.9 |
| Puerto Rican | 12.7 | 10.4 |
| Mexican | 25.9 | 25.9 |
| Cuban | 28.2 | 28.2 |
| Central American | 7.2 | 7.7 |
| South American | 4.6 | 6.9 |
| Low physical activity, % | 29.3 | 44.5 |
| Body mass index, mean (SE) | 29.2 (0.4) | 29.8 (0.3) |
| Current tobacco use, % | 19.8 | 12.1 |
| Current alcohol use, % | 62.0 | 50.1 |
| Less than high school education | 35.6 | 22.0 |
| Household income <$20 000 per y | 39.2 | 37.9 |
| US mainland nativity, % | 11.4 | 8.4 |
Values presented are unweighted counts of total participants in HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos) with respective characteristic. Percentages are weighted row percentages. ECHO‐SOL indicates Echocardiographic Study of Latinos; and SE, standard error.
Association of Occupational Exposure to Burning Wood and Vehicle Exhaust at Longest‐Held Job With Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Structure and Function in ECHO‐SOL
| Burning Wood | Vehicle Exhaust | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Model 1 |
| Adjusted Model 2 |
| Adjusted Model 1 |
| Adjusted Model 2 |
| |
| LV structure | ||||||||
| LV mass index, g/m2 | 7.2 (4.1) | 0.08 | 7.1 (4.6) | 0.12 | 0.5 (2.0) | 0.80 | 1.3 (2.0) | 0.54 |
| LV mass index, g/m2.7 | 4.3 (1.8) | 0.02 | 3.9 (2.2) | 0.08 | −0.2 (0.9) | 0.86 | 0.6 (1.0) | 0.56 |
| LV end‐diastolic volume, mL | 6.6 (1.4) | <0.0001 | 6.7 (1.6) | <0.0001 | 2.2 (1.6) | 0.16 | 2.8 (1.6) | 0.07 |
| LV end‐systolic volume, mL | 4.3 (0.9) | <0.0001 | 4.6 (0.9) | <0.0001 | 0.8 (0.7) | 0.27 | 1.2 (0.7) | 0.08 |
| LV systolic function | ||||||||
| LV ejection fraction, % | −2.5 (0.6) | <0.0001 | −2.7 (0.6) | <0.0001 | −0.4 (0.5) | 0.43 | −0.5 (0.4) | 0.24 |
| LV stroke volume, mL | 1.4 (0.8) | 0.07 | 1.8 (0.9) | 0.04 | 1.4 (1.3) | 0.26 | 1.9 (1.2) | 0.11 |
| LV longitudinal strain (4‐chamber), % | 1.2 (0.3) | 0.0003 | 1.1 (0.3) | 0.0003 | −0.05 (0.2) | 0.84 | −0.09 (0.2) | 0.71 |
| LV longitudinal strain (2‐chamber), % | 1.0 (0.3) | 0.0002 | 0.6 (0.3) | 0.04 | 0.5 (0.2) | 0.03 | 0.5 (0.2) | 0.03 |
| LV longitudinal strain (average), % | 1.2 (0.3) | <0.0001 | 1.0 (0.3) | 0.0009 | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.19 | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.20 |
| LV diastolic function | ||||||||
| Medial E′ velocity, cm/s | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.0001 | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.0001 | −0.2 (0.2) | 0.27 | −0.04 (0.2) | 0.82 |
| Lateral E′ velocity, cm/s | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.02 | 0.7 (0.3) | 0.04 | 0.04 (0.3) | 0.87 | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.59 |
| E/E′ ratio | −0.03 (0.1) | 0.78 | 0.07 (0.2) | 0.66 | 0.3 (0.1) | 0.01 | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.11 |
| E/A ratio | 0.0008 (0.03) | 0.98 | −0.0004 (0.3) | 0.99 | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.50 | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.38 |
| Isovolumic relaxation time, s | 0.008 (0.001) | <0.0001 | 0.008 (0.001) | <0.0001 | 0.003 (0.002) | 0.06 | 0.0004 (0.002) | 0.79 |
| LA volume index, mL/m2 | 0.8 (0.3) | 0.008 | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.05 | 0.1 (0.6) | 0.82 | −0.1 (0.6) | 0.84 |
| RV function | ||||||||
| Peak RA/RV gradient, mm Hg | 3.7 (0.3) | <0.0001 | 3.7 (0.3) | <0.0001 | −1.6 (0.7) | 0.03 | −1.3 (0.7) | 0.05 |
| TAPSE, cm | −0.02 (0.03) | 0.58 | −0.03 (0.03) | 0.34 | −0.1 (0.04) | 0.004 | −0.1 (0.04) | 0.001 |
| RV fractional area change | −0.02 (0.004) | 0.0003 | −0.02 (0.004) | <0.0001 | 0.006 (0.06) | 0.35 | 0.004 (0.007) | 0.59 |
Linear regression analyses are reported comparing the respective outcome variable cardiac parameter between exposed and unexposed patients. Regression coefficients are presented amounting to the average increase (positive numbers) or decrease (negative numbers) (with standard error) in the respective cardiac parameter with the particular exposure. Model 1: age and sex; and model 2: age, sex, study site, tobacco use, alcohol use, physical activity, and years of education. ECHO‐SOL indicates Echocardiographic Study of Latinos; LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricular; RA, right atrial; RV, right ventricular; and TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
Association of Occupational Exposure to Solvents, Pesticides, and Metals at Longest‐Held Job With Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Structure and Function in ECHO‐SOL
| Solvents | Pesticides | Metals | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Model 1 |
| Adjusted Model 2 |
| Adjusted Model 1 |
| Adjusted Model 2 |
| Adjusted Model 1 |
| Adjusted Model 2 |
| |
| LV structure | ||||||||||||
| LV mass index, g/m2 | −2.2 (1.0) | 0.03 | −1.4 (1.0) | 0.14 | 4.6 (2.3) | 0.047 | 3.0 (2.5) | 0.23 | 8.5 (3.3) | 0.09 | 9.2 (3.8) | 0.01 |
| LV mass index, g/m2.7 | −0.6 (0.9) | 0.51 | −0.1 (0.6) | 0.89 | 3.1 (1.2) | 0.009 | 1.9 (1.2) | 0.11 | 4.7 (1.6) | 0.003 | 4.4 (1.9) | 0.02 |
| LV end‐diastolic volume, mL | 5.7 (3.7) | 0.12 | 5.4 (2.6) | 0.04 | −2.9 (1.7) | 0.09 | −3.3 (1.8) | 0.07 | 2.6 (1.9) | 0.16 | 2.6 (2.9) | 0.38 |
| LV end‐systolic volume, mL | 1.4 (1.5) | 0.33 | 1.4 (1.0) | 0.17 | −1.2 (0.6) | 0.0498 | −0.8 (0.6) | 0.22 | 0.1 (0.9) | 0.89 | −0.1 (1.3) | 0.92 |
| LV systolic function | ||||||||||||
| LV ejection fraction, % | 0.7 (0.3) | 0.01 | 0.7 (0.3) | 0.008 | 0.1 (0.4) | 0.80 | −0.08 (0.5) | 0.87 | 0.04 (0.7) | 0.95 | 0.4 (0.6) | 0.54 |
| LV stroke volume, mL | 0.3 (1.6) | 0.84 | 0.2 (1.3) | 0.88 | 4.8 (2.0) | 0.02 | 4.3 (2.4) | 0.08 | 2.9 (1.4) | 0.04 | 3.6 (1.6) | 0.03 |
| LV longitudinal strain (4‐chamber), % | −0.4 (0.2) | 0.07 | −0.4 (0.2) | 0.047 | 0.9 (0.2) | 0.0001 | 0.8 (0.3) | 0.001 | −0.1 (0.3) | 0.72 | −0.4 (0.4) | 0.28 |
| LV longitudinal strain (2‐chamber), % | −0.9 (0.2) | 0.0002 | −0.9 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 1.1 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.009 | 1.5 (0.4) | 0.0002 | 1.0 (0.5) | 0.04 |
| LV longitudinal strain (average), % | −0.6 (0.2) | 0.0001 | −0.6 (0.1) | <0.0001 | 1.0 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.8 (0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.8 (0.3) | 0.02 | 0.4 (0.4) | 0.28 |
| LV diastolic function | ||||||||||||
| Medial E′ velocity, cm/s | 0.3 (0.1) | 0.003 | 0.4 (0.09) | <0.0001 | 0.7 (0.1) | <0.0001 | 0.6 (0.1) | <0.0001 | −0.04 (0.2) | 0.87 | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.68 |
| Lateral E′ velocity, cm/s | −0.2 (0.2) | 0.40 | −0.08 (0.19) | 0.66 | 1.2 (0.3) | <0.0001 | 0.9 (0.3) | 0.0009 | 0.9 (0.4) | 0.02 | 1.2 (0.4) | 0.006 |
| E/E′ ratio | 0.7 (0.1) | <0.0001 | 0.6 (0.1) | <0.0001 | 0.05 (0.1) | 0.70 | 0.2 (0.2) | 0.38 | 0.2 (0.3) | 0.54 | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.73 |
| E/A ratio | −0.008 (0.02) | 0.69 | −0.009 (0.02) | 0.66 | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.31 | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.40 | −0.3 (0.06) | 0.65 | −0.0004 (0.06) | 0.99 |
| Isovolumic relaxation time, s | −0.001 (0.001) | 0.26 | −0.002 (0.001) | 0.054 | −0.001 (0.001) | 0.30 | −0.001 (0.001) | 0.28 | 0.01 (0.002) | <0.0001 | 0.007 (0.002) | 0.0003 |
| LA volume index, mL/m2 | 0.6 (0.7) | 0.40 | 0.2 (0.6) | 0.75 | −2.3 (0.6) | 0.0003 | −2.5 (0.8) | 0.0009 | 1.1 (0.7) | 0.14 | 1.4 (0.9) | 0.13 |
| RV function | ||||||||||||
| Peak RA/RV gradient, mm Hg | 0.6 (0.4) | 0.16 | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.03 | 1.6 (0.7) | 0.02 | 1.1 (0.6) | 0.09 | 0.2 (0.7) | 0.78 | 0.4 (0.8) | 0.56 |
| TAPSE, cm | 0.1 (0.03) | <0.0001 | 0.1 (0.02) | <0.0001 | −0.04 (0.04) | 0.27 | −0.06 (0.04) | 0.13 | −0.02 (0.05) | 0.63 | −0.06 (0.06) | 0.35 |
| RV fractional area change | 0.02 (0.005) | <0.0001 | 0.02 (0.005) | 0.0002 | 0.02 (0.007) | 0.025 | −0.002 (0.008) | 0.75 | 0.004 | 0.51 | 0.002 (0.009) | 0.80 |
Linear regression analyses are reported comparing the respective outcome variable cardiac parameter between exposed and unexposed patients. Regression coefficients are presented amounting to the average increase (positive numbers) or decrease (negative numbers) (with standard error) in the respective cardiac parameter with the particular exposure. Model 1: age and sex; and model 2: age, sex, study site, tobacco use, alcohol use, physical activity, and years of education. ECHO‐SOL indicates Echocardiographic Study of Latinos; LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricular; RA, right atrial; RV, right ventricular; and TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.