Naveen L Pereira1, Michael E Farkouh2, Derek So3, Ryan Lennon4, Nancy Geller5, Verghese Mathew6, Malcolm Bell1, Jang-Ho Bae7, Myung Ho Jeong8, Ivan Chavez9, Paul Gordon10, J Dawn Abbott11, Charles Cagin12, Linnea Baudhuin13, Yi-Ping Fu5, Shaun G Goodman14,15, Ahmed Hasan5, Erin Iturriaga5, Amir Lerman1, Mandeep Sidhu16, Jean-Francois Tanguay17, Liewei Wang18, Richard Weinshilboum18, Robert Welsh19, Yves Rosenberg5, Kent Bailey4, Charanjit Rihal1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 6. Department of Medicine, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Konyang University, Seo-gu, Taejon, South Korea. 8. Heart Research Center, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea. 9. Department of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 10. Division of Cardiology, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 11. Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 12. Mayo Clinic Health System-La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin. 13. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 14. St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 15. Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. 16. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical Center and Albany Medical College, Albany, New York. 17. Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 18. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 19. Department of Medicine, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 loss-of-function (LOF) variants treated with clopidogrel have increased risk of ischemic events. Whether genotype-guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy improves ischemic outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine the effect of a genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor strategy on ischemic outcomes in CYP2C19 LOF carriers after PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label randomized clinical trial of 5302 patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were enrolled at 40 centers in the US, Canada, South Korea, and Mexico from May 2013 through October 2018; final date of follow-up was October 2019. Interventions: Patients randomized to the genotype-guided group (n = 2652) underwent point-of-care genotyping. CYP2C19 LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor and noncarriers clopidogrel. Patients randomized to the conventional group (n = 2650) were prescribed clopidogrel and underwent genotyping after 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia at 12 months. A secondary end point was major or minor bleeding at 12 months. The primary analysis was in patients with CYP2C19 LOF variants, and secondary analysis included all randomized patients. The trial had 85% power to detect a minimum hazard ratio of 0.50. Results: Among 5302 patients randomized (median age, 62 years; 25% women), 82% had ACS and 18% had stable CAD; 94% completed the trial. Of 1849 with CYP2C19 LOF variants, 764 of 903 (85%) assigned to genotype-guided therapy received ticagrelor, and 932 of 946 (99%) assigned to conventional therapy received clopidogrel. The primary end point occurred in 35 of 903 CYP2C19 LOF carriers (4.0%) in the genotype-guided therapy group and 54 of 946 (5.9%) in the conventional therapy group at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43-1.02]; P = .06). None of the 11 prespecified secondary end points showed significant differences, including major or minor bleeding in CYP2C19 LOF carriers in the genotype-guided group (1.9%) vs the conventional therapy group (1.6%) at 12 months (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P = .58). Among all randomized patients, the primary end point occurred in 113 of 2641 (4.4%) in the genotype-guided group and 135 of 2635 (5.3%) in the conventional group (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.07]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: Among CYP2C19 LOF carriers with ACS and stable CAD undergoing PCI, genotype-guided selection of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with conventional clopidogrel therapy without point-of-care genotyping, resulted in no statistically significant difference in a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia based on the prespecified analysis plan and the treatment effect that the study was powered to detect at 12 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742117.
RCT Entities:
Importance: After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patients with CYP2C19*2 or *3 loss-of-function (LOF) variants treated with clopidogrel have increased risk of ischemic events. Whether genotype-guided selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy improves ischemic outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine the effect of a genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor strategy on ischemic outcomes in CYP2C19 LOF carriers after PCI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label randomized clinical trial of 5302 patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were enrolled at 40 centers in the US, Canada, South Korea, and Mexico from May 2013 through October 2018; final date of follow-up was October 2019. Interventions: Patients randomized to the genotype-guided group (n = 2652) underwent point-of-care genotyping. CYP2C19 LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor and noncarriers clopidogrel. Patients randomized to the conventional group (n = 2650) were prescribed clopidogrel and underwent genotyping after 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia at 12 months. A secondary end point was major or minor bleeding at 12 months. The primary analysis was in patients with CYP2C19 LOF variants, and secondary analysis included all randomized patients. The trial had 85% power to detect a minimum hazard ratio of 0.50. Results: Among 5302 patients randomized (median age, 62 years; 25% women), 82% had ACS and 18% had stable CAD; 94% completed the trial. Of 1849 with CYP2C19 LOF variants, 764 of 903 (85%) assigned to genotype-guided therapy received ticagrelor, and 932 of 946 (99%) assigned to conventional therapy received clopidogrel. The primary end point occurred in 35 of 903 CYP2C19 LOF carriers (4.0%) in the genotype-guided therapy group and 54 of 946 (5.9%) in the conventional therapy group at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43-1.02]; P = .06). None of the 11 prespecified secondary end points showed significant differences, including major or minor bleeding in CYP2C19 LOF carriers in the genotype-guided group (1.9%) vs the conventional therapy group (1.6%) at 12 months (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P = .58). Among all randomized patients, the primary end point occurred in 113 of 2641 (4.4%) in the genotype-guided group and 135 of 2635 (5.3%) in the conventional group (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.07]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: Among CYP2C19 LOF carriers with ACS and stable CAD undergoing PCI, genotype-guided selection of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor, compared with conventional clopidogrel therapy without point-of-care genotyping, resulted in no statistically significant difference in a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia based on the prespecified analysis plan and the treatment effect that the study was powered to detect at 12 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742117.
Authors: David R Holmes; Gregory J Dehmer; Sanjay Kaul; Dana Leifer; Patrick T O'Gara; C Michael Stein Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel M F Claassens; Gerrit J A Vos; Thomas O Bergmeijer; Renicus S Hermanides; Arnoud W J van 't Hof; Pim van der Harst; Emanuele Barbato; Carmine Morisco; Richard M Tjon Joe Gin; Folkert W Asselbergs; Arend Mosterd; Jean-Paul R Herrman; Willem J M Dewilde; Paul W A Janssen; Johannes C Kelder; Maarten J Postma; Anthonius de Boer; Cornelis Boersma; Vera H M Deneer; Jurriën M Ten Berg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J H Chesebro; G Knatterud; R Roberts; J Borer; L S Cohen; J Dalen; H T Dodge; C K Francis; D Hillis; P Ludbrook Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lars Wallentin; Richard C Becker; Andrzej Budaj; Christopher P Cannon; Håkan Emanuelsson; Claes Held; Jay Horrow; Steen Husted; Stefan James; Hugo Katus; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Benjamin M Scirica; Allan Skene; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Robert F Storey; Robert A Harrington; Anneli Freij; Mona Thorsén Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sukhdeep S Basra; Tracy Y Wang; DaJuanicia N Simon; Karen Chiswell; Salim S Virani; Mahboob Alam; Vijay Nambi; Ali E Denktas; Anita Deswal; Biykem Bozkurt; Christie M Ballantyne; Eric D Peterson; Hani Jneid Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Linnea M Baudhuin; Laura J Train; Shaun G Goodman; Gary E Lane; Ryan J Lennon; Verghese Mathew; Vishakantha Murthy; Tamim M Nazif; Derek Y F So; John P Sweeney; Alan H B Wu; Charanjit S Rihal; Michael E Farkouh; Naveen L Pereira Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Vibhu Parcha; Brittain F Heindl; Peng Li; Rajat Kalra; Nita A Limdi; Naveen L Pereira; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora Journal: Circ Genom Precis Med Date: 2021-10-21
Authors: Clint L Miller; Amy R Kontorovich; Ke Hao; Lijiang Ma; Conrad Iyegbe; Johan L M Björkegren; Jason C Kovacic Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Davide Capodanno; Deepak L Bhatt; C Michael Gibson; Stefan James; Takeshi Kimura; Roxana Mehran; Sunil V Rao; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Philip Urban; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Windecker; Dominick J Angiolillo Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 32.419