Literature DB >> 21862109

Determination of cut-off levels for on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation based on functional CYP2C19 gene variants in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Takamichi Ono1, Koichi Kaikita, Seiji Hokimoto, Satomi Iwashita, Koichiro Yamamoto, Yuji Miyazaki, Eiji Horio, Koji Sato, Kenichi Tsujita, Tomohide Abe, Mariko Deguchi, Shinji Tayama, Hitoshi Sumida, Seigo Sugiyama, Hiroshige Yamabe, Sunao Nakamura, Kazuko Nakagawa, Hisao Ogawa.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Carriers of reduced-function CYP2C19 allele on antiplatelet therapy show diminished platelet inhibition and higher rate of clinical risk. The purpose of this study was to determine cut-off levels of VerifyNow P2Y12 system associated with effective inhibition of on-clopidogrel platelet aggregation to predict carriers of CYP2C19 reduced-function allele among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 202 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI and treated with clopidogrel. All patients underwent CYP2C19 genotyping and measurement of residual platelet aggregation by VerifyNow system.
RESULTS: Carriers of CYP2C19 reduced-function allele constituted 131 (65%) of 202 CAD patients. Platelet inhibition measured by P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and %inhibition was diminished in carriers compared with noncarriers (PRU: 290.0±81.2 vs 217.6±82.4, p<0.001, %inhibition: 17.9±17.8 vs 35.5±22.8, p<0.001, respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified PRU and %inhibition as significant predictors of carrier state [odds ratio (OR) 4.95; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.49 to 9.85; p<0.001, OR 5.55; 95%CI: 2.80 to 10.99; p<0.001, respectively]. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that PRU and %inhibition were significant predictors of carrier state [area under the curve (AUC) 0.736 (95%CI: 0.664 to 0.808; p<0.001), AUC 0.727 (95%CI: 0.651 to 0.803; p<0.001), respectively]. The cut-off levels of PRU and %inhibition were 256 and 26.5% for the identification of carriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the cut-off levels of PRU and %inhibition to discriminate carriers of CYP2C19 reduced-function allele from noncarriers are potentially useful clinically to provide optimal clopidogrel therapy in patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862109     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  9 in total

1.  Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Naveen L Pereira; Charanjit S Rihal; Derek Y F So; Yves Rosenberg; Ryan J Lennon; Verghese Mathew; Shaun G Goodman; Richard M Weinshilboum; Liewei Wang; Linnea M Baudhuin; Amir Lerman; Ahmed Hasan; Erin Iturriaga; Yi-Ping Fu; Nancy Geller; Kent Bailey; Michael E Farkouh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Incidence of microemboli and correlation with platelet inhibition in aneurysmal flow diversion.

Authors:  M R Levitt; B V Ghodke; D K Hallam; L N Sekhar; L J Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Current Concepts in the Clinical Utility of Platelet Reactivity Testing.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Collet
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  Cytochrome allelic variants and clopidogrel metabolism in cardiovascular diseases therapy.

Authors:  Mohammed Jarrar; Shalini Behl; Ganiraju Manyam; Hany Ganah; Mohammed Nazir; Reem Nasab; Khaled Moustafa
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TAILOR-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Naveen L Pereira; Michael E Farkouh; Derek So; Ryan Lennon; Nancy Geller; Verghese Mathew; Malcolm Bell; Jang-Ho Bae; Myung Ho Jeong; Ivan Chavez; Paul Gordon; J Dawn Abbott; Charles Cagin; Linnea Baudhuin; Yi-Ping Fu; Shaun G Goodman; Ahmed Hasan; Erin Iturriaga; Amir Lerman; Mandeep Sidhu; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Liewei Wang; Richard Weinshilboum; Robert Welsh; Yves Rosenberg; Kent Bailey; Charanjit Rihal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  A systematic review and critical assessment of 11 discordant meta-analyses on reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in clopidogrel users.

Authors:  Ruben L Osnabrugge; Stuart J Head; Felix Zijlstra; Jurriën M ten Berg; Myriam G Hunink; A Pieter Kappetein; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Adjunctive cilostazol versus high maintenance dose of clopidogrel in patients with hyporesponsiveness to chronic clopidogrel therapy.

Authors:  Ga Yeon Lee; Joo-Yong Hahn; Soo-Youn Lee; Hee-Jin Kim; Jun Hyung Kim; Sang-Yup Lee; Young Bin Song; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System Predicts Periprocedural Bleeding Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Yu Oimatsu; Koichi Kaikita; Masanobu Ishii; Tatsuro Mitsuse; Miwa Ito; Yuichiro Arima; Daisuke Sueta; Aya Takahashi; Satomi Iwashita; Eiichiro Yamamoto; Sunao Kojima; Seiji Hokimoto; Kenichi Tsujita
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Differential Impact of Clinical and Genetic Factors on High Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Clopidogrel and Prasugrel.

Authors:  Yuichi Saito; Takeshi Nishi; Shinichi Wakabayashi; Yuji Ohno; Hideki Kitahara; Noritaka Ariyoshi; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.394

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.