Literature DB >> 32840469

T2 Relaxation Times at Cardiac MRI in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Christopher A Hanson1, Akshay Kamath1, Matthew Gottbrecht1, Sami Ibrahim1, Michael Salerno1.   

Abstract

Background T2 mapping is an important cardiac MRI technique with applications in various conditions. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the T2 literature for normal values is lacking. Purpose To characterize the ranges of normal values and variability of myocardial T2 relaxation times using a systematic review and meta-analysis of the T2 literature. Materials and Methods PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched from June 2019 to January 2020 for myocardial T2 measurements in healthy adults. Studies quantifying T2 relaxation times conducted at 1.5 T or 3.0 T using gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) or T2-prepared balanced steady-state free precession sequences were included. Summary means were generated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess factors causing heterogeneity. Results Of the 2481 articles retrieved, 42 studies were included with 954 healthy adults (mean age, 42.4 years ± 10.5 [standard deviation]; 538 men). The pooled mean of T2 across studies was 52 msec at 1.5 T (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51 msec, 53 msec) and 46 msec at 3.0 T (95% CI: 44 msec, 48 msec) (P ≤ .001). I2 was 98% at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Meta-regression at 1.5 T and 3.0 T identified vendor (β at 1.5 T = -4 msec [with Philips as reference], P < .001; β at 3.0 T = -5 msec, P = .02) and pulse sequence (β at 1.5 T = -5 msec [with GRASE as reference], P < .001; β at 3.0 T = -6 msec, P = .002) as significant covariates, but it did not identify any association with covariates of age (β at 1.5 T = 0 msec per year, P = .70; β at 3.0 T = 0 msec per year, P = .83) or sex (β at 1.5 T = -1 msec, P = .88; β at 3.0 T = 6 msec, P = .42). Conclusion The pooled mean of T2 relaxation times in healthy adults had marked heterogeneity across studies with field strength, vendor, and pulse sequence identified as covariates associated with T2. T2-prepared measurements were similar between vendors at each field strength. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32840469      PMCID: PMC7605362          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  T2 measurement of the human myocardium using a T2-prepared transient-state TrueFISP sequence.

Authors:  Teng-Yi Huang; Yi-Jui Liu; Alto Stemmer; Brigitte P Poncelet
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  MRI-Derived Myocardial Strain Measures in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Ha Q Vo; Thomas H Marwick; Kazuaki Negishi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-17

3.  Effects of temperature and histopathologic preparation on the size and morphology of atherosclerotic carotid arteries as imaged by MRI.

Authors:  S Dalager-Pedersen; E Falk; S Ringgaard; I B Kristensen; E M Pedersen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Improved detection of myocardial involvement in acute inflammatory cardiomyopathies using T2 mapping.

Authors:  Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Michael Walls; Shivraman Giri; David Verhaert; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Sean Moore; Orlando P Simonetti; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury.

Authors:  David Verhaert; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Shivraman Giri; Georgeta Mihai; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Orlando P Simonetti; Subha V Raman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03

Review 6.  T1, T2 Mapping and Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV): Application, Value and Further Perspectives in Myocardial Inflammation and Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  F C Roller; S Harth; C Schneider; G A Krombach
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance T2 mapping in the monitoring and follow-up of acute cardiac transplant rejection: a pilot study.

Authors:  Asad A Usman; Kirsi Taimen; Marie Wasielewski; Jennifer McDonald; Saurabh Shah; Shivraman Giri; William Cotts; Edwin McGee; Robert Gordon; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl; James C Carr
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 8.  Advances in parametric mapping with CMR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07

9.  Native T1 and Extracellular Volume Measurements by Cardiac MRI in Healthy Adults: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Gottbrecht; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 29.146

10.  Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; James C Moon; Vanessa M Ferreira; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Taigang He; Peter Kellman; Julia Mascherbauer; Reza Nezafat; Michael Salerno; Erik B Schelbert; Andrew J Taylor; Richard Thompson; Martin Ugander; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

1.  The New Role of Cardiac Imaging Following the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Authors:  Christopher A Hanson; Toral R Patel; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 2.  Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Jana G Delfino; Kalina V Jordanova; Megan E Poorman; Prathyush Chirra; Akshay S Chaudhari; Bettina Baessler; Jessica Winfield; Satish E Viswanath; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 3.  T2 mapping in myocardial disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Aaron T O'Brien; Katarzyna E Gil; Juliet Varghese; Orlando P Simonetti; Karolina M Zareba
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.903

4.  Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of MRI T1 measurement using the system phantom.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Zydrunas Gimbutas; Andrew Dienstfrey; Karl F Stupic; Michael A Boss; Stephen E Russek; Thomas L Chenevert; P V Prasad; Junyu Guo; Wilburn E Reddick; Kim M Cecil; Amita Shukla-Dave; David Aramburu Nunez; Amaresh Shridhar Konar; Michael Z Liu; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Jie Zheng; Peng Hu; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.