Literature DB >> 32839900

How Effective is Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy (NET) in Downstaging the Axilla and Achieving Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Giacomo Montagna1, Varadan Sevilimedu2, Monica Fornier3, Komal Jhaveri3, Monica Morrow1, Melissa L Pilewskie4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is effective in downstaging large hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers and increasing rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but data regarding nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) are sparse. We reported nodal and breast downstaging rates with NET, and compared axillary response rates following NET and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
METHODS: Consecutive stage I-III breast cancer patients treated with NET and surgery from January 2009 to December 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Nodal pCR rates were compared between biopsy-proven node-positive patients treated with NET, and HR+/HER2- patients treated with NAC from November 2013 to July 2019.
RESULTS: 127 cancers treated with NET and 338 with NAC were included. NET recipients were older, more likely to have lobular and lower-grade tumors, and higher HR expression. With NET, the nodal pCR rate was 11% (4/38) of biopsy-proven cases, and the breast pCR rate was 1.6% (2/126). Nodal-dowstaging rates with NET and NAC were not significantly different (11% vs 18%; P = 0.37). Patients achieving nodal pCR with NET versus NAC were older (median age 70 vs 50, P = 0.004) and had greater progesterone receptor (PR) expression (85% vs 13%, P = 0.031), respectively. Of patients not candidates for BCS due to a large tumor relative to breast size, 36/47 (77%) became BCS-eligible with NET (median PR expression 55% vs 5% in those remaining ineligible, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Although nodal pCR is more frequent than breast pCR, NET is more likely to de-escalate breast surgery than axillary surgery. However, with a nodal pCR rate of 11%, NET remains an option for downstaging node-positive patients without clear indications for NAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32839900      PMCID: PMC7554166          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08888-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

1.  How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissection in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Andrea V Barrio; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee; George Plitas; Melissa Pilewskie; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Mary L Gemignani; Alexandra S Heerdt; Lisa M Sclafani; Virgilio Sacchini; Hiram S Cody; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Optimum duration of neoadjuvant letrozole to permit breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Robert Carpenter; Julie C Doughty; Carolyn Cordiner; Nuala Moss; Ashu Gandhi; Chris Wilson; Chris Andrews; Gillian Ellis; Gerald Gui; Anthony I Skene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Results from the GEICAM/2006-03, multicenter study.

Authors:  E Alba; J I Chacon; A Lluch; A Anton; L Estevez; B Cirauqui; E Carrasco; L Calvo; M A Segui; N Ribelles; R Alvarez; A Sanchez-Muñoz; R Sanchez; J A Lopez Garcia-Asenjo; C Rodriguez-Martin; M J Escudero; J Albanell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Patterns of Axillary Management in Stages 2 and 3 Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer by Initial Treatment Approach.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Stephanie Wong; Mehra Golshan; Rachel A Freedman; Otto Metzger; Jennifer Bellon; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Tari A King
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  One-Year Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Orsolya Rusz; András Vörös; Zoltán Varga; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Gabriella Uhercsák; Alíz Nikolényi; Katalin Ormándi; Zsolt Simonka; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 6.  Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rossi; Amelia McCartney; Emanuela Risi; Irene De Santo; Ilenia Migliaccio; Luca Malorni; Laura Biganzoli; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Neoadjuvant letrozole plus taselisib versus letrozole plus placebo in postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer (LORELEI): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Cristina Saura; Dominik Hlauschek; Mafalda Oliveira; Dimitrios Zardavas; Anita Jallitsch-Halper; Lorena de la Peña; Paolo Nuciforo; Alberto Ballestrero; Peter Dubsky; Janine M Lombard; Peter Vuylsteke; Carlos A Castaneda; Marco Colleoni; Giuliano Santos Borges; Eva Ciruelos; Monica Fornier; Katalin Boer; Aditya Bardia; Timothy R Wilson; Thomas J Stout; Jerry Y Hsu; Yi Shi; Martine Piccart; Michael Gnant; José Baselga; Evandro de Azambuja
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis; Vera J Suman; Jeremy Hoog; Li Lin; Jacqueline Snider; Aleix Prat; Joel S Parker; Jingqin Luo; Katherine DeSchryver; D Craig Allred; Laura J Esserman; Gary W Unzeitig; Julie Margenthaler; Gildy V Babiera; P Kelly Marcom; Joseph M Guenther; Mark A Watson; Marilyn Leitch; Kelly Hunt; John A Olson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Linda M McCall; Karla V Ballman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Teresa Flippo-Morton; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Innovative Standards in Surgery of the Breast after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Tal Hadar; Michael Koretz; Mahmood Nawass; Tanir M Allweis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Assessment of preoperative axillary nodal disease burden: breast MRI in locally advanced breast cancer before, during and after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Jürgen Geisler; Jonn Terje Geitung; Joana Reis; Joao Boavida; Hang T Tran; Marianne Lyngra; Laurens Cornelus Reitsma; Hossein Schandiz; Woldegabriel A Melles; Kjell-Inge Gjesdal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Neoadjuvant approach in patients with early breast cancer: patient assessment, staging, and planning.

Authors:  Isabel T Rubio; Carolina Sobrido
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  The Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment on Luminal-like Breast Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance: Results from a Single-Institution Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Covadonga Martí; Laura Yébenes; José María Oliver; Elisa Moreno; Laura Frías; Alberto Berjón; Adolfo Loayza; Marcos Meléndez; María José Roca; Vicenta Córdoba; David Hardisson; María Ángeles Rodríguez; José Ignacio Sánchez-Méndez
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  The Virtual Scientific Sessions from the American Society of Breast Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Surgical Management of Axilla Following Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy.

Authors:  Brenna M Murphy; Tanya L Hoskin; Amy C Degnim; Judy C Boughey; Tina J Hieken
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.