| Literature DB >> 32839540 |
E Huber1, R Patel2,3, M Hupp1, N Weiskopf4,5, M M Chakravarty2,3,6, P Freund7,8,9,10.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to wide-spread neurodegeneration across the neuroaxis. We explored trajectories of surface morphology, demyelination and iron concentration within the basal ganglia-thalamic circuit over 2 years post-SCI. This allowed us to explore the predictive value of neuroimaging biomarkers and determine their suitability as surrogate markers for interventional trials. Changes in markers of surface morphology, myelin and iron concentration of the basal ganglia and thalamus were estimated from 182 MRI datasets acquired in 17 SCI patients and 21 healthy controls at baseline (1-month post injury for patients), after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Using regression models, we investigated group difference in linear and non-linear trajectories of these markers. Baseline quantitative MRI parameters were used to predict 24-month clinical outcome. Surface area contracted in the motor (i.e. lower extremity) and pulvinar thalamus, and striatum; and expanded in the motor thalamus and striatum in patients compared to controls over 2-years. In parallel, myelin-sensitive markers decreased in the thalamus, striatum, and globus pallidus, while iron-sensitive markers decreased within the left caudate. Baseline surface area expansions within the striatum (i.e. motor caudate) predicted better lower extremity motor score at 2-years. Extensive extrapyramidal neurodegenerative and reorganizational changes across the basal ganglia-thalamic circuitry occur early after SCI and progress over time; their magnitude being predictive of functional recovery. These results demonstrate a potential role of extrapyramidal plasticity during functional recovery after SCI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32839540 PMCID: PMC7445170 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70805-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical and epidemiological data for all patients included in the study.
| ID | Age at injury | Initial Site of neurological Impairment (motor/sensory) | INSCSCI upper extremity motor score (Baseline/24-months) | INSCSCI lower extremity motor score (Baseline/24-months) | INSCSCI light-touch score (Baseline/24-months) | INSCSCI pin-prick score (Baseline/24-months) | SCIM score (Baseline/24-months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p1 | 18 | C5/C4 | 19/22 | 0/0 | 24/30 | 27/32 | 4/22 |
| p2 | 23 | C7/C6 | 42/48 | 0/23 | 69/70 | 38/33 | 23/70 |
| p3 | 68 | T10/T10 | 50/50 | 2/31 | 78/74 | 75/65 | 41/46 |
| p4 | 44 | T12/T12 | 50/50 | 39/45 | 107/106 | 109/98 | 84/100 |
| p5 | 42 | C6/C6 | 23/26 | 0/0 | 27/21 | 20/17 | 18/41 |
| p6 | 71 | C7/C8 | 36/48 | 16/42 | 85/66 | 36/25 | 17/43 |
| p7 | 20 | C5/C5 | 21/21 | 0/0 | 21/45 | 19/18 | 4/39 |
| p8 | 30 | C7/C8 | 47/47 | 0/0 | 64/72 | 35/30 | 38/40 |
| p9 | 52 | T9 /T9 | 50/50 | 48/49 | 95/94 | 89/90 | 84/100 |
| p10 | 42 | C5/C4 | 41/36 | 46/48 | 104/99 | 104/96 | 99/100 |
| p11 | 29 | T11/T11 | 50/50 | 10/12 | 86/76 | 88/69 | 52/68 |
| p12 | 71 | T1/T10 | 50/50 | 43/50 | 88/93 | 72/67 | 47/69 |
| p13 | 71 | T1/T4 | 50/50 | 43/50 | 83/112 | 81/112 | 56/97 |
| p14 | 73 | T1/T11 | 50/50 | 0/0 | 75/71 | 77/72 | 28/36 |
| p15 | 31 | C4/C5 | 20/26 | 0/0 | 22/31 | 19/20 | 13/25 |
| p16 | 28 | C4/C3 | 15/10 | 0/0 | 14/23 | 14/23 | 16/20 |
| p17 | 32 | T1/T4 | 50/50 | 9/50 | 79/112 | 58/77 | 40/96 |
INSCSCI International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury; SCIM Spinal Cord Independence Measure.
Figure 1Linear shape differences within the thalamus estimated as surface area contractions and expansions. All surface area contractions (representing degeneration) are represented in blue, and all surface area expansions (reflecting compensatory plasticity) are shown in red. Compared to controls, patients showed contractions of surface area within the inferior part of the ventral anterior and ventral lateral nuclei (motor nuclei) and within the pulvinar nuclei over the first 2-years after spinal cord injury. Surface area expansions were evident in the superior parts of the ventral anterior and ventral lateral nuclei (motor nuclei), as well as within the ventral posterior nuclei (sensory nuclei). Note that the borders of the thalamic subnuclei were identified using the atlas of Chakravarty et al. (2006). Colour bars denote the FDR threshold applied in both the positive (red, expansion) and negative (blue, contraction) directions. Plots B and C denote the surface area measurements across time at peak vertices denoted by the green (B) and yellow (C) markers, illustrating the different group trajectories.
Microstructural changes.
| R1 (s−1) | MT (p.u.) | R2* (s−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean/(95% CI) | p = | (mean/95% CI) | p = p = | (mean/95% CI) | p = | |
| Thalamus | ||||||
| VAN | ||||||
| Left | − 6.527 (− 11.526 to 1.527) | 0.011 | ||||
| VLN | ||||||
| Left | − 6.054 (− 11.018 to 1.089) | 0.017 | ||||
| Right | − 5.156 (− 9.760 to 0.552) | 0.028 | ||||
| VPN | ||||||
| Left | − 5.185 (− 10.214 to 0.157) | 0.043 | ||||
| Striatum | ||||||
| Ventral striatuml | ||||||
| Left | − 0.020 (− 0.039 to 0.001) | 0.047 | ||||
| Right | − 0.017 (− 0.033 to 0.001) | 0.037 | ||||
| Pre-commissural caudate | ||||||
| Left | − 4.598 (− 8.887 to 0.308) | 0.036 | − 0.020 (− 0.038 to 0.003) | 0.021 | ||
| Post-commissural caudate | ||||||
| Left | − 0.001 (− 0.001 to 0.001) | 0.034 | ||||
| Globus pallidus | ||||||
| Left | − 5.570 (− 10.728 to 0.411) | 0.034 | ||||
| Right | − 5.674 (− 10.763 to 0.585) | 0.029 | ||||
| Thalamus | ||||||
| VAN | ||||||
| Left | 0.193 (0.032 0.354) | 0.019 | ||||
| VLN | ||||||
| Left | 0.173 (0.0131 0.333) | 0.034 | ||||
| Right | 0.159 (0.011 0.307) | 0.036 | ||||
| Striatum | ||||||
| Pre-commissural caudate | ||||||
| Left | 0.164 (0.025 0.303) | 0.021 | ||||
| Globus pallidus | ||||||
| Left | 0.178 (0.013 0.343) | 0.034 | ||||
| Right | 0.187 (0.024 0.350) | 0.024 | ||||
Rates of changes of myelin-sensitive R1, MT and R2* in patients compared to controls over time. Negative numbers indicate linear decreases, respectively acceleration, in patients compared to controls, whereas positive values indicate linear increases, respectively deceleration.
Figure 2Linear shape differences within the striatum estimated as surface area contractions and expansions. All surface area contractions (representing degeneration) are represented in blue, and all surface area expansions (reflecting compensatory plasticity) are shown in red. Compared to controls, patients showed contractions of surface area within the putamen, and the caudate, in particular in regions involved in sensorimotor and emotion processing, and in cognitive function over the first 2-years after spinal cord injury. Surface area expansions were evident in regions involved in cognition, emotion and reward processing. Note that the atlas on the right shows the somatotopy of the striatum, based on a review of functional MRI studies (Arsalidou et al. 2013). Labels therefore represent approximate regions of corresponding functions. Colour bars denote the FDR threshold applied in both the positive (red, expansion) and negative (blue, contraction) directions. Plots B and C denote the surface area measurements across time at peak vertices denoted by the green (B) and yellow (C) markers, illustrating the different group trajectories.
Figure 3Relationship between 1-month structural and microstructural parameters and recovery at 2-years. Local morphological features of the striatum (motor region) at 1-month after spinal cord injury were associated with better lower extremity motor score at 2-years, adjusted for age, gender and baseline clinical score. (A) Vertices in red show a relationship of surface area expansions (reflecting compensatory plasticity) with increased lower extremity motor score at 2-years, corrected at 10% FDR. For each of left (B) and right (C) striatum we plot surface area versus change in lower extremity motor score for a given vertex, denoted by green and yellow markers respectively. For the left striatum vertex, correlation was 0.52 (95% CI [− 0.03, 0.83]). For the right striatum, correlation was 0.61 (95% CI [0.096, 0.87]).