Literature DB >> 3283717

Accuracy of ultrasound diagnoses in pregnancies complicated by suspected fetal anomalies.

D K Manchester1, D H Pretorius, C Avery, M L Manco-Johnson, J Wiggins, P R Meier, W H Clewell.   

Abstract

Referral of pregnancies complicated by suspected fetal anomalies to level III perinatal centres for further evaluation and management is increasing as use of real-time ultrasound spreads, but the sensitivity and specificity of the prenatal diagnoses made in this population are unknown. We undertook a prospective study that followed pregnancies referred to a designated programme dealing with suspected fetal abnormalities. Follow-up of 257 pregnancies revealed that 282 separate anomalies were accurately diagnosed in 212 cases. Normal anatomy was correctly predicted in 42 cases, 16 per cent of the referred population. False-positive and false-negative rates were 1.5 per cent (4/257) and 2 per cent (1/46), respectively. However, 37 per cent of those infants born with anomalies had additional problems not prenatally detected by ultrasound. These results indicate that prenatal ultrasound diagnoses are remarkably accurate overall but that they may be insensitive to associated anomalies in individual cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3283717     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970080205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

1.  Examination of fetuses after induced abortion for fetal abnormality.

Authors:  J Clayton-Smith; P A Farndon; C McKeown; D Donnai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-03

Review 2.  Fetal ultrasonography.

Authors:  S H Garmel; M E D'Alton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

3.  Prenatal screening: when and for whom?

Authors:  N A Holtzman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.