Literature DB >> 2146372

Prenatal screening: when and for whom?

N A Holtzman1.   

Abstract

This report discusses the role of prenatal screening in preventing congenital abnormalities or, when prevention is not possible, in avoiding the conception or the birth of those who would have untreatable abnormalities. Women who are found by screening not to be immune to rubella can be safely vaccinated prior to pregnancy; those found to be at risk of having children with genetic disorders such as Tay-Sachs disease or thalassemia have the option of avoiding the conception of affected offspring. Screening during pregnancy permits the primary prevention of Rh disease and its sequelae when it results in the prophylactic administration of Rh-immune globulin to unsensitized Rh-negative women. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening identifies pregnant women who are at increased risk of carrying fetuses with neural tube defects or Down's syndrome, giving them the option of avoiding the birth of affected fetuses through abortion. Recombinant DNA technology will permit screening for many more genetic disorders as the disease-related genes and mutations are identified. For many of these disorders, the ability to predict the risk of disease will antedate preventive and therapeutic interventions by many years. During this lag phase, issues concerning the validity of the tests, the severity of the conditions for which screening is offered, the safety of the interventions, and the autonomy of the pregnant women in deciding to be screened are important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2146372     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

1.  Elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein with normal ultrasound: is amniocentesis always appropriate? A review of 26,069 screened patients.

Authors:  D S Richards; J W Seeds; V L Katz; L H Lingley; S G Albright; R C Cefalo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The impact of MSAFP screening on genetic services, 1984-1986.

Authors:  F Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1988-09

3.  Combining maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein measurements and age to screen for Down syndrome in pregnant women under age 35. New England Regional Genetics Group Prenatal Collaborative Study of Down Syndrome Screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.

Authors:  N J Wald; H S Cuckle; J W Densem; K Nanchahal; P Royston; T Chard; J E Haddow; G J Knight; G E Palomaki; J A Canick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

5.  California's experience with low MS-AFP results.

Authors:  L Lustig; S Clarke; G Cunningham; R Schonberg; G Tompkinson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1988-09

6.  Surgical emergencies after prenatal treatment for intra-abdominal abnormality.

Authors:  S Purkiss; R J Brereton; V M Wright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-02-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Conditional prospective rights of the fetus.

Authors:  M W Shaw
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  1984-03

8.  What participants understand about a maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening program.

Authors:  R R Faden; A J Chwalow; E Orel-Crosby; N A Holtzman; G A Chase; C O Leonard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Eugenics and prenatal testing.

Authors:  R Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.663

10.  A normal ultrasound does not obviate the need for amniocentesis in patients with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein.

Authors:  A Drugan; I E Zador; F N Syner; R J Sokol; A J Sacks; M I Evans
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.