| Literature DB >> 32834560 |
Jianwei Liu1,2, Xinyue Kang1,2, Xueli Liu1,2, Peng Yue1,2, Jianbin Sun1,2, Chen Lu1,2.
Abstract
Biological control of odors and bioaerosols in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have gained more attention in recent years. The simultaneous removal of odors, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and bioaerosols in each unit of a full-scale integrated-reactor (FIR) in a sludge dewatering room was investigated. The average removal efficiencies (REs) of odors, VOCs and bioaerosols were recorded as 98.5 %, 94.7 % and 86.4 %, respectively, at an inlet flow rate of 5760 m3/h. The RE of each unit decreased, and the activated carbon adsorption zone (AZ) played a more important role as the inlet flow rate increased. The REs of hydrophilic compounds were higher than those of hydrophobic compounds. For bioaerosols, roughly 35 % of airborne heterotrophic bacteria (HB) was removed in the low-pH zone (LPZ) while over 30 % of total fungi (TF) was removed in the neutral-pH zone (NPZ). Most bioaerosols removed by the biofilter (BF) had a particle size larger than 4.7 μm while bioaerosols with small particle size were apt to be adsorbed by AZ. The microbial community in the BF changed significantly at different units. Health risks were found to be associated with H2S rather than with bioaerosols at the FIR outlet.Entities:
Keywords: Adsorption; Bioaerosols; Odors; Risk assessment; Two-phase biofilter; VOCs
Year: 2020 PMID: 32834560 PMCID: PMC7341965 DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Process Saf Environ Prot ISSN: 0957-5820 Impact factor: 6.158
Fig. 1The FIR diagram. (1-8) sampling port, (9) suspended zone, (10) low-pH zone, (11) neutral-pH zone, (12) activated carbon adsorption zone, (13) air pump, (14) flowmeter, (15-16) nutrient solution tank, (17) meter pump.
Parameters of FIR.
| Parameters | Two-phase BF | AZ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | IP | |||||
| LPZ | NPZ | |||||
| Length width /m2 | 4.0 × 3.0 | 4.0 × 3.0 | 4.0 × 3.0 | 1.2 × 1.2 | ||
| Effective height /m | 0.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.33 | ||
| Effective volume /m3 | 4.8 | 24 | 24 | 4.8 | ||
| Medium | – | PU | VR | ACF | ||
| Bulk density g/cm3 | – | 0.02 | 2.1 | 0.05 | ||
| Porosity % | – | 65–80 | 50–55 | – | ||
| pH | 7.0–8.0 | 4.0–5.0 | 7.0–8.0 | – | ||
| Moisture content % | – | 40–60 | 40–60 | – | ||
Operation stages of FIR.
| Stage | Time (d) | EBRT (s) | Flow rate (m3/h) | Inlet concentration (mg/m3 or CFU/m3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2S | NH3 | VOCs | HB | TF | ||||
| Ⅰ | 0–37 | 48 | 4320 | 6.14 ± 5.33 | 4.18 ± 2.50 | 4.74 ± 3.51 | 2921 ± 1359 | 1381 ± 531 |
| Ⅱ | 38–127 | 48 | 4320 | 8.86 ± 5.00 | 4.28 ± 2.33 | 5.52 ± 5.28 | 3164 ± 1332 | 1601 ± 509 |
| Ⅲ | 128–217 | 36 | 5760 | 14.46 ± 10.83 | 3.72 ± 2.31 | 7.41 ± 4.96 | 3482 ± 1195 | 1254 ± 533 |
| Ⅳ | 218–307 | 24 | 8640 | 11.38 ± 7.09 | 3.78 ± 2.17 | 7.58 ± 3.27 | 3063 ± 1093 | 1522 ± 562 |
Fig. 2Profiles of inlet concentration (Cin), outlet concentration (Cout) and removal efficiencies (REs) for (a) H2S, (b) NH3.
The REs of odors in different units.
| Stage | Flow rate (m3/h) | Odors | Two-phase BF | AZ % | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP % | IP | ||||||
| LPZ % | NPZ % | ||||||
| Ⅱ | 4320 | H2S | 14.61 ± 1.02 | 69.86 ± 4.53 | 11.90 ± 0.72 | 2.84 ± 0.19 | 99.21 ± 6.46 |
| NH3 | 56.02 ± 3.81 | 22.29 ± 1.34 | 21.27 ± 1.25 | 0 | 99.58 ± 6.40 | ||
| Ⅲ | 5760 | H2S | 12.44 ± 0.83 | 58.34 ± 3.34 | 20.56 ± 1.23 | 7.23 ± 0.31 | 98.57 ± 5.71 |
| NH3 | 51.83 ± 2.60 | 19.45 ± 1.03 | 25.75 ± 1.42 | 2.16 ± 0.11 | 99.19 ± 5.16 | ||
| Ⅳ | 8640 | H2S | 9.87 ± 0.58 | 50.86 ± 3.05 | 16.06 ± 0.97 | 15.82 ± 1.03 | 92.61 ± 5.63 |
| NH3 | 46.69 ± 2.45 | 17.61 ± 0.97 | 20.27 ± 1.38 | 9.75 ± 0.54 | 94.32 ± 5.34 | ||
Fig. 3Profiles of inlet concentration (Cin), outlet concentration (Cout) and removal efficiency (RE) for VOCs.
The REs of VOCs in different units.
| Compounds | Two-phase BF | AZ % | Total % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP % | IP | ||||
| LPZ % | NPZ % | ||||
| Methyl mercaptan | 6.69 ± 0.44 | 60.43 ± 4.62 | 22.62 ± 1.53 | 5.78 ± 0.39 | 95.52 ± 6.98 |
| Dimethyl sulfide | 5.19 ± 0.31 | 61.65 ± 4.68 | 20.28 ± 1.35 | 7.11 ± 0.43 | 94.23 ± 6.77 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 4.95 ± 0.23 | 60.65 ± 3.76 | 21.54 ± 1.24 | 6.54 ± 0.35 | 93.68 ± 5.58 |
| Acetic acid | 30.56 ± 1.96 | 7.92 ± 0.55 | 61.19 ± 4.21 | 0 | 99.67 ± 6.72 |
| Acetone | 23.63 ± 1.71 | 7.50 ± 0.48 | 67.38 ± 4.35 | 0 | 98.51 ± 6.54 |
| 2-Butanone | 17.41 ± 1.22 | 24.33 ± 1.46 | 49.46 ± 3.44 | 3.63 ± 0.17 | 94.83 ± 6.29 |
| 2.93 ± 0.17 | 59.59 ± 3.74 | 17.34 ± 1.23 | 13.48 ± 1.01 | 93.34 ± 6.15 | |
| Ethylbenzene | 3.94 ± 0.21 | 64.09 ± 3.60 | 12.88 ± 0.69 | 11.65 ± 0.67 | 92.55 ± 5.17 |
| Styrene | 3.12 ± 0.18 | 63.46 ± 3.81 | 15.81 ± 1.14 | 10.77 ± 0.79 | 93.16 ± 5.92 |
| Methanol | 25.12 ± 1.47 | 15.87 ± 1.24 | 58.18 ± 3.90 | 0 | 99.17 ± 6.61 |
| Benzene | 2.75 ± 0.15 | 65.53 ± 3.97 | 17.58 ± 1.21 | 8.73 ± 0.54 | 94.59 ± 5.87 |
| 2.14 ± 0.12 | 66.85 ± 4.03 | 12.17 ± 0.81 | 12.32 ± 0.99 | 93.48 ± 5.95 | |
| 1.92 ± 0.13 | 68.37 ± 4.07 | 10.61 ± 0.72 | 11.57 ± 0.76 | 92.47 ± 5.68 | |
| Ethyl Acetate | 27.60 ± 1.58 | 11.67 ± 0.77 | 57.92 ± 3.85 | 2.29 ± 0.13 | 99.48 ± 6.33 |
| Butyl Acetate | 23.44 ± 1.35 | 8.21 ± 0.52 | 63.32 ± 4.03 | 3.68 ± 0.25 | 98.65 ± 6.15 |
| Cyclohexanone | 3.72 ± 0.17 | 70.47 ± 3.83 | 13.72 ± 0.73 | 4.20 ± 0.21 | 92.11 ± 4.94 |
Fig. 4Profiles of inlet concentration (Cin), outlet concentration (Cout) and removal efficiencies (RE) for (a) HB, (b) TF.
Fig. 5Bioaerosols emitted or retained during operation (a) HB, (b) TF.
The REs of bioaerosols in different units.
| Stage | Flow rate (m3/h) | Bioaerosols | Two-phase BF | AZ % | Total % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP % | IP | ||||||
| LPZ % | NPZ % | ||||||
| Ⅱ | 4320 | HB | 9.12 ± 0.82 | 37.05 ± 2.83 | 20.76 ± 1.34 | 23.84 ± 1.81 | 90.77 ± 6.35 |
| TF | 18.33 ± 1.42 | 13.40 ± 1.35 | 36.37 ± 2.31 | 27.76 ± 2.04 | 95.86 ± 3.89 | ||
| Ⅲ | 5760 | HB | 7.96 ± 0.62 | 35.80 ± 2.76 | 19.33 ± 1.35 | 22.64 ± 1.67 | 85.73 ± 7.34 |
| TF | 18.07 ± 1.20 | 12.34 ± 1.37 | 35.15 ± 2.06 | 26.34 ± 1.98 | 91.90 ± 4.89 | ||
| Ⅳ | 8640 | HB | 6.74 ± 0.52 | 33.40 ± 2.43 | 17.25 ± 1.18 | 21.95 ± 1.55 | 79.34 ± 7.38 |
| TF | 17.35 ± 1.29 | 10.38 ± 0.88 | 33.73 ± 2.14 | 24.28 ± 1.76 | 85.74 ± 6.49 | ||
Fig. 6Particle size distributions in each sample port of airborne (a) HB and (b) TF.
Fig. 7Microorganisms in different units (a) suspended phase (b) low-pH zone (c) neutral-pH zone.
HQ and RfC of different contaminants.
| Site | H2S | NH3 | Benzene | EBZ | Xylenes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RfC (mg/m3) | – | 2 × 10−3 | 0.5 | 3 × 10−2 | 1 | 0.1 |
| HQ | 0m | 2.40 × 10−2 | 2.47 × 10−2 | 1.04 × 10−3 | 4.07 × 10−2 | |
| 50m | 7.77 × 10−3 | 2.40 × 10−6 | 2.52 × 10−6 | 1.05 × 10−7 | 4.14 × 10−6 | |
| 100m | 4.07 × 10−3 | 1.21 × 10−6 | 1.27 × 10−6 | 5.34 × 10−8 | 2.10 × 10−6 |
EBZ: ethylbenzene.