Literature DB >> 12895561

Adsorption of volatile organic compounds by pecan shell- and almond shell-based granular activated carbons.

R R Bansode1, J N Losso, W E Marshall, R M Rao, R J Portier.   

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine the effectiveness of using pecan and almond shell-based granular activated carbons (GACs) in the adsorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of health concern and known toxic compounds (such as bromo-dichloromethane, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloromethane, chloroform, and 1,1-dichloromethane) compared to the adsorption efficiency of commercially used carbons (such as Filtrasorb 200, Calgon GRC-20, and Waterlinks 206C AW) in simulated test medium. The pecan shell-based GACs were activated using steam, carbon dioxide or phosphoric acid. An almond shell-based GAC was activated with phosphoric acid. Our results indicated that steam- or carbon dioxide-activated pecan shell carbons were superior in total VOC adsorption to phosphoric acid-activated pecan shell or almond shell carbons, inferring that the method of activation selected for the preparation of activated carbons affected the adsorption of VOCs and hence are factors to be considered in any adsorption process. The steam-activated, pecan shell carbon adsorbed more total VOCs than the other experimental carbons and had an adsorption profile similar to the two coconut shell-based commercial carbons, but had greater adsorption than the coal-based commercial carbon. All the carbons studied adsorbed benzene more effectively than the other organics. Pecan shell, steam-activated and acid-activated GACs showed higher adsorption of 1,1,1-trichloroethane than the other carbons studied. Multivariate analysis was conducted to group experimental carbons and commercial carbons based on their physical, chemical, and adsorptive properties. The results of the analysis conclude that steam-activated and acid-activated pecan shell carbons clustered together with coal-based and coconut shell-based commercial carbons, thus inferring that these experimental carbons could potentially be used as alternative sources for VOC adsorption in an aqueous environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12895561     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00117-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  4 in total

1.  Mesoporous graphene adsorbents for the removal of toluene and xylene at various concentrations and its reusability.

Authors:  Sun Taek Lim; Ji Hoon Kim; Chang Yeon Lee; Sangmo Koo; Dong-Wook Jerng; Somchai Wongwises; Ho Seon Ahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The Effect of an Adsorbent Matrix on Recovery of Microorganisms from Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Groundwater.

Authors:  Nicole M Taylor; Courtney R A Toth; Victoria Collins; Paolo Mussone; Lisa M Gieg
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  From grass to battery anode: agricultural biomass hemp-derived carbon for lithium storage.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Um; Chi-Yeong Ahn; Jinsoo Kim; Mihee Jeong; Yung-Eun Sung; Yong-Hun Cho; Seung-Soo Kim; Won-Sub Yoon
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Simultaneous removal of bioaerosols, odors and volatile organic compounds from a wastewater treatment plant by a full-scale integrated reactor.

Authors:  Jianwei Liu; Xinyue Kang; Xueli Liu; Peng Yue; Jianbin Sun; Chen Lu
Journal:  Process Saf Environ Prot       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 6.158

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.