Literature DB >> 32833533

Promoter Orientation within an AAV-CRISPR Vector Affects Cas9 Expression and Gene Editing Efficiency.

Lewis E Fry1,2, Caroline F Peddle1, Marta Stevanovic1, Alun R Barnard1,2, Michelle E McClements1, Robert E MacLaren1,2.   

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have been widely adopted for delivery of CRISPR-Cas components, especially for therapeutic gene editing. For a single vector system, both the Cas9 and guide RNA (gRNA) are encoded within a single transgene, usually from separate promoters. Careful design of this bi-cistronic construct is required due to the minimal packaging capacity of AAV. We investigated how placement of the U6 promoter expressing the gRNA on the reverse strand to SaCas9 driven by a cytomegalovirus promoter affected gene editing rates compared to placement on the forward strand. We show that orientation in the reverse direction reduces editing rates from an AAV vector due to reduced transcription of both SaCas9 and guide RNA. This effect was observed only following AAV transduction; it was not seen following plasmid transfection. These results have implications for the design of AAV-CRISPR vectors, and suggest that results from optimizing plasmid transgenes may not translate when delivered via AAV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32833533      PMCID: PMC7469699          DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2020.0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CRISPR J        ISSN: 2573-1599


  38 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  The dynamic response of upstream DNA to transcription-generated torsional stress.

Authors:  Fedor Kouzine; Juhong Liu; Suzanne Sanford; Hye-Jung Chung; David Levens
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2004-10-24       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Extrachromosomal recombinant adeno-associated virus vector genomes are primarily responsible for stable liver transduction in vivo.

Authors:  H Nakai; S R Yant; T A Storm; S Fuess; L Meuse; M A Kay
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  AAV-Mediated CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing of Retinal Cells In Vivo.

Authors:  Sandy S C Hung; Vicki Chrysostomou; Fan Li; Jeremiah K H Lim; Jiang-Hui Wang; Joseph E Powell; Leilei Tu; Maciej Daniszewski; Camden Lo; Raymond C Wong; Jonathan G Crowston; Alice Pébay; Anna E King; Bang V Bui; Guei-Sheung Liu; Alex W Hewitt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A Self-Deleting AAV-CRISPR System for In Vivo Genome Editing.

Authors:  Ang Li; Ciaran M Lee; Ayrea E Hurley; Kelsey E Jarrett; Marco De Giorgi; Weiqi Lu; Karol S Balderrama; Alexandria M Doerfler; Harshavardhan Deshmukh; Anirban Ray; Gang Bao; William R Lagor
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 6.698

7.  Cytosine and adenine base editing of the brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal muscle of mice via adeno-associated viruses.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levy; Wei-Hsi Yeh; Nachiket Pendse; Jessie R Davis; Erin Hennessey; Rossano Butcher; Luke W Koblan; Jason Comander; Qin Liu; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  An AAV Dual Vector Strategy Ameliorates the Stargardt Phenotype in Adult Abca4-/- Mice.

Authors:  Michelle E McClements; Alun R Barnard; Mandeep S Singh; Peter Charbel Issa; Zhichun Jiang; Roxana A Radu; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 5.695

9.  A dual AAV system enables the Cas9-mediated correction of a metabolic liver disease in newborn mice.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Lili Wang; Peter Bell; Deirdre McMenamin; Zhenning He; John White; Hongwei Yu; Chenyu Xu; Hiroki Morizono; Kiran Musunuru; Mark L Batshaw; James M Wilson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition.

Authors:  Eva K Brinkman; Tao Chen; Mario Amendola; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adenine Base Editing In Vivo with a Single Adeno-Associated Virus Vector.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Nathan Bamidele; Pengpeng Liu; Ogooluwa Ojelabi; Xin D Gao; Tomás Rodriguez; Haoyang Cheng; Karen Kelly; Jonathan K Watts; Jun Xie; Guangping Gao; Scot A Wolfe; Wen Xue; Erik J Sontheimer
Journal:  GEN Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.