Literature DB >> 32832698

The Real-World Lifetime Economic Burden of Urothelial Carcinoma by Stage at Diagnosis.

Abdalla Aly1, Courtney Johnson2, Yunes Doleh1, Viktor Chirikov2, Marc Botteman2, Rahul Shenolikar1, Arif Hussain3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is generally diagnosed early and may incur significant lifetime costs. This study estimated, from the payer's perspective, the lifetime costs among patients diagnosed with UC according to stage at diagnosis.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database identified patients ≥66 years with newly diagnosed UC from 2004-2013. Patients were followed from UC diagnosis to death or last follow-up to estimate lifetime costs. Costs were allocated to 3 phases: diagnosis (≤3 months after diagnosis), terminal (≤3 months before death), and continuation (months between diagnosis and terminal phases). Survival-adjusted lifetime costs (total and major UC-related) were estimated for patients with UC based on stage at diagnosis (stages 0 through IV) and in a subgroup of patients receiving ≥1 systemic line of chemotherapy (LOC).
RESULTS: The sample included 15,588 patients: 3,446 stage 0 (8% ≥1 LOC; median [IQR] follow-up in months: 44 [23-71]); 3,902 stage I (12% ≥1 LOC; 33 [15-62]); 4,301 stage II (26% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-39]); 1,612 stage III (25% ≥1 LOC; 17 [7-42]); and 2,327 stage IV (33% ≥1 LOC; 8 [3-18]). Median age was 78 years and 72% were male. Mean lifetime costs were lowest for stage IV patients (stage 0, $151,626; stage 1, $150,123; stage II, $149,728; stage III, $190,996; stage IV, $117,503). Hospitalizations not involving a cystectomy contributed about half of lifetime costs across all stages. Cystectomy contributed 2-13% of the total lifetime UC costs ($3,356 stage 0; $7,011 stage I; $11,855 stage II; $25,509 stage III; $11,693 stage IV). UC-related office visits contributed 8-15% of lifetime costs ($11,717 stage 0; $14,611 stage I; $19,882 stage II; $21,480 stage III; $17,820 stage IV).
CONCLUSION: UC continues to be a costly cancer with stage III patients having highest lifetime costs. Hospitalizations drive most of the lifetime costs across all stages; most of these hospitalizations did not involve costs related to cystectomy. Treatment plans requiring shorter and fewer hospitalizations may lessen the economic burden of UC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunotherapy; SEER-Medicare; administrative claims; bladder cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32832698      PMCID: PMC7433100     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathw        ISSN: 2380-9604


  31 in total

1.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  The economics of bladder cancer: costs and considerations of caring for this disease.

Authors:  Robert S Svatek; Brent K Hollenbeck; Sten Holmäng; Richard Lee; Simon P Kim; Arnulf Stenzl; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database.

Authors:  A L Potosky; G F Riley; J D Lubitz; R M Mentnech; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Elizabeth B Lamont; Angela Mariotto; Joan L Warren; Marie Topor; Angela Meekins; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  The health economics of bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the published literature.

Authors:  Marc F Botteman; Chris L Pashos; Alberto Redaelli; Benjamin Laskin; Robert Hauser
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Financial Toxicity among Patients with Bladder Cancer: Reasons for Delay in Care and Effect on Quality of Life.

Authors:  Marianne M Casilla-Lennon; Seul Ki Choi; Allison M Deal; Jeannette T Bensen; Gopal Narang; Pauline Filippou; Benjamin McCormick; Raj Pruthi; Eric Wallen; Hung-Jui Tan; Michael Woods; Matthew Nielsen; Angela Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Techniques for estimating health care costs with censored data: an overview for the health services researcher.

Authors:  Harindra C Wijeysundera; Xuesong Wang; George Tomlinson; Dennis T Ko; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 8.  Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs?

Authors:  K D Sievert; B Amend; U Nagele; D Schilling; J Bedke; M Horstmann; J Hennenlotter; S Kruck; A Stenzl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Phase-specific and lifetime costs of cancer care in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Claire de Oliveira; Reka Pataky; Karen E Bremner; Jagadish Rangrej; Kelvin K W Chan; Winson Y Cheung; Jeffrey S Hoch; Stuart Peacock; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Urothelial carcinoma: the evolving landscape of immunotherapy for patients with advanced disease.

Authors:  Brian Dietrich; Sandy Srinivas
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-01-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  A population-based comparison of treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Brezden-Masley; Kelly E Fathers; Megan E Coombes; Behin Pourmirza; Cloris Xue; Katarzyna J Jerzak
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Tyro3 Targeting as a Radiosensitizing Strategy in Bladder Cancer through Cell Cycle Dysregulation.

Authors:  Linda Silina; Florent Dufour; Audrey Rapinat; Cécile Reyes; David Gentien; Fatlinda Maksut; François Radvanyi; Pierre Verrelle; Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot; Frédérique Mégnin-Chanet
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  A population-based comparison of treatment, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Brezden-Masley; Kelly E Fathers; Megan E Coombes; Behin Pourmirza; Cloris Xue; Katarzyna J Jerzak
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.