Literature DB >> 32831965

Clinical Impact of F-18 FDG PET-CT on Biopsy Site Selection in Patients with Suspected Bone Metastasis of Unknown Primary Site.

Su Woong Yoo1, Md Sunny Anam Chowdhury1,2, Subin Jeon1, Sae-Ryung Kang1, Changho Lee1,3, Zeenat Jabin1,4, Jahae Kim5, Sang-Geon Cho5, Ho-Chun Song3,5, Hee-Seung Bom1,3, Jung-Joon Min1,3, Seong Young Kwon1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the clinical role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in the identification of the primary site and the selection of the optimal biopsy site in patients with suspected bone metastasis of unknown primary site.
METHODS: The patients with suspected bone metastasis who underwent PET-CT for evaluation of primary site were enrolled in this study. The primary sites were identified by the histopathologic or imaging studies and were classified according to the FDG uptake positivity of the primary site. To evaluate the guiding capability of PET-CT in biopsy site selection, we statistically analyzed whether the biopsy site could be affected according to the presence of extra-skeletal FDG uptake.
RESULTS: Among 74 enrolled patients, 51 patients had a metastatic bone disease. The primary site was identified in 48 of 51 patients (94.1%). Forty-six patients were eligible to test the association of clinical choice of biopsy site with PET positivity of extra-skeletal lesion. The extra-skeletal biopsies were done in 42 out of 43 patients with positive extra-skeletal uptake lesions. Bone biopsies were inevitably performed in the other three patients without extra-skeletal uptake lesions. The association came out to be significant (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: F-18 FDG PET-CT significantly contributed not only to identify the primary site but also to suggest optimal biopsy sites in patients with suspected bone metastasis. © Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Bone metastasis; PET-CT; Unknown primary site

Year:  2020        PMID: 32831965      PMCID: PMC7429616          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-020-00649-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  28 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults.

Authors:  John F Cardella; Curtis W Bakal; Raymond E Bertino; Dana R Burke; Alain Drooz; Ziv Haskal; Curtis A Lewis; Patrick C Malloy; Steven G Meranze; Steven B Oglevie; David Sacks; Richard B Towbin
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal neoplasms: biopsy and intervention.

Authors:  Ambrose J Huang; Susan V Kattapuram
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Molecular positron emission tomography and PET/CT imaging in urological malignancies.

Authors:  Tom Powles; Iain Murray; Cathryn Brock; Tim Oliver; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  PET Molecular Imaging-Directed Biopsy: A Review.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; David M Schuster
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Harry Agress; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Metastatic prostate cancer: initial findings of PET with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose.

Authors:  P D Shreve; H B Grossman; M D Gross; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MRI-targeted biopsy versus standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xu Hu; Zhi-Qiang Yang; Yan-Xiang Shao; Wei-Chao Dou; San-Chao Xiong; Wei-Xiao Yang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10

8.  Practical Guidelines for Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Soft-Tissue Lesions: Transformation from Beginner to Specialist.

Authors:  Sang Yoon Kim; Hye Won Chung; Tack Sun Oh; Jong-Seok Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  The impact of infection and inflammation in oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  W Tania Rahman; Daniel J Wale; Benjamin L Viglianti; Danyelle M Townsend; Matthew S Manganaro; Milton D Gross; Ka Kit Wong; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 10.  How We Read Oncologic FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Michael S Hofman; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.909

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Multimodal Imaging-Based Potential Visualization of the Tumor Microenvironment in Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Jang Bae Moon; Su Woong Yoo; Changho Lee; Dong-Yeon Kim; Ayoung Pyo; Seong Young Kwon
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 6.600

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.