Literature DB >> 31897680

MRI-targeted biopsy versus standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xu Hu1, Zhi-Qiang Yang1, Yan-Xiang Shao1, Wei-Chao Dou1, San-Chao Xiong1, Wei-Xiao Yang1, Xiang Li2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For men with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), the transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx) was recommended. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) could be more useful to more accurately selected patients who are with a clinical suspicion of PCa and eligible for biopsy, and avoid a biopsy if the result was negative. In the present study, we compared the MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) with TRUS-Bx.
METHODS: We searched the following online database: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and the search was updated to March 2019.
RESULTS: Finally, a total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 2593 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. MRI-TBx and TRUS-Bx did not significantly differ in overall PCa (RR = 1.30; 95% CI 0.98-1.72; P = 0.067), clinically significant PCa (RR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.98-1.86; P = 0.065), and clinically insignificant PCa (RR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.40-1.46; P = 0.416). While in patients with initial biopsy, MRI-TBx had a significantly higher detection rate of overall PCa (RR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.01-1.94; P = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: In the present study, we found that MRI-TBx potentially benefits the detection of overall and clinically significant PCa compared with TRUS-Bx in patients with a suspicion of PCa. Furthermore, in patients with initial biopsy, MRI-TBx had a significantly higher detection rate of overall PCa and a potentially higher detection rate of clinically significant PCa. While for patients with prior negative biopsy, we did not detect significant differences in overall and clinically significant PCa between two groups. More large and multicenter RCTs are further required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Meta-analysis; Prostate biopsy; Randomized controlled study; Transrectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31897680     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02370-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  1 in total

1.  Clinical Impact of F-18 FDG PET-CT on Biopsy Site Selection in Patients with Suspected Bone Metastasis of Unknown Primary Site.

Authors:  Su Woong Yoo; Md Sunny Anam Chowdhury; Subin Jeon; Sae-Ryung Kang; Changho Lee; Zeenat Jabin; Jahae Kim; Sang-Geon Cho; Ho-Chun Song; Hee-Seung Bom; Jung-Joon Min; Seong Young Kwon
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.