Literature DB >> 32831814

Optimization of multi-pathway production chains and multi-criteria decision-making through sustainability evaluation: a biojet fuel production case study.

Eduardo Vyhmeister1, Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado2, Ana I Torres3, John A Posada4.   

Abstract

Selection of optimal technologies for novel biobased products and processes is a major challenge in process design, especially when are considered many alternatives available to transform materials into valuable products. Furthermore, such technological alternatives vary in their technical performances and cause different levels of economic and environmental impacts throughout their life cycles. Additionally, selection of optimal production pathways requires a shift from the traditional materials management practices to more sustainable practices. This contribution provides a method for optimizing multi-product network systems from a sustainability perspective by applying the GREENSCOPE framework as a sustainable objective function. A case study is presented in which the four GREENSCOPE target areas (i.e., efficiency, energy, economics, and environment) are evaluated by 21 preselected indicators as part of a multi-objective optimization problem of a biojet fuel production network. The biojet fuel production network evaluated in this study consists of four main elements: (1) feedstocks management, (2) conversion technologies, (3) co-products upgrading, and (4) auxiliary sections for in situ production of raw materials and utilities. For the sustainability objective function, the 21 indicators are analyzed considering multiple perspectives of stakeholders to study their influence on the decision-making process. It is, different sets of weighting factors are assigned to each of the four target areas. Hence, this sustainability evaluation from different stakeholders' perspectives allows identifying optimal networks, specific target areas with great potential for improvements, and processing steps with great influence in the entire network performance. As a result, diverse optimal network arrangements were obtained according to the multiple stakeholders' perspectives. This evidences that a win-win situation for all sustainability aspects considered can hardly be reached. Finally, this contribution demonstrated the applicability of the proposed methodology for sustainability evaluation, optimization, and decision-making in the context of a multi-product material facility by developing a multi-objective optimization model.

Keywords:  Biojet fuel biorefinery; Materials management; Multi-criteria decision-making; Multi-objective optimization; Multi-stakeholder analysis; Sustainability assessment

Year:  2018        PMID: 32831814      PMCID: PMC7433847          DOI: 10.1007/s10098-018-1576-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy        ISSN: 1618-954X            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Fast pyrolysis of palm kernel shells: influence of operation parameters on the bio-oil yield and the yield of phenol and phenolic compounds.

Authors:  Seon-Jin Kim; Su-Hwa Jung; Joo-Sik Kim
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 2.  Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering.

Authors:  George W Huber; Sara Iborra; Avelino Corma
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Coupling Computer-Aided Process Simulation and Estimations of Emissions and Land Use for Rapid Life Cycle Inventory Modeling.

Authors:  Raymond L Smith; Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado; David E Meyer; Michael A Gonzalez; John P Abraham; William M Barrett; Paul M Randall
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 8.198

4.  Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum.

Authors:  Hazel V Rowley; Gregory M Peters; Sven Lundie; Stephen J Moore
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Integrating Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment with Multiobjective Optimization: A Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Dajun Yue; Shyama Pandya; Fengqi You
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Mining Available Data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency to Support Rapid Life Cycle Inventory Modeling of Chemical Manufacturing.

Authors:  Sarah A Cashman; David E Meyer; Ashley N Edelen; Wesley W Ingwersen; John P Abraham; William M Barrett; Michael A Gonzalez; Paul M Randall; Gerardo Ruiz-Mercado; Raymond L Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Techno-economic comparison of biojet fuel production from lignocellulose, vegetable oil and sugar cane juice.

Authors:  Gabriel Wilhelm Diederichs; Mohsen Ali Mandegari; Somayeh Farzad; Johann F Görgens
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 9.642

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition.

Authors:  Jan R Starke; Tamara A P Metze; Jeroen J L Candel; Catrien J A M Termeer
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.943

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.