Literature DB >> 32830857

Bioinformatics analysis of prognostic value of PITX1 gene in breast cancer.

Qiaoyun Wang1,2, Shuai Zhao3, Lei Gan1, Zhixiang Zhuang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 1 (PITX1) participates in miscellaneous biological processes including cell growth, development, progression and invasion in various malignant tumors. However, the analysis of the association between PITX1 expression and the survival in breast cancer remains unclear.
METHODS: Clinical prognostic parameters and survival data related to PITX1 in breast cancer patients were performed using the bioinformatic analysis including Oncomine, Bc-GenExMiner v4.3, PrognoScan and UCSC Xena.
RESULTS: We found that PITX1 gene expression was significantly higher in different histological classification of breast cancer. The Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade, Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), estrogen receptor (ER) negative, epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive, lymph node positive, triple-negative status and basal-like status were positively correlated with PITX1 level, except for patients' age and the progesterone receptor (PR) status. We have found that the increased PITX1 expression correlated with worse relapse-free survival, disease specific survival and overall survival. PITX1 was positively correlated with metastatic relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival. We also confirmed positive correlation between PITX1 and the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2).
CONCLUSION: The lower expression of PITX1 was associated with better clinical prognostic parameters and clinical survival in breast cancer according to the bioinformatic analysis.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  PITX1; bioinformation; breast cancer; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32830857      PMCID: PMC7494990          DOI: 10.1042/BSR20202537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosci Rep        ISSN: 0144-8463            Impact factor:   3.840


Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women and the primary cause of female cancer death worldwide [1]. Although the application of locoregional surgery, conventional chemotherapy, precision radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and monoclonal antibody has significant benefits for the prognosis of breast cancer patients, still lots of patients were subjected to the threaten of recurrence and death. Prognosis prediction of breast cancer is related to clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics [2]. Therefore, the identification of new prognostic markers can provide new insight to early detection of breast cancer and decrease the mortality and recurrence. Paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 1 (PITX1) participates in cell growth and development. It was considered as a binary transcription factor involved in the transcription of proopiomelanocortin gene, which may play a role in the differentiation and formation of pituitary cells [3]. In addition, the role of PITX1 in the development of the hind limbs is mainly found in the areas such as cartilage joints, long bones and skeletal muscles [4]. Haploid deficiency of mice and human PITX1 can lead to talipes equinovarus [5]. Therefore, PITX1 was identified as the key role of the hind limb development. PITX1 is down-regulated as a tumor suppressor in various malignant tumors and correlated with poor prognosis in gastric carcinoma [6], lung carcinoma [7], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [8], colorectal carcinoma [9], hepatic carcinoma [10], cutaneous malignant melanoma [11], osteosarcoma [12] and clear cell renal cell carcinoma [13]. PITX1 promotes the expression of RAS negative regulators as a transcription factor [14]. The tumorigenic effect of PITX1 gene was achieved by some signaling pathways, such as EMT and WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway that have a positive regulatory effect on proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer [15], while it was related to KRAS, WNT, NF-κB activation pathway and TGF-β signaling pathway in colon cancer [16]. The important role of PITX1 in the development of malignant tumor can be observed from cancer development, differential expression in cancer and related molecular mechanisms. However, the analysis of PITX1 in breast cancer is rare and the association between PITX1 expression and breast cancer patients’ survival remains unknown. The present study assessed the correlation between PITX1 expression and the prognostic factor of breast cancer by using various online analysis databases to explore the prognostic significance of PITX1 gene in the treatment of breast cancer.

Methods and materials

Oncomine

Oncomine (http://www.oncomine.org), a cancer microarray database and web-based data mining platform, aims to compare the transcriptome data with normal tissues in most major types of cancer [17]. The gene expression level of PITX1 was analyzed by Oncomine. We compared mRNA level of PITX1 for each microarray data between tissue of normal individual and breast cancer patients with designed parameters including 2-fold change, P value ≤ 1E-4 and top 10% gene rank. T-test was used to analyze the expression difference between different breast cancer pathological types and normal tissues in datasets of PITX1 gene overexpression. In addition, the co-expression gene of PITX1 was analyzed concurrently.

Breast cancer gene-expression miner v4.3 (Bc-GenExMiner v4.3)

Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 (http://bcgenex.centregauducheau.fr/BC-GEM/GEM-Accueil.php?js=1) was analyzed from 36 annotated genomic datasets and three statistical mining functions. Open access database for Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 to analyze the relationship between the expression level of breast cancer specific mRNA level of PITX1 gene and the specific clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer (including age, Scarff–Bloom–Richardson (SBR) grade, Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), nodal status, triple-negative status and basal-like status). Survival analysis was exerted with the software. Moreover, the relationship between co-expression genes of PITX1 was analyzed with the database. Data last updated in July 2019.

PrognoScan

PrognoScan (http://dna00.bio.kyutech.ac.jp/PrognoScan/index.html) is the microarray database of the biological relationship between gene expression and clinical prognosis in various cancers [18]. We utilized PrognoScan database to verify the correlation between mRNA level of PITX1 expression and survival with the adjusted cox P value < 0.05 in breast cancer.

UCSC xena

UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/) is a genome-related database including many tumor research database functions, providing visual analysis for public data centers. Heat map of co-expression gene can be analyzed in the data mining of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) by UCSC Xena browser.

Results

Overexpression of PITX1 gene in breast cancer patients

The expression of PITX1 gene compared with normal individuals and breast cancer patients was detected in 20 kinds of common cancers with tumor online database Oncomine. Up-regulation of PITX1 gene expression was found in breast cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer and lymphoma, while down-regulation of PITX1 gene expression being detected in bladder cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer and head and neck cancer. Four out of ten meet the threshold, which are the 11 datasets of overexpression of PITX1 gene level from a total number of 43 breast cancer datasets (Figure 1). Compared with normal individuals, the level of PITX1 gene expression was significantly higher in invasive breast carcinoma, invasive ductal breast carcinoma, invasive lobular breast carcinoma, ductal breast carcinoma, medullary breast carcinoma, invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast carcinoma and tubular breast carcinoma (Figure 2A–K, P=9.96E-28, 3.35E-42, 2.88E-13, 1.18E-7, 2.70E-9, 2.49E-1.4, 1.85E-30, 1.60E-39, 1.48E-76, 1.41E-5 and 3.43E-1.4). In the eleven datasets, three datasets of invasive breast carcinoma appears to be the same trend (Figure 2A, P=9.96E-28, Figure 2D, 1.18E-7, Figure 2J, 1.41E-5, Table 1), while two datasets of invasive ductal breast carcinoma (Figure 2B, 3.35E-4, Figure 2I, 1.48E-76, Table 1) and two datasets of invasive lobular breast carcinoma are the same (Figure 2C, 2.88E-13, Figure 2H, 1.60E-39, Table 1).
Figure 1

Expression of PITX1 gene in 20 common tumors compared with paired normal tissues

Oncomine database was designed with fold change ≥ 2, P value ≤ 1E-4 and gene rank ≥ top 10%. The graphic represents the numbers of datasets with statistically significant (P<0.01) mRNA over-expression (red) or down-expression (blue) of PITX1 (different types of cancer vs. corresponding normal tissue).

Figure 2

Box plots of normal and tumor differentially expression of PITX1 gene in different subtypes of breast cancer

(A) Invasive Breast Carcinoma, (B) Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma, (C) Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, (D) Invasive Breast Carcinoma, (E) Ductal Breast Carcinoma, (F) Medullary Breast Carcinoma, (G) Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, (H) Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, (I) Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma, (J) Invasive Breast Carcinoma and (K) Tubular Breast Carcinoma.

Table 1

Different datasets to analyze PITX1 gene expression in pathological classification of breast cancer

Breast cancer subtypeP valueT testFold changeSample
Invasive Breast Carcinoma9.96E-2814.0464.283137
Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma3.35E-4219.7774.017450
Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma2.88E-139.5833.58697
Invasive Breast Carcinoma1.81E-710.3512.334158
Ductal Breast Carcinoma2.70E-97.4315.78747
Medullary Breast Carcinoma2.49E-1411.3696.934176
Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma1.85E-3014.7876.474234
Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma1.60E-3915.8245.821292
Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma1.48E-7629.1686.4921700
Invasive Breast Carcinoma1.41E-55.2764.635165
Tubular Breast Carcinoma3.43E-148.7743.373211

Expression of PITX1 gene in 20 common tumors compared with paired normal tissues

Oncomine database was designed with fold change ≥ 2, P value ≤ 1E-4 and gene rank ≥ top 10%. The graphic represents the numbers of datasets with statistically significant (P<0.01) mRNA over-expression (red) or down-expression (blue) of PITX1 (different types of cancer vs. corresponding normal tissue).

Box plots of normal and tumor differentially expression of PITX1 gene in different subtypes of breast cancer

(A) Invasive Breast Carcinoma, (B) Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma, (C) Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, (D) Invasive Breast Carcinoma, (E) Ductal Breast Carcinoma, (F) Medullary Breast Carcinoma, (G) Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, (H) Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, (I) Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma, (J) Invasive Breast Carcinoma and (K) Tubular Breast Carcinoma.

PITX1 gene expression with different clinical parameters in breast cancer

Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 software was used to evaluate the expression of PITX1 gene with several clinical parameters in breast cancer patients. There was no significant difference of PITX1 expression between the <51-year-old group and the >51-year-old group (Figure 3A, P=0.3119, Table 2). The Scarff–Bloom–Richardson grading system (SBR Grade) is the histological grade which based on tumor size (<2 cm, 2–5 cm, ≥5 cm), lymph node status (positive or negative) and vascular invasion status (positive or negative) in breast cancer [19]. The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) is based on histopathological factors (tumor size, lymph node stage and tumor grade) [20]. The expression of PITX1 gene was higher with advanced SBR grade and NPI of breast cancer patients (Figure 3B, P<0.0001, Figure 3C, P<0.0001). The expression of PITX1 gene was higher in ER negative breast cancer patients (Figure 3D, P<0.0001, Table 2). There was no significant difference between the PR positive and PR negative groups (Figure 3E, P=0.1186, Table 2). The expression of PITX1 gene was higher in HER2 positive breast cancer patients (Figure 3F, P=0.0188, Table 2). Compared with lymph node negative patients, the expression of PITX1 gene in lymph node positive patients increased (Figure 3G, P<0.0001, Table 2). In addition, PITX1 was significantly higher in triple negative and basal breast cancer patients than in non-triple negative and non-basal breast cancer patients (Figure 3H, P=0.013, Figure 3I, P<0.0001, Table 2).
Figure 3

Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 to evaluate PITX1 gene expression with box plots according to clinical parameters in breast cancer patients

(A) Age, (B) SBR grade, (C) NPI, (D) ER, (E) PR, (F) HER-2, (G) nodal status, (H) triple-negative status and (I) basal-like status.

Table 2

PITX1 gene expression analysis in different clinical parameters of breast cancer with Bc-GenExMiner v4.3

VariablesNo. of patientsPITX1 mRNAP value*
Age0.3119
≤512730
>514605
ER<0.0001
Negative2366Increased
Positive6534
PR0.1186
Negative1559
Positive2159
HER-20.0188
Negative2389
Positive438Increased
Nodal status<0.0001
Negative4150
Positive3225Increased
Triple-negative status0.0013
Non-triple-negative6834
Triple-negative573Increased
Basal-like status<0.0001
Non-basal-like7496
Basal-like1958Increased

Statistical significance was determined by the Welch’s test.

Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 to evaluate PITX1 gene expression with box plots according to clinical parameters in breast cancer patients

(A) Age, (B) SBR grade, (C) NPI, (D) ER, (E) PR, (F) HER-2, (G) nodal status, (H) triple-negative status and (I) basal-like status. Statistical significance was determined by the Welch’s test.

The effect of the expression of PITX1 gene on prognosis in breast cancer

The survival curves were plotted with different survival information with survival meta-annalistic software PrognoScan, including distant metastasis-free survival, relapse-free survival and disease-specific survival. Breast cancer patients with PITX1 (blue) showed positive related with distant metastasis-free survival (Figure 4A, P=0.024727, Figure 4B, P=0.045388, Figure 4D, P=0.022601, Figure 4E, P=0.040643, Table 3). The Lower PITX1 expression group with blue curve was with preferable relapse-free survival (Figure 4C, P=0.033187, Figure 4F, P=0.048027, Figure 4G, P=0.007207, Table 3). The higher PITX1 gene expression (red) is related with worse disease-specific survival (Figure 4H–J, P=0.008357, P=0.011151, P=0.022379, Table 3). We also analyzed metastatic relapse free survival and overall survival with Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 with the same trend. Expression of PITX1 (purple) presented positive related with metastatic relapse-free survival (Figure 4K, P=0.0105, Table 3) and increased PITX1 expression presented worse overall survival (Figure 4L, P<0.0001, Table 3).
Figure 4

The survival curve of different datasets based on the expression of PITX1 gene was used to analyze the prognostic value in breast cancer

(A) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (B) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (C) Relapse-Free Survival, (D) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (E) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (F) Relapse-Free Survival, (G) Relapse-Free Survival, (H) DiseaseSpecific Survival, (I) Disease-Specific Survival, (J) Disease-Specific Survival, (K) Metastatic relapse-free survival, (L) Overall Survival.

Table 3

Different datasets to analyze the prognosis of PITX1 gene expression in breast cancer

DatasetProbe IDEnd pointNo.Cox P-valueHR
GSE19615Distant Metastasis-Free Survival209587_at1150.0247272.56 [1.13–5.82]
GSE19615Distant Metastasis-Free Survival208502_s_at1150.0453881.71 [1.01–2.89]
GSE12276Relapse-Free Survival208502_s_at2040.0331871.12 [1.01–1.24]
GSE11121Distant Metastasis-Free Survival209587_at2000.0226011.35 [1.04–1.76]
GSE11121Distant Metastasis-Free Survival208502_s_at2000.0406431.28 [1.01–1.62]
GSE1456-GPL96Relapse-Free Survival209587_at1590.0480271.37 [1.00–1.88]
GSE1456-GPL96Relapse-Free Survival208502_s_at1590.0072071.37 [1.09–1.73]
GSE1456-GPL96Disease-Specific Survival208502_s_at1590.0083571.46 [1.10–1.94]
GSE1456-GPL96Disease-Specific Survival209587_at1590.0111511.65 [1.12–2.42]
GSE3494-GPL96Disease-Specific Survival208502_s_at2360.0223791.24 [1.03–1.49]

The survival curve of different datasets based on the expression of PITX1 gene was used to analyze the prognostic value in breast cancer

(A) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (B) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (C) Relapse-Free Survival, (D) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (E) Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, (F) Relapse-Free Survival, (G) Relapse-Free Survival, (H) DiseaseSpecific Survival, (I) Disease-Specific Survival, (J) Disease-Specific Survival, (K) Metastatic relapse-free survival, (L) Overall Survival.

Co-expression analysis of PITX1 gene

Oncomine database was analyzed to assess the related co-expression gene with PITX1 gene. A total number of 13,363 samples (111 datasets) were searched for the co-expression gene of PITX1 in Oncomine database. The co-expression profile of PITX1 was identified with a large cluster of 12,624 measured genes across 103 invasive breast carcinomas, the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) is a principal co-expression gene (Figure 5A). The co-expression gene NOD2 was associated with PITX1 positively according to Bc-GenExMiner v4.3 (Figure 5B, P<0.0001). We analyzed heat map of PITX1 and NOD2 gene expression in 50 gene QPCR analysis (pam50) (Figure 5C) to make sure positive co-expression relationship in breast cancer subtypes of TCGA database generated by UCSC Xena tool.
Figure 5

Co-expression analysis of gene PITX1 and other genes by Oncomine database analysis

(A) Co-expression analysis of gene PITX1 in 103 invasive breast cancer with Oncomine database. (B). The co-expression gene NOD2 related to PITX1 by bc-GenExMiner software (C). In TCGA database generated by UCSC Xena tool in breast cancer subtypes, the heat map of PITX1 and NOD2 gene expression in 50 gene QPCR analysis (pam50) was analyzed (red represents high expression of gene, blue represents low expression of gene).

Co-expression analysis of gene PITX1 and other genes by Oncomine database analysis

(A) Co-expression analysis of gene PITX1 in 103 invasive breast cancer with Oncomine database. (B). The co-expression gene NOD2 related to PITX1 by bc-GenExMiner software (C). In TCGA database generated by UCSC Xena tool in breast cancer subtypes, the heat map of PITX1 and NOD2 gene expression in 50 gene QPCR analysis (pam50) was analyzed (red represents high expression of gene, blue represents low expression of gene).

Discussion

PITX1 is a member of PITX family member that was considered as development related gene also and tumor suppressor in various carcinoma. The differential expression of PITX1 was found in many tumors. PITX1 binding to the esterogen receptor α (ERα) acted on the ERα enhancer concentration, and controlled the transcription activity through the binding of ERα target gene and PITX1-binding site in breast cancer cells [21]. However, there was no prognostic association analysis in breast cancer. The present study demonstrated that the expression of PITX1 was up-regulated in breast cancer patients with respect to normal individuals according to Oncomine database. High PITX1 expression was correlated with poor clinicopathological features in breast cancer. The present results revealed that higher expression of PITX1 was located in different histological classification of breast cancer with respect to normal individuals, including invasive breast carcinoma, invasive ductal breast carcinoma, invasive lobular breast carcinoma, ductal breast carcinoma, medullary breast carcinoma, invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast carcinoma and tubular breast carcinoma. There was no statistical significance in age and PR status in the analysis. It had been reported that SBR grade and NPI are prognostic factors of breast cancer. The expression of PITX1 gene was significantly higher in SBR Grade, NPI, ER negative, HER2 positive, lymph node positive, triple-negative and basal-like status, which were related to poor prognosis of breast cancer respectively. Therefore, overexpression of PITX1 gene may be new biomarker factor related to the poor prognosis in breast cancer. The survival curve of different datasets based on the expression of PITX1 gene was used to analyze the prognostic value in breast cancer with PrognoScan. According to meta-analysis of survival curve data, ten datasets with clinical statistical value were presented. Breast cancer patients with increased PITX1 gene showed worse relapse-free survival, disease-specific survival. PITX1 was positively correlated with distant metastasis-free survival. The same trend also is confirmed that the increased expression of PITX1 gene showed worse overall survival, and PITX1 was positively correlated with metastatic relapse free survival in Bc-GenExMiner v4.3. We also explored the co-expression relationship gene of PITX1 gene with Oncomine database, which was also verified in Bc-GenExMiner v4.3. NOD2 were regarded co-expression gene of closely related to PITX1 genes positively analyzed by Bc-GenExMiner v4.3. NOD2 increases the risk of breast cancer [22], the research showed that the overexpression of NOD2 inhibited cell proliferation and promoted clone formation in three negative breast cancer cell lines [23]. The incidence of lymph nodes without metastatic is higher in carriers of NOD2 mutations as a prognostic factor [24]. Therefore, the positive correlation between NOD2 and PITX1 gene is reliable. PITX1 is down-regulated in various malignant tumors and correlated with poor prognosis, may be because it enrichs in promoters of binding genes and regulates gene expression as a transcription factor [25]. PITX1 binds to the target gene PDCD5, which is an apoptosis related gene, so the down-regulation of PITX1 is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer [26]. DNA hypermethylation silences PITX1, and the hypermethylation of PITX1 is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) [27]. Hypermethylation of exon 3 of PITX1 was significantly associated with the risk of death in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) [28]. There was no prognostic association analysis in breast cancer. High expression of PITX1 in our research may be because gene methylation level of breast cancer differs from other cancers. As a transcription factor binding ERα in breast cancer [21], high PITX1 expression may have a certain impact on poor prognosis, which is worth further study. In general, under the analysis of various bioinformatic tools, the down-regulation of PITX1 gene was associated with better prognostic clinical parameters such as ER positive, nodal status negative, non-triple-negative, non-basal like status, SBR grade, and NPI. In breast cancer patients, increased PITX1 expression is correlated with worse relapse-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. PITX1 was positively correlated with metastatic relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival. It indicates that breast cancer patients may benefit and have better survival with lower expression of PITX1 gene. Therefore, it may provide some basis for targeted drug therapy related to breast cancer.
  27 in total

1.  ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Jianjun Yu; K Shanker; Nandan Deshpande; Radhika Varambally; Debashis Ghosh; Terrence Barrette; Akhilesh Pandey; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  RNA interference libraries prove their worth in hunt for tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  Julian Downward
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  MiR-675 is frequently overexpressed in gastric cancer and enhances cell proliferation and invasion via targeting a potent anti-tumor gene PITX1.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Yan-Chun Tian; Gang Mao; Yun-Gui Zhang; Li Han
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.315

4.  Strong expression of paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 1 (PITX1) is associated with a favorable outcome in human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Gengbin Kong; Zhaoyong Liu; Kezhou Wu; Ying Zhang; Zhihua Deng; Weili Feng; Shubiao Chen; Hu Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-04

5.  Pitx1 haploinsufficiency causes clubfoot in humans and a clubfoot-like phenotype in mice.

Authors:  David M Alvarado; Kevin McCall; Hyuliya Aferol; Matthew J Silva; Joel R Garbow; William M Spees; Tarpit Patel; Marilyn Siegel; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Decreased PITX1 gene expression in human cutaneous malignant melanoma and its clinicopathological significance.

Authors:  Mitsuhiko Osaki; Hikari Chinen; Yuichi Yoshida; Takahito Ohhira; Naohiro Sunamura; Osamu Yamamoto; Hisao Ito; Mitsuo Oshimura; Hiroyuki Kugoh
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.328

7.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Generation and gene expression profiling of 48 transcription-factor-inducible mouse embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Kohei Yamamizu; Alexei A Sharov; Yulan Piao; Misa Amano; Hong Yu; Akira Nishiyama; Dawood B Dudekula; David Schlessinger; Minoru S H Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Intragenic DNA methylation of PITX1 and the adjacent long non-coding RNA C5orf66-AS1 are prognostic biomarkers in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Verena Sailer; Arthur Charpentier; Joern Dietrich; Timo J Vogt; Alina Franzen; Friedrich Bootz; Dimo Dietrich; Andreas Schroeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA hypermethyation and silencing of PITX1 correlated with advanced stage and poor postoperative prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Otsubo; Kazuhiko Yamada; Teruki Hagiwara; Kenshiro Oshima; Kei Iida; Koro Nishikata; Tetsuro Toyoda; Toru Igari; Kyoko Nohara; Satoshi Yamashita; Masahira Hattori; Taeko Dohi; Yuki I Kawamura
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-28
View more
  5 in total

1.  Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers of Glioblastoma Based on Multidatabase Integration and Its Correlation with Immune-Infiltration Cells.

Authors:  Wencong Ding; Xian Zhou; Guoqiang Jiang; Weiwei Xu; Songkai Long; Fan Xiao; Yongshi Liao; Jia Liu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.501

2.  Identification of novel biomarkers in breast cancer via integrated bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.

Authors:  Ningning Wang; Haichen Zhang; Dan Li; Chunteng Jiang; Haidong Zhao; Yun Teng
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

3.  Upregulated Transcription Factor PITX1 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma-Based Bioinformatic Analysis and Experimental Verification.

Authors:  Yinglang Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Wei Zhang; Hailong Hu; Guochang Bao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Ultrasonic Omics Based on Intelligent Classification Algorithm in Hormone Receptor Expression and Efficacy Evaluation of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Musu Ala; Jianlin Wu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression, Prognosis, and Biological Significance of OVOLs in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jingsheng Chen; Hongjun Tang; Taidong Li; Kangwei Jiang; Haiming Zhong; Yuye Wu; Jiangtao He; Dongbing Li; Mengzhen Li; Xingsheng Cai
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.