Ingrid Segers1, Erlisa Bardhi1,2, Ileana Mateizel1, Ellen Van Moer1, Rik Schots3, Greta Verheyen1, Herman Tournaye1, Michel De Vos1,4,5. 1. Centre for Reproductive Medicine (CRG), University Hospital Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. 2. Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy. 3. Department of Hematology, University Hospital Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 4. Follicle Biology Laboratory (FOBI), UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels 1090, Belgium. 5. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Perinatology and Reproductology, Institute of Professional Education, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Can oocytes extracted from excised ovarian tissue and matured in vitro be a useful adjunct for urgent fertility preservation (FP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian tissue oocyte in-vitro maturation (OTO-IVM) in combination with ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is a valuable adjunct technique for FP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite the impressive progress in the field, options for FP for cancer patients are still limited and, depending on the technique, clinical outcome data are still scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital-affiliated fertility clinic between January 2012 and May 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included 77 patients who underwent unilateral oophorectomy for OTC. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained during ovarian tissue processing were matured in vitro for 28-42 h. Oocytes reaching metaphase II stage were vitrified or inseminated for embryo vitrification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 1220 COCs were collected. The mean oocyte maturation rate was 39% ± 23% (SD). There were 64 patients who had vitrification of oocytes (6.7 ± 6.3 oocytes per patient). There were 13 patients who had ICSI of mature oocytes after IVM, with 2.0 ± 2.0 embryos vitrified per patient. Twelve patients have returned to the clinic with a desire for pregnancy. For seven of these, OTO-IVM material was thawed. Two patients had OTO-IVM oocytes warmed, with survival rates of 86% and 60%. After ICSI, six oocytes were fertilised in total, generating three good quality embryos for transfer, leading to a healthy live birth for one patient. In five patients, for whom a mean of 2.0 ± 0.8 (SD) embryos had been vitrified, seven embryos were warmed in total: one embryo did not survive the warming process; two tested genetically unsuitable for transfer; and four were transferred in separate cycles to three different patients, resulting in two healthy babies. In this small series, the live birth rate per patient after OTO-IVM, ICSI and embryo transfer was 43%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective study design and the limited sample size should be considered when interpreting results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of the study illustrate the added value of OTO-IVM in combination with OTC. We report the first live birth following the use of this appended technique combined with oocyte vitrification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. M.D.V. reports honoraria for lectures in the last 2 years from MSD and Ferring, outside the submitted work, as well as grant support from MSD. The other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
STUDY QUESTION: Can oocytes extracted from excised ovarian tissue and matured in vitro be a useful adjunct for urgent fertility preservation (FP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian tissue oocyte in-vitro maturation (OTO-IVM) in combination with ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is a valuable adjunct technique for FP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite the impressive progress in the field, options for FP for cancerpatients are still limited and, depending on the technique, clinical outcome data are still scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital-affiliated fertility clinic between January 2012 and May 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included 77 patients who underwent unilateral oophorectomy for OTC. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained during ovarian tissue processing were matured in vitro for 28-42 h. Oocytes reaching metaphase II stage were vitrified or inseminated for embryo vitrification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 1220 COCs were collected. The mean oocyte maturation rate was 39% ± 23% (SD). There were 64 patients who had vitrification of oocytes (6.7 ± 6.3 oocytes per patient). There were 13 patients who had ICSI of mature oocytes after IVM, with 2.0 ± 2.0 embryos vitrified per patient. Twelve patients have returned to the clinic with a desire for pregnancy. For seven of these, OTO-IVM material was thawed. Two patients had OTO-IVM oocytes warmed, with survival rates of 86% and 60%. After ICSI, six oocytes were fertilised in total, generating three good quality embryos for transfer, leading to a healthy live birth for one patient. In five patients, for whom a mean of 2.0 ± 0.8 (SD) embryos had been vitrified, seven embryos were warmed in total: one embryo did not survive the warming process; two tested genetically unsuitable for transfer; and four were transferred in separate cycles to three different patients, resulting in two healthy babies. In this small series, the live birth rate per patient after OTO-IVM, ICSI and embryo transfer was 43%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective study design and the limited sample size should be considered when interpreting results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of the study illustrate the added value of OTO-IVM in combination with OTC. We report the first live birth following the use of this appended technique combined with oocyte vitrification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. M.D.V. reports honoraria for lectures in the last 2 years from MSD and Ferring, outside the submitted work, as well as grant support from MSD. The other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Authors: Fatemeh Anbari; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Maryam Mahaldashtian; Alireza Ahmadi; Maria Grazia Palmerini Journal: Turk J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Teresa K Woodruff; Lauren Ataman-Millhouse; Kelly S Acharya; Teresa Almeida-Santos; Antoinette Anazodo; Richard A Anderson; Leslie Appiah; Joy Bader; Kerri Becktell; Robert E Brannigan; Lesley Breech; Maria T Bourlon; Žana Bumbuliene; Karen Burns; Lisa Campo-Engelstein; Jacira R Campos; Grace M Centola; Mauricio Barbour Chehin; Diane Chen; Michel De Vos; Francesca E Duncan; Ahmed El-Damen; Douglas Fair; Yemi Famuyiwa; Patricia Y Fechner; Paula Fontoura; Olivia Frias; Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Jill Ginsberg; Clarisa R Gracia; Kara Goldman; Veronica Gomez-Lobo; Brent Hazelrigg; Michael H Hsieh; Luis R Hoyos; Alfonso Hoyos-Martinez; Robert Jach; Jacek Jassem; Murid Javed; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Roohi Jeelani; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Nalini Kaul-Mahajan; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Tyler G Ketterl; Mohamed Khrouf; Dana Kimelman; Atsuko Kusuhara; William H Kutteh; Monica M Laronda; Jung Ryeol Lee; Vicky Lehmann; Joseph M Letourneau; Lynda K McGinnis; Eileen McMahon; Lillian R Meacham; Monserrat Fabiola Velez Mijangos; Molly Moravek; Leena Nahata; George Moses Ogweno; Kyle E Orwig; Mary Ellen Pavone; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori; Romina Ileana Pesce; Hanna Pulaski; Gwendolyn Quinn; Ramiro Quintana; Tomas Quintana; Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Joyce Reinecke; Fernando M Reis; Julie Rios; Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak; Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg; Cassandra Roeca; Seth J Rotz; Erin Rowell; Mahmoud Salama; Amanda J Saraf; Anibal Scarella; Tara Schafer-Kalkhoff; Deb Schmidt; Suneeta Senapati; Divya Shah; Ariella Shikanov; Margarett Shnorhavorian; Jodi L Skiles; James F Smith; Kristin Smith; Fabio Sobral; Kyle Stimpert; H Irene Su; Kouhei Sugimoto; Nao Suzuki; Mili Thakur; David Victorson; Luz Viale; Wendy Vitek; W Hamish Wallace; Ellen A Wartella; Lynn M Westphal; Stacy Whiteside; Lea H Wilcox; Christine Wyns; Shuo Xiao; Jing Xu; Mary Zelinski Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Michel De Vos; Michaël Grynberg; Tuong M Ho; Ye Yuan; David F Albertini; Robert B Gilchrist Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Charlotte Sonigo; Nelly Frydman; Anne Mayeur; Vincent Puy; Victoria Windal; Laetitia Hesters; Vanessa Gallot; Alexandra Benoit; Michael Grynberg Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.357