Literature DB >> 32828885

Nerve input to tumours: Pathophysiological consequences of a dynamic relationship.

Charlotte Hutchings1, Jade A Phillips1, Mustafa B A Djamgoz2.   

Abstract

It is well known that tumours arising in different organs are innervated and that 'perineural invasion' (cancer cells escaping from the tumour by following the nerve trunk) is a negative prognostic factor. More surprisingly, increasing evidence suggests that the nerves can provide active inputs to tumours and there is two-way communication between nerves and cancer cells within the tumour microenvironment. Cells of the immune system also interact with the nerves and cancer cells. Thus, the nerve connections can exert significant control over cancer progression and modulating these (physically or chemically) can affect significantly the cancer process. Nerve inputs to tumours are derived mainly from the sympathetic (adrenergic) and the parasympathetic (cholinergic) systems, which are interactive. An important component of the latter is the vagus nerve, the largest of the cranial nerves. Here, we present a two-part review of the nerve inputs to tumours and their effects on tumorigenesis. First, we review briefly some relevant general issues including ultrastructural aspects, stemness, interactions between neurones and primary tumours, and communication between neurones and metastasizing tumour cells. Ultrastructural characteristics include synaptic vesicles, tumour microtubes and gap junctions enabling formation of cellular networks. Second, we evaluate the pathophysiology of the nerve input to five major carcinomas: cancers of prostate, stomach, colon, lung and pancreas. For each cancer, we present (i) the nerve inputs normally present in the cancer organ and (ii) how these interact and influence the cancer process. The best clinical evidence for the role of nerves in promoting tumorigenesis comes from prostate cancer patients where metastatic progression has been shown to be suppressed significantly in cases of spinal cord injury. The balance of the sympathetic and parasympathetic contributions to early versus late tumorigenesis varies amongst the different cancers. Different branches of the vagus provide functional inputs to several of the carcinomas and, in two-way interaction with the sympathetic nervous system, affect different stages of the cancer process. Overall, the impact of the vagus nerve can be 'direct' or 'indirect'. Directly, the effect of the vagus is primarily to promote tumorigenesis and this is mediated through cholinergic receptor mechanisms. Indirectly, pro- and anti-tumour effects can occur by stimulation or inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system, respectively. Less well understood are the 'indirect' anti-tumour effect of the vagus nerve via immunomodulation/inflammation, and the role of sensory innervation. A frequent occurrence in the nerve-tumour interactions is the presence of positive feedback driven by agents like nerve growth factor. We conclude that the nerve inputs to tumours can actively and dynamically impact upon cancer progression and are open to clinical exploitation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microenvironment - feedback; Parasympathetic; Sensory; Sympathetic; Vagus nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32828885     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer        ISSN: 0304-419X            Impact factor:   10.680


  12 in total

1.  Ion Transporting Proteins and Cancer: Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 5.545

Review 2.  Regulation of Carcinogenesis by Sensory Neurons and Neuromediators.

Authors:  Nuray Erin; Galina V Shurin; James H Baraldi; Michael R Shurin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Clinical Potential of Nerve Input to Tumors: A Bioelectricity Perspective.

Authors:  Jade A Phillips; Charlotte Hutchings; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2021-03-16

4.  Construction of differential expression plasmids of NGF to detect its influence on PC12 cell neuronal differentiation.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Lili Zou; Peng Wang; Jingxuan Zhou; Chunling Yuan; Jun Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Neural regulations of the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Anthony C Restaino; Paola D Vermeer
Journal:  FASEB Bioadv       Date:  2021-09-12

6.  Worst Pattern of Perineural Invasion Redefines the Spatial Localization of Nerves in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Fu; Xinwen Zhang; Zhuang Ding; Nisha Zhu; Yuxian Song; Xiaoxin Zhang; Yue Jing; Yijun Yu; Xiaofeng Huang; Lei Zhang; Qingang Hu; Yanhong Ni; Liang Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  TP73-AS1 promotes gastric cancer proliferation and invasion by regulation miR-27b-3p/TMED5 axis.

Authors:  Chenhui Bao; Lin Guo
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  Schwann Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment: Need More Attention.

Authors:  Leqi Sun; Shuhai Chen; Mingyou Chen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Construction of a Myc-associated ceRNA network reveals a prognostic signature in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Zhang; Yi Shi; Ji-Bin Liu; Xiao-Li Yang; Rui Xin; Hui-Min Wang; Pei-Yao Wang; Cheng-You Jia; Wen-Jie Zhang; Yu-Shui Ma; Da Fu
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 8.886

10.  Autophagic Schwann cells promote perineural invasion mediated by the NGF/ATG7 paracrine pathway in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wunai Zhang; Rui He; Wenbin Yang; Yan Zhang; Qinggong Yuan; Jixin Wang; Yang Liu; Shuo Chen; Simei Zhang; Weifan Zhang; Zeen Zhu; Jing Zhang; Zheng Wang; Junhui Li
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.