Literature DB >> 3282822

Cardiovascular effects of conventional positive pressure ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation.

J Räsänen1, J B Downs, M C Stock.   

Abstract

The hemodynamic sequelae of conventional positive pressure ventilation (CPPV), airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), and spontaneous breathing were compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in ten anesthetized dogs who had ventilatory failure with and without parenchymal lung injury. The APRV corrected respiratory acidosis without significantly effecting arterial blood oxygenation, venous admixture, cardiovascular function, or tissue oxygen utilization. Application of CPPV precipitated marked depressions in blood pressure, stroke volume, and cardiac output. A concomitant decrease in venous admixture did not compensate for these adverse cardiovascular effects. Deterioration of tissue oxygen delivery resulted in oxygen supply-demand imbalance during CPPV. The results of this experimental study indicate that if ventilatory augmentation of subjects who require CPAP is desired, APRV will enhance alveolar ventilation without compromising circulatory function and tissue oxygen balance, whereas CPPV will impair cardiovascular function significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3282822     DOI: 10.1378/chest.93.5.911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  15 in total

Review 1.  Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Martyn Hawkins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Applications of airway pressure release ventilation.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; A A El-Solh; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 3.  Consensus conference on mechanical ventilation--January 28-30, 1993 at Northbrook, Illinois, USA. Part 2.

Authors:  A S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs. intermittent mandatory pressure release ventilation (IMPRV) in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  J J Rouby; M Ben Ameur; D Jawish; A Cherif; A Andreev; S Dreux; P Viars
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  [Analgesia and sedation in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  E Schaffrath; R Kuhlen; P H Tonner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Airway pressure release ventilation: a neonatal case series and review of current practice.

Authors:  Shikha Gupta; Vinay Joshi; Preetha Joshi; Shelley Monkman; Kelly Vaillancourt; Karen Choong
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.409

7.  A comparison of continuous positive pressure ventilation, combined high frequency ventilation and airway pressure release ventilation on experimental lung injury.

Authors:  I Jousela; K Linko; A Mäkeläinen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Ventilation with biphasic positive airway pressure in experimental lung injury. Influence of transpulmonary pressure on gas exchange and haemodynamics.

Authors:  Dietrich Henzler; Rolf Dembinski; Ralf Bensberg; Nadine Hochhausen; Rolf Rossaint; Ralf Kuhlen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Clinical review: biphasic positive airway pressure and airway pressure release ventilation.

Authors:  Christian Putensen; Hermann Wrigge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Airway pressure release ventilation.

Authors:  Ehab G Daoud
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.