OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether improvement in ventilation perfusion (.V(A)/.Q) distribution during mechanical ventilation using biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) with spontaneous breathing may be attributed to an effectively increased transpulmonary pressure (P(TP)) and can also be achieved by increasing P(TP) during controlled ventilation. DESIGN: In 12 pigs with saline lavage-induced lung injury we compared the effects of BIPAP to pressure-controlled ventilation with equal airway pressure (PCV(AW)) or equal transpulmonary pressure (PCV(TP)) on V(A)/.Q distribution assessed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). SETTING: Animal laboratory study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intrapulmonary shunt was 33+/-11% during BIPAP, 36+/-10% during PCV(AW) and 33+/-15% during PCV(TP) ( p= n.s.). BIPAP resulted in higher PaO(2) than PCV(AW) (188+/-83 versus 147+/-82 mmHg, p < 0.05), but not than PCV(TP) (187+/-139 mmHg). Oxygen delivery was significantly higher during BIPAP (530+/-109 ml/min) versus 374+/-113 ml/min during PCV(AW) and 353+/-93 ml/min during PCV(TP) ( p < 0.005). Tidal volume with PCV(TP) increased to 11.9+/-2.3 ml/kg, compared to 8.5+/-0.8 with BIPAP and 7.6+/-1.4 with PCV(AW) ( p <0.001) and cardiac output decreased to 3.5+/-0.6 l/min (BIPAP 4.9+/-0.8 and PCV(AW) 3.9+/-0.8, p<0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In experimental lung injury, BIPAP with preserved spontaneous breathing was effective in increasing regional P(TP), since pressure-controlled ventilation with the same P(TP) resulted in similar gas exchange effects. However, PCV(TP) caused increased airway pressures and tidal volumes, whereby, with BIPAP, less depression of oxygen delivery and cardiac output were observed. BIPAP could be useful in maintaining pulmonary gas exchange and slightly improving oxygenation without interfering with circulation as strongly as PCV does.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether improvement in ventilation perfusion (.V(A)/.Q) distribution during mechanical ventilation using biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) with spontaneous breathing may be attributed to an effectively increased transpulmonary pressure (P(TP)) and can also be achieved by increasing P(TP) during controlled ventilation. DESIGN: In 12 pigs with saline lavage-induced lung injury we compared the effects of BIPAP to pressure-controlled ventilation with equal airway pressure (PCV(AW)) or equal transpulmonary pressure (PCV(TP)) on V(A)/.Q distribution assessed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). SETTING: Animal laboratory study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intrapulmonary shunt was 33+/-11% during BIPAP, 36+/-10% during PCV(AW) and 33+/-15% during PCV(TP) ( p= n.s.). BIPAP resulted in higher PaO(2) than PCV(AW) (188+/-83 versus 147+/-82 mmHg, p < 0.05), but not than PCV(TP) (187+/-139 mmHg). Oxygen delivery was significantly higher during BIPAP (530+/-109 ml/min) versus 374+/-113 ml/min during PCV(AW) and 353+/-93 ml/min during PCV(TP) ( p < 0.005). Tidal volume with PCV(TP) increased to 11.9+/-2.3 ml/kg, compared to 8.5+/-0.8 with BIPAP and 7.6+/-1.4 with PCV(AW) ( p <0.001) and cardiac output decreased to 3.5+/-0.6 l/min (BIPAP 4.9+/-0.8 and PCV(AW) 3.9+/-0.8, p<0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In experimental lung injury, BIPAP with preserved spontaneous breathing was effective in increasing regional P(TP), since pressure-controlled ventilation with the same P(TP) resulted in similar gas exchange effects. However, PCV(TP) caused increased airway pressures and tidal volumes, whereby, with BIPAP, less depression of oxygen delivery and cardiac output were observed. BIPAP could be useful in maintaining pulmonary gas exchange and slightly improving oxygenation without interfering with circulation as strongly as PCV does.
Authors: P Pelosi; M Goldner; A McKibben; A Adams; G Eccher; P Caironi; S Losappio; L Gattinoni; J J Marini Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Dirk Varelmann; Thomas Muders; Jörg Zinserling; Ulf Guenther; Anders Magnusson; Göran Hedenstierna; Christian Putensen; Hermann Wrigge Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 9.097