Literature DB >> 32826749

Measurement Properties of the CAPACITY Instrument to Assess Perceived Communication With the Health Care Team Among Care Partners of Patients With Cognitive Impairment.

Courtney H Van Houtven1,2,3, Steven J Lippmann2, Emmanuelle Bélanger4,5, Valerie A Smith1,2,6, Hailey J James2,7, Megan Shepherd-Banigan1,2, Eric Jutkowitz4,8, Emily O'Brien2, Jennifer L Wolff9,10, James R Burke11,12, Brenda L Plassman11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The CAregiver Perceptions About CommunIcaTion with Clinical Team members (CAPACITY) instrument measures how care partners perceive themselves to be supported by the patient's health care team and their experiences communicating with the team.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the measurement properties (ie, structural validity of the construct and internal consistency) of the CAPACITY instrument in care partners of patients with cognitive impairment, and to examine whether care partner health literacy and patient cognitive impairment are associated with a higher or lower CAPACITY score. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study.
SUBJECTS: A total of 1746 dyads of community-dwelling care partners and older adults in the United States with cognitive impairment who obtained an amyloid positron emission tomography scan. MEASURES: The CAPACITY instrument comprises 12 items that can be combined as a total score or examined as subdomain scores about communication with the team and care partner capacity-assessment by the team. The 2 covariates of primary interest in the regression model are health literacy and level of cognitive impairment of the patient (Modified Telephone Interview Cognitive Status).
RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis showed the CAPACITY items fit the expected 2-factor structure (communication and capacity). Higher cognitive functioning of patients and higher health literacy among care partners was associated with lower communication domain scores, lower capacity domain scores, and lower overall CAPACITY scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The strong psychometric validity of the CAPACITY measure indicates it could have utility in other family caregivers or care partner studies assessing the quality of interactions with clinical teams. Knowing that CAPACITY differs by care partner health literacy and patient impairment level may help health care teams employ tailored strategies to achieve high-quality care partner interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32826749      PMCID: PMC7717666          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   3.178


  30 in total

1.  Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia.

Authors:  Gil D Rabinovici; Constantine Gatsonis; Charles Apgar; Kiran Chaudhary; Ilana Gareen; Lucy Hanna; James Hendrix; Bruce E Hillner; Cynthia Olson; Orit H Lesman-Segev; Justin Romanoff; Barry A Siegel; Rachel A Whitmer; Maria C Carrillo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.

Authors:  Thomas J Dunn; Thom Baguley; Vivienne Brunsden
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-08-06

Review 4.  A Synthesis Of Knowledge About Caregiver Decision Making Finds Gaps In Support For Those Who Care For Aging Loved Ones.

Authors:  Mirjam M Garvelink; Patrice A G Ngangue; Rheda Adekpedjou; Ndeye T Diouf; Larissa Goh; Louisa Blair; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Authors:  M Stewart; J B Brown; A Donner; I R McWhinney; J Oates; W W Weston; J Jordan
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Shared decision making with frail older patients: Proposed teaching framework and practice recommendations.

Authors:  Marjolein H J van de Pol; Cornelia R M G Fluit; Joep Lagro; Yvonne Slaats; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2016-12-27

7.  Cognitive impairment is the major risk factor for development of geriatric syndromes during hospitalization: results from the GIFA study.

Authors:  Patrizia Mecocci; Eva von Strauss; Antonio Cherubini; Sara Ercolani; Elena Mariani; Umberto Senin; Bengt Winblad; Laura Fratiglioni
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 2.959

8.  The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks.

Authors:  Leontine Groen-van de Ven; Carolien Smits; Marijke Span; Jan Jukema; Krista Coppoolse; Jacomine de Lange; Jan Eefsting; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.878

9.  Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Katharine A Bradley; Edward J Boyko
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Health Literacy and Access to Care.

Authors:  Helen Levy; Alex Janke
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Care Intensity and Work on the Mental Health of Family Caregivers: Losses and Gains.

Authors:  Ingo W K Kolodziej; Norma B Coe; Courtney H Van Houtven
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.