Gil D Rabinovici1,2, Constantine Gatsonis3,4, Charles Apgar5, Kiran Chaudhary1, Ilana Gareen3,6, Lucy Hanna3, James Hendrix7, Bruce E Hillner8, Cynthia Olson5, Orit H Lesman-Segev1, Justin Romanoff3, Barry A Siegel9, Rachel A Whitmer10,11, Maria C Carrillo7. 1. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco. 2. Associate Editor. 3. Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 5. American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 7. Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. 9. Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 10. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California. 11. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis.
Abstract
Importance: Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) detects amyloid plaques in the brain, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease. Objective: To determine if amyloid PET is associated with subsequent changes in the management of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of uncertain etiology. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study was a single-group, multisite longitudinal study that assessed the association between amyloid PET and subsequent changes in clinical management for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia. Participants were required to meet published appropriate use criteria stating that etiology of cognitive impairment was unknown, Alzheimer disease was a diagnostic consideration, and knowledge of PET results was expected to change diagnosis and management. A total of 946 dementia specialists at 595 US sites enrolled 16 008 patients between February 2016 and September 2017. Patients were followed up through January 2018. Dementia specialists documented their diagnosis and management plan before PET and again 90 (±30) days after PET. Exposures: Participants underwent amyloid PET at 343 imaging centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in management between the pre- and post-PET visits, as assessed by a composite outcome that included Alzheimer disease drug therapy, other drug therapy, and counseling about safety and future planning. The study was powered to detect a 30% or greater change in the MCI and dementia groups. One of 2 secondary end points is reported: the proportion of changes in diagnosis (from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease and vice versa) between pre- and post-PET visits. Results: Among 16 008 registered participants, 11 409 (71.3%) completed study procedures and were included in the analysis (median age, 75 years [interquartile range, 71-80]; 50.9% women; 60.5% with MCI). Amyloid PET results were positive in 3817 patients with MCI (55.3%) and 3154 patients with dementia (70.1%). The composite end point changed in 4159 of 6905 patients with MCI (60.2% [95% CI, 59.1%-61.4%]) and 2859 of 4504 patients with dementia (63.5% [95% CI, 62.1%-64.9%]), significantly exceeding the 30% threshold in each group (P < .001, 1-sided). The etiologic diagnosis changed from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease in 2860 of 11 409 patients (25.1% [95% CI, 24.3%-25.9%]) and from non-Alzheimer disease to Alzheimer disease in 1201 of 11 409 (10.5% [95% CI, 10.0%-11.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia of uncertain etiology evaluated by dementia specialists, the use of amyloid PET was associated with changes in clinical management within 90 days. Further research is needed to determine whether amyloid PET is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02420756.
Importance: Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) detects amyloid plaques in the brain, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease. Objective: To determine if amyloid PET is associated with subsequent changes in the management of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of uncertain etiology. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study was a single-group, multisite longitudinal study that assessed the association between amyloid PET and subsequent changes in clinical management for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia. Participants were required to meet published appropriate use criteria stating that etiology of cognitive impairment was unknown, Alzheimer disease was a diagnostic consideration, and knowledge of PET results was expected to change diagnosis and management. A total of 946 dementia specialists at 595 US sites enrolled 16 008 patients between February 2016 and September 2017. Patients were followed up through January 2018. Dementia specialists documented their diagnosis and management plan before PET and again 90 (±30) days after PET. Exposures: Participants underwent amyloid PET at 343 imaging centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in management between the pre- and post-PET visits, as assessed by a composite outcome that included Alzheimer disease drug therapy, other drug therapy, and counseling about safety and future planning. The study was powered to detect a 30% or greater change in the MCI and dementia groups. One of 2 secondary end points is reported: the proportion of changes in diagnosis (from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease and vice versa) between pre- and post-PET visits. Results: Among 16 008 registered participants, 11 409 (71.3%) completed study procedures and were included in the analysis (median age, 75 years [interquartile range, 71-80]; 50.9% women; 60.5% with MCI). Amyloid PET results were positive in 3817 patients with MCI (55.3%) and 3154 patients with dementia (70.1%). The composite end point changed in 4159 of 6905 patients with MCI (60.2% [95% CI, 59.1%-61.4%]) and 2859 of 4504 patients with dementia (63.5% [95% CI, 62.1%-64.9%]), significantly exceeding the 30% threshold in each group (P < .001, 1-sided). The etiologic diagnosis changed from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease in 2860 of 11 409 patients (25.1% [95% CI, 24.3%-25.9%]) and from non-Alzheimer disease to Alzheimer disease in 1201 of 11 409 (10.5% [95% CI, 10.0%-11.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia of uncertain etiology evaluated by dementia specialists, the use of amyloid PET was associated with changes in clinical management within 90 days. Further research is needed to determine whether amyloid PET is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02420756.
Authors: Rachel L Nosheny; Monica R Camacho; Chengshi Jin; John Neuhaus; Diana Truran; Derek Flenniken; Miriam Ashford; Maria C Carrillo; Keith N Fargo; James Hendrix; Lucy Hanna; Gil Rabinovici; Paul Maruff; R Scott Mackin; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Antoine Leuzy; Kerstin Heurling; Susan De Santi; Santiago Bullich; Oskar Hansson; Johan Lilja Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-08-25
Authors: Artur Martins Coutinho; Geraldo F Busatto; Fábio Henrique de Gobbi Porto; Daniele de Paula Faria; Carla Rachel Ono; Alexandre Teles Garcez; Paula Squarzoni; Fábio Luiz de Souza Duran; Maira Okada de Oliveira; Eduardo Sturzeneker Tres; Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki; Orestes Vicente Forlenza; Ricardo Nitrini; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Eric Jutkowitz; Courtney H Van Houtven; Brenda L Plassman; Vincent Mor Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2020 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Hailey J James; Courtney Harold Van Houtven; Steven Lippmann; James R Burke; Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Emmanuelle Belanger; Terrie Fox Wetle; Brenda L Plassman Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472