| Literature DB >> 32825543 |
Francisco Javier Rondán-Cataluña1, Patricio E Ramírez-Correa2, Jorge Arenas-Gaitán1, Muriel Ramírez-Santana3, Elizabeth E Grandón4, Jorge Alfaro-Pérez2.
Abstract
The growth of older adults in new regions poses challenges for public health. We know that these seniors live increasingly alone, and this impairs their health and general wellbeing. Studies suggest that social networking sites (SNS) can reduce isolation, improve social participation, and increase autonomy. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the characteristics of older adult users of SNS in these new territories. Without this information, it is not possible to improve the adoption of SNS in this population. Based on decision trees, this study analyzes how the elderly users of various SNS in Chile are like. For this purpose, a segmentation of the different groups of elderly users of social networks was constructed, and the most discriminating variables concerning the use of these applications were classified. The results highlight the existence of considerable differences between the various social networks analyzed in their use and characterization. Educational level is the most discriminating variable, and gender influences the types of SNS use. In general, it is observed that the higher the educational level, the more the different social networking sites are used.Entities:
Keywords: Chile; decision trees; older adults; segmentation; social networking sites
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825543 PMCID: PMC7503771 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Decision tree of elderly YouTube users.
Estimation risk for using YouTube (CHAID method).
| Method | Estimation | Error Dev. |
|---|---|---|
| Resubstitution | 0.276 | 0.022 |
| Cross-Validation | 0.296 | 0.023 |
Classification success for using YouTube.
| Observed | Predicted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Right% | |
| No | 41 | 95 | 30.1 |
| Yes | 14 | 245 | 94.6 |
| Global% | 13.9 | 86.1 | 72.4 |
Earnings for nodes: target those who do use YouTube.
| Node | Node | Gain | Answer% | Index% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| 9 | 101 | 25.6 | 82 | 31.7 | 81.2 | 123.8 |
| 5 | 11 | 2.8 | 8 | 3.1 | 72.7 | 110.9 |
| 8 | 120 | 30.4 | 83 | 32.0 | 69.2 | 105.5 |
| 6 | 108 | 27.3 | 72 | 27.8 | 66.7 | 101.7 |
| 7 | 18 | 4.6 | 5 | 1.9 | 27.8 | 42.4 |
| 4 | 37 | 9.4 | 9 | 3.5 | 24.3 | 37.1 |
Figure 2Decision tree of elderly Facebook users.
Estimation risk for using Facebook (CHAID method).
| Method | Estimation | Error Dev. |
|---|---|---|
| Resubstitution | 0.319 | 0.023 |
| Cross-Validation | 0.347 | 0.024 |
Classification success for using Facebook.
| Observed | Predicted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Right% | |
| No | 23 | 122 | 15.9 |
| Yes | 4 | 246 | 98.4 |
| Global% | 6.8 | 93.2 | 68.1 |
Earnings for nodes: target those who do use Facebook.
| Node | Node | Gain | Answer% | Index% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| 2 | 126 | 31.9 | 94 | 37.6 | 74.6 | 117.9 |
| 7 | 105 | 26.6 | 75 | 30.0 | 71.4 | 112.9 |
| 6 | 14 | 3.5 | 8 | 3.2 | 57.1 | 90.3 |
| 4 | 7 | 1.8 | 4 | 1.6 | 57.1 | 90.3 |
| 8 | 116 | 29.4 | 65 | 26.0 | 56.0 | 88.5 |
| 9 | 8 | 2.0 | 4 | 1.6 | 50.0 | 79.0 |
| 10 | 19 | 4.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Figure 3Decision tree of elderly Instagram users.
Estimation risk for using Instagram (CHAID method).
| Method | Estimation | Error Dev. |
|---|---|---|
| Resubstitution | 0.246 | 0.022 |
| Cross-Validation | 0.246 | 0.022 |
Classification success for using Instagram.
| Observed | Predicted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Right% | |
| No | 298 | 0 | 100.0 |
| Yes | 97 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Global% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 75.4 |
Earnings for nodes: target those who do use Instagram.
| Node | Node | Gain | Answer% | Index% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| 3 | 38 | 9.6 | 37 | 12.4 | 97.4 | 129.1 |
| 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 8 | 2.7 | 80.0 | 106.0 |
| 6 | 229 | 58.0 | 178 | 59.7 | 77.7 | 103.0 |
| 5 | 118 | 29.9 | 75 | 25.2 | 63.6 | 84.2 |
Figure 4Decision tree of elderly Twitter users.
Estimation risk for using Twitter (CHAID method).
| Method | Estimation | Error Dev. |
|---|---|---|
| Resubstitution | 0.162 | 0.019 |
| Cross-Validation | 0.162 | 0.019 |
Classification success for using Twitter.
| Observed | Predicted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Right% | |
| No | 331 | 0 | 100.0 |
| Yes | 64 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Global% | 100.0 | 0.0 | 83.8 |
Earnings for nodes: target those who do use Twitter.
| Node | Node | Gain | Answer% | Index% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| 1 | 48 | 12.2 | 48 | 14.5 | 100.0 | 119.3 |
| 2 | 126 | 31.9 | 111 | 33.5 | 88.1 | 105.1 |
| 4 | 105 | 26.6 | 90 | 27.2 | 85.7 | 102.3 |
| 5 | 116 | 29.4 | 82 | 24.8 | 70.7 | 84.4 |
Figure 5Decision tree of elderly WhatsApp users.
Estimation risk for using WhatsApp (CHAID method).
| Method | Estimation | Error Dev. |
|---|---|---|
| Resubstitution | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Cross-Validation | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Classification success for using WhatsApp.
| Observed | Predicted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Right% | |
| No | 0 | 4 | 0.0 |
| Yes | 0 | 391 | 100.0 |
| Global% | 0.0 | 100.0 | 99.0 |
Earnings for nodes: target those who do use WhatsApp.
| Node | Node | Gain | Answer% | Index% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| 1 | 282 | 71.4 | 282 | 72.1 | 100.0 | 101.0 |
| 2 | 113 | 28.6 | 109 | 27.9 | 96.5 | 97.4 |
Independent variables by level in the decision trees that explain the use of SNS.
| Level | YouTube | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Education | Education | Education | Education | Age |
| 2 | Employee | Gender | Age | Gender | |
| 3 | Age |