| Literature DB >> 32825353 |
Joanna Milart1, Aneta Lewicka2, Katarzyna Jobs1, Agata Wawrzyniak1, Małgorzata Majder-Łopatka3, Bolesław Kalicki1.
Abstract
Vitamin D supplementation in patients with urolithiasis and hypercalciuria is considered to be unsafe. We analyzed the impact of vitamin D supplementation on selected health status parameters in children with idiopathic hypercalciuria. The study included 36 children with urolithiasis resulting from excessive calcium excretion. The level of calcium and 25(OH)D (hydroxylated vitamin D - calcidiol) in serum, urinary calcium excretion and the presence of stones in urinary tract were assessed prospectively. Blood and urine samples were collected at the time when the patient was qualified for the study and every three months up to 24 month of vitamin D intake at a dose of 400 or 800 IU/day. At time zero and at 12, and 24 months of vitamin D supplementation, densitometry was performed. Supplementation with vitamin D caused a statistically significant increase in the concentration of 25(OH)D in serum. There were no significant changes in calcium concentration in serum, excretion of calcium in urine but also in bone density. There was no significant increase in the risk of formation or development of stones in the urinary tract. Supplementation with vitamin D (400-800 IU/day) in children with idiopathic hypercalciuria significantly increases 25(OH)D concentration, does not affect calciuria, but also does not improve bone density.Entities:
Keywords: bone density; children; idiopathic hypercalciuria; urolithiasis; vitamin D treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825353 PMCID: PMC7551195 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Study stages.
Values of the calcium-creatinine index in children, indicative of hypercalciuria.
| Age | mg Calcium/mg Creatinine |
|---|---|
| <1 year | <0.81 |
| 1–3 years | <0.53 |
| 3–5 years | <0.39 |
| 5–7 years | <0.28 |
| >7 years | <0.21 |
Mean values of the assessed parameters at the beginning of the study.
| Parameter | N | Mean ± SD | Units | Median (q25–q75) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D | 35 | 20.02 ± 8.52 | ng/mL | 20.2 (11.8–25.00) |
| Ca | 35 | 9.72 ± 1.19 | mg/dL | 9.8 (9.6–10.20) |
| Calciuria | 36 | 4.28 ± 1.85 | mg/kg/24 h | 4.515 (2.94–5.37) |
| Ca/Creatinine | 33 | 0.19 ± 0.16 | mg/mg | 0.198 (0.13–0.26) |
| Z-score | 36 | −0.73 ± 0.87 | - | −0.855 ((−)1.26–(−)0.36) |
Figure 2Time-dependent serum concentrations of vitamin D (a), calcium (b), and Ca/Creatinine (c), determined in the second morning urine sample, converted to creatinine ratio, and calciuria (d) determined in 24 h urine collection, in patients receiving vitamin D supplementation.
The mean values of the assessed parameters after 24 months of vitamin D supplementation.
| Parameter | N | Mean ± SD | Units | Median (q25–q75) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D | 22 | 29.85 ± 9.65 | ng/mL | 29.25 (21.5–35.5) |
| Ca | 21 | 10.02 ± 0.41 | mg/dL | 9.9 (9.8–10.20) |
| Calciuria | 21 | 4.5 ± 2.24 | mg/kg/24h | 4.06 (3.30–5.43) |
| Ca/Creatinine | 22 | 0.2 ± 0.09 | mg/mg | 0.185 (0.13–0.26) |
| Z-score | 23 | −1.05 ± 0.77 | - | −0.96 ((−)1.7–(−)0.56) |
Figure 3Z-score values in patients who received 12 or 24 months of vitamin D supplementation.
Correlations between vitamin D and calcium concentration in the serum, and calcium excretion (in the 24-h and the second morning urine sample, assessed by creatinine level) at different time points. The statistically significant values are marked in bold.
| Variables | Time | R Spearman |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and calcium (Ca) | 3 months | 0.451871 | 0.007301 |
| 6 months | 0.215881 | 0.220112 | |
| 9 months | 0.216470 | 0.226283 | |
| 12 months | 0.037120 | 0.834899 | |
| 15 months | 0.297773 | 0.103748 | |
| 18 months | 0.068840 | 0.743692 | |
| 21 months | 0.560887 | 0.004355 | |
| 24 months | 0.237260 | 0.300404 | |
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and calciuria | 3 months | 0.093781 | 0.592064 |
| 6 months | −0.040049 | 0.822074 | |
| 9 months | −0.016993 | 0.921642 | |
| 12 months | 0.223403 | 0.204067 | |
| 15 months | 0.059459 | 0.754959 | |
| 18 months | 0.087581 | 0.670520 | |
| 21 months | −0.142049 | 0.507896 | |
| 24 months | −0.059740 | 0.797001 | |
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and Ca/creatinine ratio | 3 months | −0.039043 | 0.831986 |
| 6 months | −0.040196 | 0.821432 | |
| 9 months | −0.006245 | 0.971165 | |
| 12 months | −0.133705 | 0.450932 | |
| 15 months | 0.176983 | 0.332539 | |
| 18 months | −0.098432 | 0.647248 | |
| 21 months | −0.235857 | 0.267205 | |
| 24 months | −0.206331 | 0.356917 | |
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and densitometry | 12 months | 0.104499 | 0.575855 |
| 24 months | −0.314512 | 0.153997 |
Figure 4Dependence of serum calcium concentration on vitamin D concentration at 3 (a) and 21 (b) months after starting vitamin D administration.
The relationship between vitamin D concentration and urolithiasis activity after 3, 12, and 24 months of vitamin D supplementation.
| Time | Odds Ratio | Confidence OR −95% | Confidence OR +95% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and urolithiasis activity | 3 months | 0.761 | 0.987 | 0.909 | 1.072 |
| 12 months | 0.498 | 1.027 | 0.952 | 1.108 | |
| 24 months | 0.509 | 1.039 | 0.927 | 1.164 |