| Literature DB >> 32823943 |
Zhen-Li Qi1, Yun-Hui Cheng1, Zhou Xu1, Mao-Long Chen1.
Abstract
Porphyrins have planar and conjugated structures, good optical properties, and other special functional properties. Owing to these excellent properties, in recent years, porphyrins and their analogues have emerged as a multifunctional platform for chemical sensors. The rich chemistry of these molecules offers many possibilities for metal ions detection. This review mainly discusses two types of molecular porphyrin and porphyrin composite sensors for metal ions detection, because porphyrins can be functionalized to improve their functional properties, which can introduce more chemical and functional sites. According to the different application materials, the section of porphyrin composite sensors is divided into five sub-categories: (1) porphyrin film, (2) porphyrin metal complex, (3) metal-organic frameworks, (4) graphene materials, and (5) other materials, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: detection; fluorescence; metal ions; porphyrin; sensor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32823943 PMCID: PMC7461582 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Summarized porphyrins and porphyrin-based materials for metal ions detection.
| Type | Materials | Characteristics | Metal Ions | LOD | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular porphyrin | BODIPY-porphyrin dyad | Proportional detection of Ag+ in aqueous solution and living cells | Ag+ | 2.0 × 10−7 M | Zhu et al. [ |
| Porphyrin derivative | Neutral pH, low cytotoxicity, completed within 5 min, reversible | Cd2+ | 3.2 × 10−8 M | Huang et al. [ | |
| THMPP | Highly photostable and water soluble | Cd2+ | 1.5 × 10−8 M. | Namitha et al. [ | |
| Zinc porphyrin-dipyridylamino | Detection of Cu2+ in methanol solution, reversible | Cu2+ | 3.3 × 10−7 M | Weng et al. [ | |
| Bis-TMPipEOPP | With a higher tendency to self-aggregate | Cu2+ | 8.8 × 10−9 M | Liu et al. [ | |
| Porphyrin-quinoline dyad | In ethanol solution, pH 5.0–9.0, Hg2+ concentration in the range of 3 × 10−7–2 × 10−5 M | Hg2+ | 2.2 × 10−8 M | Han et al. [ | |
| Thiourea derivative | Visualized under ultraviolet light, with membrane permeability and low toxicity, application to Hg2+ paper strips | Hg2+ | 1.8 × 10−8 M | Lv et al. [ | |
| Tetrathia porphyrin | Colorimetric detection of Hg2+ in aqueous solution, high sensitivity | Hg2+ | 0.04 ppb | Virk et al. [ | |
| Naphthalimide-porphyrin hybrid | Hg2+ concentration in the range of 1.0 × 10−7–5.0 × 10−5 M, reversible and fast (response time less than 2 min) | Hg2+ | 2.0 × 10−8 M | Li et al. [ | |
| H2TEHPPS | High sensitivity and selectivity towards Mo6+ at pH 3.5 | Mo6+ | 1.5 μg L−1 | Feng et al. [ | |
| H2Pc-α-ZnPor | Pb2+concentration in the range of 0−4.0 μM, with dual-channel detection | Pb2+ | 3.4 × 10−9 M | Zhang et al. [ | |
| H2Pc-β-(ZnPor)2 | With a good linear relationship to Pb2+ concentration in the range of 0–2.0 μM | Pb2+ | 0.86 ppb | Qi et al. [ | |
| Azacrown [N,S,O]-modified porphyrin | Simultaneous detection of Ag+, Pb2+ and Cu2+, Cu2+ with dual-mode detecting potential | Ag+ | 7.8 × 10−7 M | Chen and Wang [ | |
| Cu2+ | 7.6 × 10–13 M | ||||
| Pb2+ | 1.3 × 10–11 M | ||||
| Cationic porphyrin | Ultraviolet detection of Hg2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+ in neutral aqueous solution | Cd2+ | 5 × 10−7 M | Zamadar et al. [ | |
| ZnP-CONH-Q | With strong fluorescence enhancement | Y3+ | - | Okamoto and Fukuzumi [ | |
| Porphyrin film | PAN/TMPyP/(PAH-PSS)3 membrane | Online visual and spectrophotometric sensing for cadmium during a flow-through process as well as static detection | Cd2+ | 1 ppm | Zhao et al. [ |
| PSF-PNaSS/TMPyP film | Visual and spectrophotometric detection and adsorption to remove Cd2+ ions, adjustable adsorption capacity, sensitivity, response time, and detection limit, the sensor membrane has good stability and reusability | Cd2+ | − | Zhao et al. [ | |
| TPPS/PVC membrane | Under alkaline conditions, the detection of Cd2+ within 20 min, and reversible | Cd2+ | 1.9 × 10–5 M | Czolk et al. [ | |
| H2TPPBPy/PVC membrane | Cu2+ concentration in the range of 2.0 × 10–8−1.0 × 10–5 M, pH 6−8, reversible and fast (response time less than 5 min) | Cu2+ | 5 × 10−9 M | Luo et al. [ | |
| DTPP/PVC membrane | Hg2+concentration in the range of 5.2 × 10−7−3.1 × 10−4 M, pH 2.4−8.0 | Hg2+ | 5.2 × 10−7 M | Zhang et al. [ | |
| Amphiphilic porphyrin film | Water-soluble and renewable | Hg2+ | 1 × 10−5 M | Dolci et al. [ | |
| Self-assembled film | Hg2+ concentration in the range of 1 × 10–10–1 × 10–6 M and with high stability | Hg2+ | 1 × 10–10 M | Fang and Liu [ | |
| Metal complex | Ce2(TPP)3 | Detection of Hg2+ and Cu2+ ions in aqueous solution with color change | Cu2+ | 2.34 × 10−6 M | Boroujerdi [ |
| Gd-TCPP | Colorimetric and fluorescent dual-mode detection of Fe3+, good water solubility, and determination of Fe3+ in fetal bovine serum samples | Fe3+ | 9.8 × 10−8 M | Chen et al. [ | |
| MOFs | PCN-224 | Detection of Cd2+, Br−, and THF within 1 min | Cd2+ | 2 × 10–9 M | Moradi et al. [ |
| MOF-PVC composite | With fast and sensitive detection of Cd2+ ions | Cd2+ | 0.3 ppb | Hibbard et al. [ | |
| MOF-525 | High sensitivity in the Cu2+ ion concentration range of 0.1–1.2 mg L−1 | Cu2+ | 6.7 × 10−8 M | Li et al. [ | |
| UiO-66(OH)2@PCN-224 | With built-in correction effect | Cu2+ | 6.8 × 10−11 M | Chen et al. [ | |
| MOF-525 NPs | Linear range of 1.0−250 nM, detection of Cu2+ ion in water samples and living cells | Cu2+ | 2.2 × 10–10 M | Cheng et al. [ | |
| PCN-222 | The linear range of Cu2+ concentration is 0.4–13 μM, and the response time is less than 3 seconds | Cu2+ | 5.0 × 10–8 M | Xu et al. [ | |
| PCN-222-Pd(II) | Fluorescence enhanced, detection of Cu2+ in complex environments | Cu2+ | 5.0 × 10–8 M | Chen and Jiang [ | |
| PCN-224 | Response rate as rapid as 2 min | Hg2+ | 6.0 × 10–9 M | Yang et al. [ | |
| PCN-221 | A quenching response of Hg2+ ions with a fast fluorescent response rate under <1 min. | Hg2+ | 1.0 × 10–8 M | Moradi et al. [ | |
| AuNP@MOF | With fast response time, high sensitivity and selectivity | Hg2+ | 1.03 × 10–10 M | Wang et al. [ | |
| Graphene materials | TMPyP/CCG | Water-soluble | Cd2+ | 2 × 10−6 M | Xu et al. [ |
| TMPyP /NGQDs | Detection of Cd2+ within 2 min at 25 °C, pH 7.0 | Cd2+ | 8.8 × 10−8 M | Zhang et al. [ | |
| GO–THPP | Hg2+ concentration in the range of 6.0 × 10−9−6.0 × 10−5 M, pH 7.5, detection within 210 s, and with renewable ability | Hg2+ | 3.2 × 10−9 M | Dorabei et al. [ | |
| TMPyP/NGQDs | Detection of Hg2 + in pH 7.0 and phosphate buffer | Hg2+ | 3.2 × 10−10 M | Peng et al. [ | |
| TMPyP/MoO3−x QDs | Shorting analysis time, high sensitivity, intracellular imaging | Hg2+ | 8 × 10−10 M | Zhang et al. [ | |
| Other materials | MoS2@TMPyP | Molybdenum disulfide accelerating the formation of metal porphyrin | Cd2+ | 7.2 × 10−8 M | Yin et al. [ |
| UCNPs/TPPS | Using smartphones with color scanning APP to identify color changes in the detection process | Cu2+ | 1.3 × 10−6 M | Yan et al. [ | |
| Paper-immobilized TMPyP | Combined with handheld UV lamp and smartphone or compact camera | Cu2+ | 0.16 ppm | Prabphal et al. [ | |
| TSPP immobilized on paper | Detection within 5 min at neutral pH | Cu2+ | 1 × 10−4 M | Prabpal et al. [ | |
| TDMPzP/Microfluidic paper | Suitable for testing under acidic conditions, pH 2.0−4.0 | Cu2+ | 1 ppm | Pratiwi et al. [ | |
| Porphyrin-functionalized Au@SiO2 | Colorimetric fluorescence detection of Hg2+, color change within 10 s, with renewable fluorescence intensity | Hg2+ | 1.2 ppb | Cho et al. [ | |
| CNC-SA-COOC6TPP | Good dispersion of cellulose nanocrystals | Hg2+ | 5 × 10−8 M | Chen et al. [ | |
| TPP−PZS | With a color change in acetone solution and as a test strip for rapid detection of Hg2+ | Hg2+ | 10 ppb | Hu et al. [ | |
| Pd-TCPP/Supramolecular hydrogels | Hybrid gel bundle, small size, Hg2+ concentration in the range of 6 × 10–8−1 × 10–6 M | Hg2+ | 1.7 × 10–11 M | Xue et al. [ | |
| TPyP5-MGs | Uniform distribution(radius about 189 nm), heat sensitive | Pb2+ | 5.9 × 10−9 M | Wen et al. [ | |
| SBA-16@Porphyrin | Colorimetric and fluorescence detection of Hg2+, Pb2+ and Cu2+ | Cu2+ | 3.6 ppm | Marcelo et al. [ | |
| Amphiphile/porphyrin modified mesoporous silica | Dual-emission material | Al3+ | 2 × 10−4 M | Tao et al. [ |
Figure 1Ionic porphyrins. Reproduced from ref [32,34,39,43,81,82].
Figure 2Structural formula of porphyrins modified with pyrrole, pyrazole, and pyridine. Reproduced from ref [31,33,84,85].
Figure 3Structural formula of porphyrins modified with sulfur and oxygen atoms. Reproduced from ref [35,36,42].
Figure 4Schematic of of zinc porphyrin–quinone-linked dyad for detection of Y3+. Reproduced from ref. [44].
Figure 5Schematic of phthalocyanine−porphyrin heterodyads for the detection of Pb2+ ion by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Reproduced from ref [38,40,41].
Figure 6Schematic of naphthalimide–porphyrin hybrid for the ratiometric detection of Hg2+ ion. Reproduced from ref. [38].
Figure 7Schematic diagram of BODIPY–porphyrin dyad for the detection of metal ions by FRET. Reproduced from ref [30,91].
Figure 8Sensing mechanism of the BODIPY–porphyrin dyad toward Ag+. Reprinted with permission from ref [30]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9Schematic model of optical sensor membrane fabrication and flow-through detection of Cd2+ ions. Reprinted with permission from ref [45]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figure 10Schematic model of the polyanionic poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate)-grafted polysulfone (PSF-PNaSS)/5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-N-methylpyridinyl) porphyrin p-toluenesulfonate (TMPyP) membrane fabrication and the sensitive response to Cd2+ ions. Reprinted with permission from ref [46]. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figure 11Schematic illustration of Gd−TCPP (5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4 carboxyphenyl) porphyrin) nanosized coordination polymer for Fe3+ detection in the colorimetric and fluorometric modes. Reprinted with permission from ref [53]. Copyright 2019 Springer link.
Figure 12Schematic illustration of the preparation of MOF-525 NPs and the “signal-off” fluorescence sensing for Cu2+. Reprinted with permission from ref [58]. Copyright The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.
Figure 13Schematic diagram of PCN222 preparation process. Reprinted with permission from ref [59]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 14Porphyrinic zirconium-based MOF as an efficient fluorescence sensing for Hg2+ ions and DMF small molecule. Reprinted with permission from ref [62]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figure 15A schematic illustration of the synthesis of mercapto-functionalized Zr–MOFs (metal–organic frameworks) via the post-synthetic modification. Reprinted with permission from ref [112]. Copyright The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.
Figure 16Schematic diagram of the detection for cadmium ions with MOF powder and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane composites in aqueous solution. Reprinted with permission from ref [55]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figure 17Molecular flattening of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-N-methylpyridinyl) porphyrin p-toluenesulfonate (TMPyP) adsorbed on the chemically converted graphene (CCG) sheet (a) and the schematic illustration of the prepared graphene oxide–tetrakis (4-hydroxyphenyl) porphyrin (Go–THPP) (b). Reprinted with permission from ref [64,66]. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015.
Figure 18Strategy for Hg2+ sensing on the basis of the synergistic effect of MoO3−x quantum dots (QDs) and Hg2+ on the cobalt porphyrin formation. Reprinted with permission from ref [68]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.