| Literature DB >> 32823857 |
Xia Hong1, Yuhao Mao1, Chuqin Yang1, Zhenjiang Liu1, Ming Li1, Daolin Du1.
Abstract
Zearalenone (ZEN) is a prevalent mycotoxin that needs intensive monitoring. A semi-quantitative and quantitative immunochromatographic assay (ICA) was assembled for investigating ZEN contamination in 187 samples of cereal and their products from China in 2019. The semi-quantitative detection model had a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.50 ng/mL with visual judgment and could be completely inhibited within 5 min at 3.0 ng/mL ZEN. The quantitative detection model had a lower LOD of 0.25 ng/mL, and ZEN could be accurately and digitally detected from 0.25-4.0 ng/mL. The ICA method had a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for on-site ZEN detection. For investigation of the authentic samples, the ZEN-positive rate was 62.6%, and the ZEN-positive levels ranged from 2.7 to 867.0 ng/g, with an average ZEN-positive level being 85.0 ng/g. Of the ZEN-positive samples, 6.0% exceeded the values of the limit levels. The ZEN-positive samples were confirmed to be highly correlated using LC-MS/MS (R2 = 0.9794). This study could provide an efficiency and accuracy approach for ZEN in order to achieve visual and digitized on-site investigation. This significant information about the ZEN contamination levels might contribute to monitoring mycotoxin occurrence and for ensuring food safety.Entities:
Keywords: immunochromatographic assay; quantification; semi-quantification; zearalenone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32823857 PMCID: PMC7472730 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12080521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Two models of result judgment for the immunochromatographic assay (ICA).
Figure 2The transmission electron micrograph image for the gold nanoparticles (GNPs) (A) and the UV/vis spectra for the GNPs and zearalenone (ZEN)-monoclonal antibody (McAb)-GNP probes (B).
The optimization of key parameters for the preparation of ICA for ZEN.
| Parameter | Concentration | Volume | Solvent |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAM-IgG | 13.1 mg/mL | 0.5 μL | 10 mmol/L PBS (containing |
| ZEN-antigen | 8.8 mg/mL | 1.0 μL | 10 mmol/L PBS (containing |
| ZEN-McAb | 1.0 mg/mL | 3.0 μL | 10 mmol/L PB |
| BSA | 10% | 100 μL | Purified water |
| K2CO3 | 0.2 mol/L | 2.3 μL | Purified water |
Note: The concentrations and volumes of ZEN-McAb and K2CO3 in this table are used in 1 mL GNPs. Other parameters were used for preparing a 30 cm of NC membrane.
Figure 3The semi-quantitative detection of ICA for the series of ZEN standards.
Figure 4The quantitative detection of ICA for the series of ZEN standards. (A) The corresponding relationship between the gray value (T/C) and the concentration of ZEN (ng/mL); (B) The linear relationship between the inhibition (%) and the logarithm of the ZEN concentrations (ng/mL).
Figure 5The cross-reactivity tests of the ICA for ZEN detection. The analogs were 5 ng/mL. (1) negative; (2) ZEN; (3) α-Zearalenol; (4) β-Zearalenol; (5) α-Zearalanol; (6) β-Zearalanol; (7) Zeranol; (8) Aflatoxin B1; (9) Deoxynivalenol; (10) Fumonisin B1; (11) Ochratoxin A.
The ZEN recoveries from using the ICA method in the spiked samples.
| Sample | Spiked (ng/g) | Dilution Times | Visualization a | Digitization (ng/g) | Quantitative Recovery ± SD (%, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 0 | 10 | − | ND c | ND |
| 3 | − | 3.4 | 113.3 ± 4.2 | ||
| 20 | ± | 18.6 | 93.0 ± 3.9 | ||
| 50 | + | 59.3 | 118.6 ± 5.5 | ||
| Wheat | 0 | 10 | − | ND | ND |
| 3 | − | 2.6 | 86.7 ± 4.6 | ||
| 20 | ± | 22.4 | 112.0 ± 3.7 | ||
| 50 | + | 45.2 | 90.4 ± 5.8 | ||
| Feed | 0 | 10 | − | ND | ND |
| 3 | − | 3.1 | 103.3 ± 4.9 | ||
| 20 | ± | 23.3 | 116.5 ± 6.2 | ||
| 50 | + | 56.4 | 112.8 ± 3.1 |
a The visual detection was based on the ZEN levels: <5 ng/g (−), 5 ng/g ≤ ZEN concentration < 30 ng/g (±); >30 ng/g (+). b Each value is the mean of three replicates. c Not detected.
The investigation of the ZEN in the original samples using the quantitative ICA from China in 2019.
| Item | All | Corn | Wheat | Wheat Flour | Cereal Product | Feed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total samples | 187 | 40 | 19 | 39 | 49 | 40 |
| ZEN-positive samples | 117 | 28 | 7 | 17 | 39 | 26 |
| ZEN-positive rate (%) | 62.6 | 70.0 | 36.8 | 43.6 | 79.6 | 65.0 |
| Average ZEN-positive (ng/g) | 85.0 | 46.8 | 27.1 | 12.4 | 95.9 | 173.0 |
| ZEN-positive range (ng/g) | 2.7–867.0 | 3.2–743.2 | 3.0–117.5 | 6.8–21.3 | 2.7–677.7 | 7.2–867.0 |
Figure 6The distribution of ZEN-positive rate (A), average ZEN-positive level (B) and ZEN-positive sample at different levels (C) from China in 2019.