| Literature DB >> 32823493 |
Qi Zheng1,2, Huihuang Wu2,3, Haiyan Jiang2, Jiejie Yang2,3, Yueming Gao2,3.
Abstract
Fluorescence immunochromatographic assay (FICA) is a rapid immunoassay technique that has the characteristics of high precision and sensitivity. Although image FICA strip readers have the advantages of high portability and easy operation, the use of high-precision complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors leads to an increase in overall cost. Considering the popularity of CMOS image sensors in smartphones and their powerful processing functions, this work developed a smartphone-based FICA strip reader. An optical module suitable for the test strips with different fluorescent markers was designed by replacing the excitation light source and the light filter. An android smartphone was used for image acquisition and image denoising. Then, the test and control lines of the test strip image were recognized by the sliding window algorithm. Finally, the characteristic value of the strip image was calculated. A linear detection range from 10 to 5000 mIU/mL (R2 = 0.95) was obtained for human chorionic gonadotrophin with the maximum relative error less than 9.41%, and a linear detection range from 5 to 4000 pg/mL (R2 = 0.99) was obtained for aflatoxin B1, with the maximum relative error less than 12.71%. Therefore, the smartphone-based FICA strip reader had high portability, versatility, and accuracy.Entities:
Keywords: CMOS image sensor; android; fluorescence immunochromatographic assay; quantitative detection; smartphone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32823493 PMCID: PMC7471973 DOI: 10.3390/s20164521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Design diagram of the optical module; (b) Optical path of the optical module; (c) Physical diagram of the optical module.
Figure 2Schematic of sliding window detection.
Figure 3(a) Standard strip images; (b) Test results of the standard strip images.
Figure 4Excitation and emission spectra of the human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) test strip.
Figure 5HCG test strips and collected images.
Figure 6Relationship between the concentration of HCG and characteristic value.
Test results for HCG.
| Concentration (mIU/mL) | Characteristic Value | Calculated Concentration (mIU/mL) | Recovery Rate | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 0.547 | 25.532 | 102.13% | 2.13% |
| 50 | 0.623 | 45.468 | 90.94% | 9.06% |
| 500 | 0.935 | 485.913 | 97.18% | 2.82% |
| 2500 | 1.161 | 2702.818 | 108.11% | 8.11% |
| 5000 | 1.229 | 4529.537 | 90.59% | 9.41% |
Figure 7Excitation and emission spectra of the aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) test strip.
Figure 8AFB1 test strips and collected images.
Figure 9Relationship between the concentration of AFB1 and characteristic value.
Test results for AFB1.
| Concentration (pg/mL) | Characteristic Value | Calculated Concentration (pg/mL) | Recovery Rate | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 2.069 | 23.096 | 92.38% | 7.62% |
| 75 | 1.585 | 77.218 | 102.96% | 2.96% |
| 250 | 0.999 | 278.572 | 111.43% | 11.43% |
| 1000 | 0.510 | 1127.132 | 112.71% | 12.71% |
| 2000 | 0.270 | 2050.697 | 102.53% | 2.53% |