Julia Riccardi1, Nicole I Farber1, Vanessa Ho2, Stephanie L Bonne3. 1. Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey. 2. Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey. Electronic address: slb391@njms.rutgers.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing the number of women and ethnic minority groups in surgery, the academic advancement of such individuals within surgical fields lags behind Caucasian men. We sought to identify gender and ethnic inequalities in the receipt of surgical society research grants for young faculty investigators and compare the scholarly productivity of these groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional and retrospective study, the gender and race of surgical society grant recipients were determined from surgical society Web sites. Surgical society grants aimed at providing research grants for junior faculty investigators were analyzed. Using the Scopus database, each recipient's scholarly productivity was determined by means of h-index, a standardized measure of the quantity and impact of an individual's published articles. We generated descriptive statistics to compare the gender, race, and h-index of grant recipients in the years 2006-2008 and 2016-2018. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2008, there were 68 research grant recipients. Of these recipients, 79% were men and 21% were women. The racial breakdown was 54% Caucasian men, 22% Asian men, 1.4% African American men, 1.4% Hispanic men, 12% Caucasian women, 7% Asian Women, and 1.4% African American women. The average h-index of the male and female recipients is 25 (±14) and 24 (±14), respectively (P = 0.81). Between 2016 and 2018, there were 113 research grant recipients. Of these recipients, 66% were men and 34% were women. The racial breakdown was 47% Caucasian men, 16% Asian men, 3.5% African American men, 1% Hispanic men, 26% Caucasian women, 3.5% Asian women, and 3.5% African American women. The average h-index of the male and female recipients is 12 (±8) and 9 (±6), respectively (P = 0.046). Caucasian women had the only statistically significant change in the proportion of grant recipients from 2006-2008 to 2016-2018, with an increase from 12% to 26% (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Most surgical society research grants for young investigators continue to be awarded to Caucasian men, with Caucasian women earning a distant second in the 2016-2018 cohort. Ethnic minorities continue to be awarded less research grants than Caucasian recipients. Overall, the average h-index of women was less than men. This study highlights the persistent need for surgical societies to consider gender and ethnic disparities when awarding junior investigator grants, including barriers minority groups may face in achieving the same h-index as Caucasian men.
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing the number of women and ethnic minority groups in surgery, the academic advancement of such individuals within surgical fields lags behind Caucasian men. We sought to identify gender and ethnic inequalities in the receipt of surgical society research grants for young faculty investigators and compare the scholarly productivity of these groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional and retrospective study, the gender and race of surgical society grant recipients were determined from surgical society Web sites. Surgical society grants aimed at providing research grants for junior faculty investigators were analyzed. Using the Scopus database, each recipient's scholarly productivity was determined by means of h-index, a standardized measure of the quantity and impact of an individual's published articles. We generated descriptive statistics to compare the gender, race, and h-index of grant recipients in the years 2006-2008 and 2016-2018. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2008, there were 68 research grant recipients. Of these recipients, 79% were men and 21% were women. The racial breakdown was 54% Caucasian men, 22% Asian men, 1.4% African American men, 1.4% Hispanic men, 12% Caucasian women, 7% Asian Women, and 1.4% African American women. The average h-index of the male and female recipients is 25 (±14) and 24 (±14), respectively (P = 0.81). Between 2016 and 2018, there were 113 research grant recipients. Of these recipients, 66% were men and 34% were women. The racial breakdown was 47% Caucasian men, 16% Asian men, 3.5% African American men, 1% Hispanic men, 26% Caucasian women, 3.5% Asian women, and 3.5% African American women. The average h-index of the male and female recipients is 12 (±8) and 9 (±6), respectively (P = 0.046). Caucasian women had the only statistically significant change in the proportion of grant recipients from 2006-2008 to 2016-2018, with an increase from 12% to 26% (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Most surgical society research grants for young investigators continue to be awarded to Caucasian men, with Caucasian women earning a distant second in the 2016-2018 cohort. Ethnic minorities continue to be awarded less research grants than Caucasian recipients. Overall, the average h-index of women was less than men. This study highlights the persistent need for surgical societies to consider gender and ethnic disparities when awarding junior investigator grants, including barriers minority groups may face in achieving the same h-index as Caucasian men.
Authors: Paris D Butler; L D Britt; Michael L Green; Michael T Longaker; W Peter Geis; Morris E Franklin; Aaron Ruhalter; Terrence M Fullum Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Amber E Budden; Tom Tregenza; Lonnie W Aarssen; Julia Koricheva; Roosa Leimu; Christopher J Lortie Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Jonathan S Abelson; Matthew M Symer; Heather L Yeo; Paris D Butler; Patrick T Dolan; Tracy A Moo; Anthony C Watkins Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Kevin Wayne Sexton; Kyle M Hocking; Eric Wise; Michael J Osgood; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Padmini Komalavilas; Karen E Campbell; Jeffrey B Dattilo; Colleen M Brophy Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2011-09-03 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Michaela A West; Shelley Hwang; Ronald V Maier; Nita Ahuja; Peter Angelos; Barbara L Bass; Karen J Brasel; Herbert Chen; Kimberly A Davis; Timothy J Eberlein; Yuman Fong; Caprice C Greenberg; Keith D Lillemoe; Mary C McCarthy; Fabrizio Michelassi; Patricia J Numann; Sareh Parangi; Jorge D Reyes; Hilary A Sanfey; Steven C Stain; Ronald J Weigel; Sherry M Wren Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Heather G Lyu; Pamela Lu; David A Mahvi; Lindsay E Y Kuo; Sandra L Wong; Chandrajit P Raut; Nancy L Cho Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 4.339