Literature DB >> 17963996

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.

Amber E Budden1, Tom Tregenza, Lonnie W Aarssen, Julia Koricheva, Roosa Leimu, Christopher J Lortie.   

Abstract

Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy change, there was a significant increase in female first-authored papers, a pattern not observed in a very similar journal that provides reviewers with author information. No negative effects could be identified, suggesting that double-blind review should be considered by other journals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17963996     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  72 in total

1.  Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia.

Authors:  Allison K Shaw; Daniel E Stanton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Gender Trends in Authorship in Psychiatry Journals From 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Kamber L Hart; Sophia Frangou; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.

Authors:  E E O'Connor; M Cousar; J A Lentini; M Castillo; K Halm; T A Zeffiro
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Authorship Trends Over the Past 30-Years in the Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

Authors:  Izath Nizeet Aguilar; Venkateswaran Ganesh; Rachel Mannfeld; Riley Gorden; Jennifer M Hatch; Shatoria Lunsford; Elizabeth C Whipple; Randall T Loder; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Sexist attitudes: Most of us are biased.

Authors:  Jennifer Raymond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A systematic review of peer review for scientific manuscripts.

Authors:  Bradley P Larson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-02-01

9.  Blind manuscript submission to reduce rejection bias?

Authors:  Khaled Moustafa
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Authorship trends in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis: An update.

Authors:  Michael P Kranak; John Michael Falligant; Peter Bradtke; Nicole L Hausman; Griffin W Rooker
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2020-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.